<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/feeling_good_about_what_youve_bought.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4/tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.648-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T22:14:28Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for Feeling Good About What You&apos;ve Bought</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.648</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/feeling_good_about_what_youve_bought.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=648" title="Feeling Good About What You've Bought" />
		<published>2009-02-18T00:49:46Z</published>
		<updated>2009-02-18T00:55:43Z</updated>
		<title>Feeling Good About What You&apos;ve Bought</title>
		<summary>The Americans United coalition has cut the first post-ARRA television ad; it&apos;ll run on national cable and in Washington, D.C., according to a spokesman. Why the need to tout a...</summary>
		<author>
			<name>Marc Ambinder</name>
			
		</author>
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[The Americans United coalition has cut the first post-ARRA <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX4RLuS46Fw">television ad</a>; it'll run on national cable and in Washington, D.C., according to a spokesman. Why the need to tout a bill that's already been signed? One calls to mind Charles Grodin's character in <i>Dave</i>, wondering why the country needed to spend money making Americans feel good about cars they already bought?&nbsp; The answer, I think, lies in two words: "first step."&nbsp; They were used by President Obama today at the bill signing. They're used by Obama in an e-mail to his presidential campaign list. And they're in the new ad. The goal, I think, is to condition elites, and then the American people, to see the economic recovery act as one of several significant, expensive, complicated (or, to keep the metaphor, high, risky and precarious) steps that the government needs to take in order to right the economy.&nbsp; &nbsp; ]]>
			
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.648-comment:658</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.648" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/feeling_good_about_what_youve_bought.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/feeling_good_about_what_youve_bought.php#comment-658" />
		<title>Comment from jb on 2009-02-18</title>
		<author>
				<name>jb</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>In other words they are going to take more of my children's money and spend it.  Hopefully this time we will get a real chance to see what the bill contains and they will restrict it to what we need rather than use it to return political favors as well.<br />
</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-02-18T16:57:56Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>