After the jump.
20:58: Obama says that some Democrats have been "too resistant to
reform" in education. Says bad teachers need to be fired. That "we
should have high standards" ... "My whole goal over the next four years
is to make sure that whatever arguments are persuasive and back up by
facts and evidence and proof that they can work, that we are pulling
people together around that kind of pragmatic agenda."
20:51: Sam Stein of the Huffington Post gets to ask a question. Asks
about Leahy's proposal for a truth commission. Obama says he hasn't
seen it. Restates positions on torture. Obama:
nobody's above the
law. "if there are clear instances of wrongdoing, people should be
prosecuted." Generally speaking, people should be looking forward,
rather than backward.
20:50: Come on, guys. Ask about Jeppesen. I just might have to go down there myself the next time.
20:49:
Helen Ven.. I always wrote Helen Vendler. Helen Thomas asks whether
Pakistan is allowing terrorists to operate, and she tries to get Obama
to admit that Israel possess nuclear weapons. Helen Vendler might ask
a question about why the Falcon Cannot Hear The Falconer.
20:47: Obama asked about A-Rod! Ok, but can someone ask about Jeppesen?
Obama gives the presidential answer. I'm ticked. The presser is over,
and no one has asked him about the second biggest story of the day.
20:43:
Major Garrett asks about VP Biden's 30% wrong prediction....Obama
laughs... "I don't remember exactly what Joe was referring to. Not
surprisingly. I think what Joe may have been suggesting, although I
won't' ascribe any numerical percentage to any of this, given the
magnitude of the challenges that we have, any single that we do is
going to be part of the solution not all of the solution."
20:38:
CNN's Ed Henry asks about when Obama will remove troops from
Afghanistan and will reverse the blackout policy on troops being
photographed coming home. "This is going to be a big challenge." Says
that "you get a sense that the political system is now functioning in a
meaningful way" in Iraq. Says government in Afghanistan "seems
distached" ... Taliban operating in Fata and border regions. Ties the
costs of getting Afghanistan right to 9/11. "We cannot allow Al Q to
operate. We cannot have those safe havens in those regions."
20:35:
Jake Tapper: beyond avoiding the catastrophe, once all the legs of the
stools are in place...how can the American people gauge whether Obama's
plan is working? Obama: "My initial measure of success is creating or
saving four million jobs." Jobs --> Confidence ---> Spending
--> Business investments --> More jobs. Then -- "seeing if our
credit markets operate." Step 3 -- Housing. "Have we stabilized the
housing market." Says that "if we get things right," country will
start to see improvement next year.
20:32: Won't the government
need more than the $350 billion in TARP funds? [The answer is yes. But
the White House doesn't want to acknowledge this publicly this yet.]
Obama: "My immediate task is making sure that ... $350 billion ... is
spent properly....before I even think about anything else." Says
Giethner and Summers are working together on transparency .... "We are
going to have to work with the banks in an effective way to clean up
their balance sheets." Obama: "We don't know yet.... whether we'll need
any additional money." He makes a good point: we gotta see how
institutions handle the money they're getting before we can figure out
whether we need more.
20:31: Priority two: "midterm and long term budget is dealt with." Same is true for consumers.
20:27:
Obama on priorities. Immediate job is "to stop the downward spiral."
Doing so means an increase in demand. "The biggest problem we're going
to have is our federal budget is if we continue a situation where there
is no tax revenues ... and we have more demand for unemployment
insurance...food stamps." Basically, to close the deficits long-term,
more spending is needed in the short term.
20:26: Obama's upset
at some of the cuts for school construction. Says that opposition
suggests that people don't want the government to be involved in school
construction. The opposition doesn't exactly make that argument.
20:25:
Making the eco-proofing argument .... this stuff creates jobs. Reducing
dependence on foreign oil. Puts money in politics. We're in an
Obamalog here... about six minutes of defensiveness.
20:21:
Obama: "there seems to be a set of folks who believe that we should do
nothing." Not sure who these folks are. Is he setting up a straw man
here? Those who are "sincere" about doing something... "What I've been
concerned about is some of the language that has been used..." about
pork, wasteful spending... when he hears it from folks who "provided
over the doubling of the national debt" -- it's a little rich. Number
2 -- some of the programs "aren't job creators." True -- "those
programs should be out of this particular recovery package and we can
deal with them later." No earmarks -- a knock at McCain? (There
aren't earmarks, but there are projects that certainly are destined for
particular areas.)
20:18: Chip Reid of CBS asks about
bipartisanship. Advisers say "not the number of votes, it's the number
of jobs are created." Is Obama creeping away from bipartisanship?
Obama: "it's going to take time to break down a lot of the bad habits."
Obama "can't afford" to see Congress play the usual political games.
Obama says he hopes his outreach pays dividends over the long-term.
20:16:
All about Iran: Obama recaps his campaign answer. Says his national
security is reviewing existing Iran policy, looking at areas where
dialog can be constructed... in the coming months, we will be looking
for openings that can be created...where we can start sitting across
the table, face-to-face. Seeks signals from Iran "that it will act
differently" as well.
20:15: "What I won't do is return to the
theories of the past 8 years that got us into this message in the first
place." ... "That's kinda what the election is about."
20:13
$800 billion wasn't plucked out of... a hat, he says, because demand
will decline by approximately $1 trillion. Save or create 4 million
jobs... (how will this be measured, again?)...one leg of the stool..
previewing tomorrow's steps to get the credit market loosened
up...massaging it..."condition taxpayer dollars that are being provided
to banks on them showing restraint"....
20:12: Obama on
criticisms -- he brings these up himself. Some don't like government
intervention -- these are "well-meaning" people; people who fault FDR
for intervening in the New Deal. Obama's argument is that only
government can step in to break the cycle.
20:11: Obama's "absolutely confident" that "we can solve this problem." Step 1 is passing the economic recovery plan.
20:10:
AP's Jennifer Loven asks about Obama's earlier words by saying that the
country is headed toward nonreversable catastrophe. Is he talking down
the country? "Oh, no, no, no." Obama 'splains: delaying perpetuates a
spiral that is much more difficult to get out of. Cites Japan's lost
decade; "they did not act quickly enough."
20:09: Obama speaks for ten minutes; calls on Congress to act expeditiously.







Thanks for the liveblog...dripping with cynicism. I want to respond to one point in particular, this post @20:21: Obama: "there seems to be a set of folks who believe that we should do nothing." Not sure who these folks are. Is he setting up a straw man here? I'm sure you've been very busy implementing this whole new political section for The Atlantic and must have overlooked the CNN article on your own front page quoting SC Governor (R) Mark Sanford as follows: "Instead of bailing out failing companies, Sanford told CNN’s John King that the government should let the economy work through the current challenges without intervention.
“We’re going to go through a process of deleveraging,” Sanford said. “And it will be painful. The question is: Do we apply a bunch of different band aids that lengthen and prolong this pain or do we take the band aid off? I believe very strongly: let’s get this thing over with, let’s not drag it on.”
I think what I learned from the presser is that Obama can be verbose, giving a long "why" instead of just a "what" answer, which reminds me of my father the professor. Overall, though I feel a lot more confident having a man of striking intelligence and admirable integrity running the country than I did with the half-wit who was in before or septuagenarian who was the alternative. I also think the press is going to have to up the seriousness and intellectual rigor of its game, given the President is no longer a dumbo.
"20:50: Come on, guys. Ask about Jeppesen. I just might have to go down there myself the next time."
Yes! I was so irritated that no one asked about this. Couldn't just one "bipartisanship" question be sacrificed for a civil liberties question?
And I agree with the previous commenter that you should reconsider the assumptions surrounding your 20:21 post. Mark Sanford is far from alone in saying the government should stay out of our economic problems. The point Obama rightly made is that this is not a rational starting place for discussion.
Disagree that this was an exercise in "defensive"ness. It's frustrating for many of us when the GOP get to parade their inanity on television every day without even the most basic of rebuttals from Democrats or the press. And then, when someone on the other side eventually does call them on their behavior, they're called "defensive". You have to see how this is a no-win situation for those who don't want GOP foolishness to overwhelm our discourse. This press conference was an example of Obama finally standing up for the role of government and for rational ideals. You can call it defensiveness, but I call it leadership.
BTW kudos to Jake Tapper for asking a good question! I might reconsider some of the many bad things I've thought of him.
Also, you win for best press conference live-blog.