<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/obama_wants_buy_american_out_of_stimulus_bill.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4/tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.318-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T22:14:25Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for <![CDATA[Obama Wants &quot;Buy American&quot; Out Of Stimulus Bill]]></title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.318</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/obama_wants_buy_american_out_of_stimulus_bill.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=318" title="Obama Wants &quot;Buy American&quot; Out Of Stimulus Bill" />
		<published>2009-02-03T23:07:26Z</published>
		<updated>2009-02-03T23:10:33Z</updated>
		<title>Obama Wants &quot;Buy American&quot; Out Of Stimulus Bill</title>
		<summary><![CDATA[That's what I'm reading in the transcript of the President's interview with ABC News' Charles Gibson tonight.&nbsp; Obama also concedes that the appearance of a double standard for his nominees...]]></summary>
		<author>
			<name>Marc Ambinder</name>
			
		</author>
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[<p>That's what I'm reading in the <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/WN/President44/story?id=6794453&amp;page=1">transcript </a>of the President's interview with ABC News' Charles Gibson tonight.&nbsp; Obama also concedes that the appearance of a double standard for his nominees is a valid complaint, and he says he takes full responsibility for it. </p>]]>
			<![CDATA[<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2"></font></b>&nbsp;Here's the "Buy American" portion of the deal:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">CHARLES GIBSON</font></b><font face="Arial" size="2">: A couple of quick questions. There are "Buy America" provisions in this bill. A lot of people think that could set up a trade war, cost American jobs. You want them out? </font></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">PRESIDENT OBAMA</font></b><font face="Arial" size="2">: I want provisions that are going to be a violation of World Trade Organization agreements or in other ways signal protectionism. I think that would be a mistake right now. That is a potential source of trade wars that we can't afford at a time when trade is sinking all across the globe. </font></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">CHARLES GIBSON</font></b><font face="Arial" size="2">: What's in there now? Do you think that does that? Do you want it out? </font></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">PRESIDENT OBAMA</font></b><font face="Arial" size="2">: I think we need to make sure that any provisions that are in there are not going to trigger a trade war. </font></p></blockquote>]]>
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.318-comment:204</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.318" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/obama_wants_buy_american_out_of_stimulus_bill.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/02/obama_wants_buy_american_out_of_stimulus_bill.php#comment-204" />
		<title>Comment from Angellight on 2009-02-04</title>
		<author>
				<name>Angellight</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration's plan to cap executive salaries and his willingness to say "I screwed up",  is change we can believe in, don't let the GOP tell you otherwise, as they do not want change!</p>

<p>The GOP pretend to care so deeply about the stimulus, when it is patently obvious and a derelict of their duty to the public, that the GOP are working furiously for the next elections and not the peoples' economic crisis looming so large at this time.  Some Republican Pundits charged with this task, call the Stimulus a stinking corpse, before it is even born, instead of what it is -- a valuable work in progress for this country.  Like any creation, in the early stages, it is chaos and not fully formed, such as a fetus, a painting, any work of art, and yet the artist ploughs on knowing the beauty to be eventually created.  Why in the world, would some Pundits criticize the early form instead of giving support, is beyond the pale, especially when they know to publically criticize it is to get the ball rolling to derail it.  May be they do not love this country more than their party affiliation!  These pundits sit in their high-paying jobs, so lofty, and pick apart every little thing someone says or does, Wears...., with nothing good to say, like their word is God or gold -- as they no longer report the news but give their Opinions about the news.  There was a time when we were taught as Americans, if you have nothing good to say about anyone, say nothing at all.  We have lost that.  These Pundits are a part of the problem and not the solution.  </p>

<p>At this critical stage in our rapidly-crumbling economy, it would seem that the Republican Senators would do everything they can to do something, to tell the American people, I am on your side, and not always to quickly say no to the middle class and the little people; no to schools, education, infra structure, green jobs, all of which have too long been denied and neglected and Yet, always yes to the Special Interest Groups,  to wars,  to big oil and their tax breaks.   </p>

<p>It is a sad fact that for average American citizens, the GOP is becoming the party of NO!   For Gosh Sake, they get from direction from Joe the Plumber!!  We can not depend on the GOP to help us, they never have. In 2010, we will know what to do.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-02-04T13:51:41Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>