<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4/tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T22:16:23Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for What Congress Can Do To Stop The AIG Bonuses</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=1543" title="What Congress Can Do To Stop The AIG Bonuses" />
		<published>2009-03-16T19:11:53Z</published>
		<updated>2009-03-16T19:13:37Z</updated>
		<title>What Congress Can Do To Stop The AIG Bonuses</title>
		<summary>As recounted below, there&apos;s not so much that the executive branch can do -- and should do -- to prevent AIG from handing out loopy bonuses. But why can&apos;t Congress...</summary>
		<author>
			<name>Marc Ambinder</name>
			
		</author>
		
		<category term="Promo" />
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.theatlantic.com/">
			As recounted below, there&apos;s not so much that the executive branch can do -- and should do -- to prevent AIG from handing out loopy bonuses.  But why can&apos;t Congress pass a law requiring that bonuses granted by a company that has taken bailout money from the Federal Reserve or TARP be taxed at a very high rate?   Obviously, Congress would have to find some way to distinguish between legitimate performance pay and illegitimate bonuses, but a one-year tax hike on all such bonuses might not be unpalatable. It&apos;s a much saner alternative than to give the Treasury the instruction to root through contracts to find ways of breaking them.
			
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543-comment:1621</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php#comment-1621" />
		<title>Comment from eric on 2009-03-16</title>
		<author>
				<name>eric</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Why should the executive have no say in the matter? Shouldn't the billions of federal capital come with contractual obligations to actually go towards solving the crisis?</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-03-16T22:44:09Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543-comment:1622</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php#comment-1622" />
		<title>Comment from Colt M on 2009-03-16</title>
		<author>
				<name>Colt M</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Good idea. Me thinks AIG will pay anything to keep the employee's pie-hole silenced. If they can't then the levee breaks.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-03-16T23:18:39Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543-comment:1637</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php#comment-1637" />
		<title>Comment from Ted T. on 2009-03-16</title>
		<author>
				<name>Ted T.</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>The problem with the tax idea, is that a lot of the most egregious AIG bonus recipients are based in London.</p>

<p>Break the contracts -- it can't be very complicated.  And as Marc pointed out the price of lawsuits will be public humiliation for the bonus babies -- not to mention discovery, which should make a lot of journalists happy, and a lot of traders very reluctant to sue over the ripped up contracts.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-03-17T02:17:18Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543-comment:1649</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php#comment-1649" />
		<title>Comment from Eric Stoltz on 2009-03-17</title>
		<author>
				<name>Eric Stoltz</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Marc, I have a modest proposal. Pay their bonuses in ShamWow. I hear a set of ShamWow is worth like $50 or something, and you can get them for only around $10 (if you act now). And they throw in a free set! So for every $10 we pay, the talented executives of AIG would get about $100 worth of ShamWow. They should totally go for this, because this is the sort of valuation they peddle.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-03-17T06:03:17Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543-comment:1674</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.1543" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/03/what_congress_can_do_to_stop_the_aig_bonuses.php#comment-1674" />
		<title>Comment from onedrfl on 2009-03-17</title>
		<author>
				<name>onedrfl</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>I just think that the Sham Wow idea is the best one I've heard. So very fitting!</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-03-17T18:11:49Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>