Politics with Marc Ambinder

« Who's The Divider? | Main | Tax Delirium And Gallup's New Poll »

Apr 13 2009, 6:07 pm

The Tea Party Movement: Who's In Charge?

Here is the organizational landscape of the April 15 tea party movement, in a nutshell: three national-level conservative groups, all with slightly different agendas, are guiding it. All are quick to tell you that the movement is a bottom-up affair and that its grassroots cred is real.

They are: FreedomWorks, the conservative action group led by Dick Armey; dontGO, a tech savvy free-market action group that sprung out of last August's oil-drilling debate in the House of Representatives; and Americans for Prosperity, an issue advocacy/activist group based on free market principles. Conservative bloggers, talk show hosts, and other media figures have attached themselves to the movement in peripheral capacities. Armey will appear at a major rally in Atlanta, FreedomWorks said.

All three groups vehemently deny that the movement is a product of AstroTurfing--fake grassroots activism organized from the top down--as some on the left have claimed. They will tell you that citizens-turned-activists, upset with President Obama's economic agenda and the financial bailout, have been calling them, asking for help and how they can organize protests on Wednesday. The movement, they say, is entirely organic: they are mostly providing help and resources to this new class of outraged conservative free-market populists, some of whom are their own members and some of whom are outsiders to politics with whom they've never communicated before--not even on an e-mail list.

FreedomWorks and dontGO seem to have taken ownership of the bulk of this coordination. The homepage of FreedomWorks' website now offers visitors a Google map of protests taking place across the country. They say they know of 600 Tax Day protests for which they are providing resources. The group has used its e-mail list to augment the work of dontGO, which created the website www.taxdayteaparty.com in February. dontGO, which was formed as an online rapid response team during the House of Representatives oil drilling debate last year, says it is "tracking" 700 events under its aegis. Americans for Prosperity says it has 24 state chapters that are organizing events. Overlap between all those numbers is quite likely: FreedomWorks told me a lot of its activity has been clueing its members to other protests in the area, so protesters can cooperate and conglomerate their events.

The movement is not tied to the Republican Party, group spokesmen said, despite a report that at least 10 House Republicans will be speaking at events across the country. Eric Odom, founder of dontGO, has infamously turned down a request from Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele to speak at the group's Chicago event.

Spokesmen for all three groups said they are not aware of any contact (other than the Steele incident) between their groups and federal-level Republican politicians, at the national level at least; Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), however, will speak at an Americans for Prosperity-organized event in Wisconsin, a spokesman for that group said. His appearance was organized by the group's Wisconsin chapter, Policy Director Phil Kerpen told me.
 
The three groups each want something different out of the protests.

FreedomWorks spokesman Adam Brandon sees them as an opportunity for the right to catch up to the left in terms of grassroots activity, incorporating the activist-network model used most effectively by MoveOn.org.

"Activists in general have learned a lot from the last election," Brandon told me. "You'd see 50 MoveOn.org people standing outside a gas station. We feel just as strong about our issues."

Progressive groups have employed that strategy in support of the same economic agenda the tea party protests seek to overturn: groups like ACORN and Americans United for Change have utilized their e-mail lists of supporters to organize field events across the country in support of the stimulus.

And in copying the left's model, Brandon says, FreedomWorks is no more guilty of AstroTurfing than MoveOn is.

"If you look at MoveOn's model...if you consider that AstroTurfing, I'd probably have to say that we're AstroTurfing," Brandon told me. But if critics assume the organization is top-down, he said, "they're gonna underestimate us."

FreedomWorks will place volunteers at some of the events to collect e-mail addresses and try to grow the group's network of activists. In the same way the Iraq war helped liberals recruit new activists, Brandon hopes Obama's economic agenda will fill conservative e-mail lists and coffers with new support.

dontGO founder Odom, on the other hand, does not see a parallel between his group and liberal ones like MoveOn. His vision for the movement is much more libertarian and revolutionary

"Their agenda was to get these individuals elected. Our agenda is to declare war on incumbency and long term power," Odom told me.

Hence the rejection of Steele's request. The goal is "not to promote Republicans at all," Odom said. "I voted for Bob Barr."

"I think April 15th is going to provide an environment in which a completely new movement comes out of that [conservative response to Obama's economic agenda]...new networks, new groups...the birth of a completely new base," Odom said.

As far as Fox News's promotion of the tea parties, promising coverage on Tax Day (and Glenn Beck's encouragement of viewers to attend), Odom said: "I love it. I think it's a very wise business plan. It's about ratings, that's what's going on now. Many people are looking for coverage."

(Indeed, the tea party protests have generated an epistemological problem for observers: most of the coverage has happened on conservative blogs, and it's always hard to tell whether the accounts are accurate, given that the bloggers back the protests, and there's a seed of doubt, sometimes, as to the authenticity of photos. Of course, now the same is true of Fox News, but at least they will have video cameras spread out across the country.)

Americans for Prosperity says it mostly wants to call attention to Obama's economic policies; ostensibly, at least, it does not have broader designs for the conservative movement or the size of its own e-mail list.

"We just think it's a great opportunity for average Americans to show up and make our voices heard," spokesman Erik Telford told me.

All three groups acknowledge that the reported energy behind the tea party movement doesn't have a particularly narrow focus. They're protesting the stimulus, the budget, the financial bailout (signed by President Bush), and more, they say. They also acknowledge that some will show up not out of economic rage, but out of pure opposition to Obama.

When Fox News's cameras start rolling on Wednesday, we will finally find out what the movement consists of. The only problem is the Heisenberg effect of Fox's cameras.

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Tea Party Movement: Who's In Charge?:

» Around The Sphere from The Moderate Voice
Our linkfest taking you to sites of varying viewpoints. Links do not necessarily reflect the views of TMV or its writers. So Who’s Really Behind The Tea Party Movement? (You’d think it would be Lipton, since they’re getting a lot of v... [Read More]

Comments (15)

phony "grass-roots" organizations led by Dick Armey and fauxnews tells you all you need to know about this political stunt...er "movement"

Hey Tiparillo, you are funny.... What box did you come out of...

AlchemyToday

The general idea behind astroturf is corporate contributions funding the creation of an apparently grassroots movement. Move On certainly spends a lot of money to gin up interest, and does have some big donors, but the comparison isn't really there.

That said, the tea party movement is fairly organic all in all as far as I can tell. If it were purely astroturf I assume the folks pulling the strings would try to avoid having events hosted by Stormfront, 9/11 truthers, etc.

24AheadDotCom

Seriously, how difficult would it have been for Chris Good to google AFP in order to see that they're part of the Kochtopus? Google that term if you don't know what it means.

My posts on the "parties" are here:

http://24ahead.com/s/tea-parties

Now that's odd because I have never heard of any of those organizations and I am attending a tea party.

THOUSANDS of people have already been going to tea parties and I can only imagine how big April 15 will be. Sure, there are some big groups involved in organizing, but they don't control people's minds and hearts. The people show up because they are ticked off about what this administration is doing to our country, not because some guy from a big group asked them to go.

Are you serious?? Wake up! People are MAD!

24AheadDotCom (Replying to: Lisa Graas)

Lots of people get mad over lots of things. Some people channel their anger into effective solutions to their problems. Others - like the "partiers" - don't.

For instance, which is these would have the greater result?

1. Holding a party in a solid blue district on L.I. which was attended by just 0.2% of those who'd voted in the last election, or

2. A BarneyFrank vs. The Student incident with the Dem Rep. from that district, but with a very sharp trial lawyer replacing The Student and really pressing the Dem Rep. on flaws in the stimulus or other spending. At the end of the ordeal, it's clear that the Rep is out of his league and his political career has been damaged.

I'm going to guess that the second would be far, far more effective vis-a-vis sending a message than the "parties".

Yet, your leaders - including those who support massive immigration - are pushing the tea parties. I don't think they were paid by BHO to tie up his opponents doing useless things, I think that's just the way things worked out.

ArnoldTPantsEsq (Replying to: 24AheadDotCom)

Do you seriously think the protesting and confronting politicians are mutually exclusive? You see 24, some people are smart enough to realize that you need both & can do both, & some people are fed up & need to vent unchanneled frustrations, so they go to rallies. Both are effective, but actually, the latter is more powerful b/c action breeds action. If people see one person, or a small group of people, confronting a politician or some other public figure, they think, "GREAT! Someone finally stuck it to him/her/them!" However, that does little to move that person into action, but if the same person turns on the tv & sees large groups of people all over the country getting involved, it shows them & other people who are sitting on their couches, or behind their keyboards, that they can actually get involved. The "Tea Parties" are very effective in this regard. & the very fact that people are "mocking" them, or downplaying their effectiveness just goes to show that they are afraid of them.

As for your 2 examples, why would you assume #2 to be "far, far more effective"? Your "reasoning" has about as many question marks as Matthew Lesko's jacket. First, the location. A solid blue district is EXACTLY where a Tea Party SHOULD be held. Why would you waste your time "preaching to the choir", when you could spread your message to areas/people who would either ignore it, or not be exposed to it otherwise. Sure, people in a blue are will be opposed, but if the idea is "in their face" (& you don't have attend the event to know it's in your area), they're less likely to ignore it. & actually, the more provocative, the more likely they are to look into it. Second, direct confrontation is important, but its main effect is on the base, not on the confronted. The confronted is more likely to evade or stonewall (as your particular example, Barney Frank, has done many times), but the confrontation is effective in energizing the base. As for sending a message? A large group is always more effective than a small one. & if politicians don't get it now, they will the next election. Personally, I hope the party's don't get the message and continue "business as usual" so that we can vote them all out.

Besides, most of you are missing the entire point. The Tea Parties are TAX PROTESTS. The bailouts are a hot topic, & their cost & mismanagement are made possible by the oppressive & counterproductive tax system we have in place now. The Tea Parties would still be going on w/o the bailouts. The bailouts just made them more popular. & liberals can whine all they want to about this being "anti-Obama", but they're missing the point, & don't realize that the very opposition of Tea Parties and the like are helping keep a system that is just as detrimental to them as it is anyone else (actually more so).

24AheadDotCom (Replying to: ArnoldTPantsEsq)

1. A broad-based movement to oppose BHO overreach - such as the spending of trillions of dollars - could get tens of millions of adherents. Instead of such a broad-based movement, the organizers of the "parties" went for their version of gold: some variant of opposition to taxation. The problem with their approach is that most Americans support some form of redistribution; try taking away their SS and see what happens. You can certainly push opposition to high, medium, or low taxation, but that's not going to have any more of an impact than what the LP is already doing.

2. I hesitate to use the word I'm thinking of, but those who are pushing the events seem to have picked up a dropped playbook from the RonPaul campaign. They think that playing dress-up games (i.e., revolutionary war attire) and holding a parade is a winning strategy, and it just isn't. Hint: the blimp wasn't a winning strategy either.

3. Some of the people supporting the parties have specifically rejected my better proposal in favor of their ineffective idea of holding street corner rallies. And, some others have shown exactly how dumb they are:

http://24ahead.com/melanie-morgan-storms-arlen-specters-office-over-stimulus-bi

(That video is from Armey's group.)

The problem is: the supposed "outrage" over Obama's economic agenda is limited to a small percentage of the population. Roughly 30% of Americans oppose Obama's plans overall. While a fraction of those people thought Bush and McCain were "too liberal", the vast majority of the "tea partiers" are just sore losers who saw their economic worldview rejected by the American electorate in November. This is no different than the ineffectual left wing rallies in the 1970s and 1980s. Sure, the left got a chance to "see what it was made of" and "raise awareness." Problem was: nobody cared outside the small base.

ArnoldTPantsEsq (Replying to: Elrod)

See the last paragraph to my response to 24. You're missing the point. It may help you sleep better to believe this is about Obama, but you're just tilting at windmills. Tea Partiers are protesting taxes...the same taxes you should be protesting if you knew what was good for you. The tax structure is the biggest threat to liberty & prosperity this country has ever seen.

Also, Bush & McCain WERE too liberal. They spent money & grew government like liberals could only dream. The only problem is, republicans moving left, just pushed the left further left. The only difference between Bush & liberals is where they get the money from. Bush largely borrowed, whereas liberals steal it from the paychecks of working Americans.

rottenrooster54 (Replying to: ArnoldTPantsEsq)

You liberals are programed to deny the truth. Taxes and mass money printing will lead to inflation and then the dollar devaluation. How could anyone who likes American prosperity not protest the Obama and Democrat congress reckless spending spree. You liberals are either stuborn, ignorant to learning the truth, or too proud to be corrected and believe the republicans are just sore losers! That is not only obsurd but shallow thinking on your part...

Thanks to a bit of quick Wikipedia magic...

Don't you mean the 'Hawthorne effect', rather than the 'Heisenberg effect'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(psychology)

I presume you're getting at the 'Observer effect' as related to human beings rather than quantum physics.

In psychology "The Hawthorne effect occurs when research study participants know they are being studied and alter their performance because of the attention they receive from the experimenters."

This 'Hawthorne effect' seems more applicable to a Fox news-crew.

This is hysterical. A protest of Taxes? So let me get this straight, all the conservatives are coming out tomorrow to protest the Taxes of George W. Bush? Because that is the tax policy we have in place RIGHT NOW. or is this ANOTHER case of some half baked idea by the desperate far right to try and take some kind of stab at the new administration but once again no one did their research and this was thrown out there like the alternate budget. A lot of papers with no numbers. A conservative protest of the Bush tax policy. And while we are at it let's call it "tea bagging" Obama. ROFLOL! Guys, please, I beg you, RESEARCH FIRST!!!!!!! Google is just a click away!

rottenrooster54

Astro-turf is the product of the leftwing puppet masters... MoveOn.com should move on to a socialist country and stop trying to change America. The Tea Parties are absolutely grassroots based and genuine, which is more than I can say for the Obama crowd and their tantrum lowbrowed misguided henchmen...

The media just can't get over this. There IS NOBODY IN CHARGE!!!! This isn't a staged political event for the benefit of a political candidate or a party.

The so-called 'protests' we are treated to on TV are almost always funded by rent-a-mobs like the SIEU, UNITE-HERE, ANSWER or which other union-funded liberal organization which is pretending to be 'grassroots' even while being financed and planned by professional 'activists' with gigantic bankrolls stolen from hard working union members.

The idea that people simply are fed up with the crap going on in D.C. is just impossible for these media geniuses to comprehend. They have no experience at all dealing with people who are without guile. They never grasped Sarah Palin. They didn't get Joe the Plumber. They didn't get the simplicity of regular people who are questioning the powerful but don't have an agenda of their own to be the new King.

So, as usual, they treat us like we are more of the professional protester crowd who are just frontmen for the already powerful who are pushing a political agenda at the behest and benefit of a politic party, politician or special interest group. When illegal aliens marched through our streets, nobody asked 'who is behind this????'. Despite it being a swarm of criminals demanding that the laws be ignored for their benefit, it was the people who opposed it who were held to the most scrutiny.

Let me just add my voice to the those who say 'See you around, Mainstream Media. I don't care if you ALL go out of business because you are a cancer on our Republic and a disgrace to the Constitution which you hide behind'. Go write a blog instead and stop pretending that your opinions are facts or have more importance than anybody elses opinions out here in flyover country.