Item: ""The honeymoon is coming to an end for President Obama, but it's not personal. It's professional," says NBC's Chuck Todd.
Item: "In poll, Obama seen as ineffective on the economy."
Item: An influential foreign policy journalist sees the U.S. as struggling to find the right posture on Iran.
Item: Coverage of the President's financial regulation plans are biased toward the unfavorable reaction of Wall Street.
Item: Numerous analysts conclude that the tempo of health care reform is slowing down because fiscal realities (and the CBO) are intruding on the optimism and energy.
Item: President Bush feels emboldened to step up criticism of his successor.
Item: Presidential pal/rival John McCain says the President isn't showing leadership.
Item: Bill Maher wants Obama to act a little more like Bush and take some risks.
....
Them's a few days worth of headlines. And I didn't even mention the gays! The media is on a kick these days. Where Obama's agenda has been packed of items and accomplishments, he's on a roll. Then, "realities" always intrude, and Obama's agenda "stalls" as the public begins to have doubts. The cycle of coverage seems to be based, or at least, set to the music of the public's appreciative murmurs or disapproving groans. The reality, as always, is that Obama is never as up as he is when he is "up," and never in as bad a spot as he is when he is "down."
The same polling that suggests some growing skepticism about Obama's ability to contain the deficit shows that his approval rating remains near 60 percent, down only slightly. Americans remain -- and are growing -- much more confident about the future than they were. Americans do not blame Obama for the deficits. They have a much better impression of the Democratic Party than they do the Republican Party, which seems to be going out of its way to help the Democrats.
There has always been a gap between Obama's personal popularity -- as Chuck Todd points out -- and support for some of his policies. But take a look at which policies are unpopular: the bailout of the auto industry and deficit spending -- policies that the public still associates with Republican excesses, not with Obama's.
To be sure, the public opinion landscape is less positive for Obama than it was, and independents, in particular, don't quite accept the White House's grand narrative about why these deficits are OK but these deficits aren't. I've seen private polling done for Democratic House races out West that shows real concern among less-ideological Democrats about the direction of Obama's economic and health care policies. A Democratic strategist who has close ties to the leadership in Congress tells me "that the budget deficit and spending are very hot button issues hat are permeating into races on all levels and creating a sour mood
that could potentially explode in our face. "
And when given information about the costs of health care and its likely impact on the deficit, the numbers for electing Republicans, not just generically, but any named candidate, under
the header "to bring back balanced government" go through the roof, this strategist says. That explains why Democratic Senators are panicking about the early, preliminary CBO scores: they don't want the public to see the plans first in terms of the deficit. They'd rather them see the good parts: universal coverage, etc.
Reports of opposition to a "public plan" are overrated, but the political reality will be created by the party that best frames the issue: putting government between you and your doctor is the favored riff of Republicans these days, thanks to Frank Luntz. It's catchy. The Obama-Democratic riff is that health reform is an imperative. The public agrees with Obama and is also afraid of the effects of reform, as if there's a way to somehow reform a major institution without affecting the people who are happy with it. That dissonance is always present in public opinion, easily able to be exploited by both sides of an argument. It's a little disingenuous to say that a major revision of health care in America won't touch those who like their insurance plan and their doctors. Some Americans are bound to find that their choices narrow, or increase; that their premiums may rise, or fall; that the number of tests they get declines; that the insurance company begins to bother them more frequently about preventative medicine.
So -- Democrats in Congress are slowing down a bit, and the calendar for health care legislation is being expanded, as the White House knew that it would.
The upshot of all of this is to say that the media meme is reductive. There are some fairly solid baselines for the Obama presidency, and there are some trends that his strategists are going to watch.
I would not expect this White House to overreact. "These days happen once every couple of months," a senior administration official e-mailed this morning. "They are almost like clockwork."
« How Likely Is A Mousavi Presidency? | Main | The Centrist Fallacy »
Jun 18 2009, 9:40 am







BTW Getting the "Idea of the Day" popup on every single page of this blog is making me not want to come back. It's out of control.
I wonder if those on the left even realize they've done more to hinder Pres Obama's agenda or lower confidence in him that anything the Republicans have done or could have hoped to do. In fact, he's lucky they are so unorganized right now, or he'd have real problems on his hands.
It's amazing how people blaim Bush for the way the economy is, but totally ignore the fact that Obama added another 1 trillion dollars to the national debt.
-Nikki-
1 dollar ebooks
Thanks for the spam and the stupidity, NIkki...
It's astonishing (and depressing) to see the media echo chamber at work. Last week, the Republican Party was almost dead. Then, I am away from TV for several days, and this morning I learn that Obama is about to go down in flames. Based on one poll, Morning Jo[k]e claims that people are more concerned about deficit reduction than health care. Oh, really? Do the talking heads realize how silly they sound?
They don't realize it Karen, what's worse, they don't care.
Pat Buchanan is pathological and Joe is schizo at best.
You get these "talking heads" on TV to express a point of view and all they do is spit out the "talking points" of the day. And like [the poster] slag, I'm getting pretty sick of it.
Mr. Sullivan is doing a wonderful job of reporting on the Iran Twitter-based revolution. And I think that TV "journalists" and commentators should really beware of the actions on the ground there. For it won't be too long that reasoned debate, between reasoned people, who don't subsist on commentating for a living will replace the talking heads in this country.
As for the poll, the political calculation that the administration is making is to use the pressure of the failures of the Bush administration to address some (honestly) liberal policies and wait for the economy to return to its natural "ebb and flow" stasis.
If it works, and people begin to see positive signs of improvement in their everday lives, and President Obama gets a second term. If it doesn't work, the Republican Party would have about 2 years to build a coherent "middle of the road" message to appeal to independents. Given the current emerging fault lines in that Party, I think it's a wise bet to make.
Great post!
In one of the economy’s darkest hours in decades, it looks as if people are taking Barack Obama up on his exhortations for hope and change.The financial crisis has taught us a lot. One of the things the financial crisis has taught us is that even giants can fall, and even though he lives down the street, the local banker cares more for a balance sheet than anyone's household. It's been a terrifying ride, and hopefully the whole thing will be back up faster than the fastest rapid payday loans. The financial crunch has put a hurting on many industries and millions of people, and the lessons to be learned for the future are legion. There are now record numbers of people running for payday loans because of unreliable banks during the financial crisis. Read more click http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/05/31/financial-crisis-taught-payday-loans/