Politics with Marc Ambinder

« The Invisible Primary, 6/29 | Main | The Day In Politics, 6/29 »

Jun 29 2009, 7:44 pm

Obama's Warm LGBT Reception

Despite skepticism among the gay community and a wary sense that President Obama might not have the courage to deliver on his campaign promises, he got a pretty good reception from LGBT attendees at his Pride Month reception at the White House Monday.

Obama drew early and enthusiastic applause from the crowd of 250-300 LGBT families, volunteers, community leaders, federal employees, state and local lawmakers, and heads of LGBT lobbying/activist organizations gathered in the East Room as he called out greetings to openly gay appointees and gay rights activists, then delivered remarks for about 20 minutes. (Hear audio of Obama's remarks here.)

"Welcome to your White House," he said to the crowd as he addressed it.

As noted elsewhere, Obama has yet to earn the trust of many in the gay political community. His administration hasn't prioritized a repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell in Congress; its Justice Department defended the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the Clinton-signed bill that defines marriage as between a man and a woman--an opinion that's been called insulting to the gay community. He doesn't believe in gay marriage. The message gays have been gleaning from the administration thusfar is: be patient.

Obama confronted that sentiment in his remarks.

"Now I know that many in this room don't believe that progress has come fast enough, and I understand that. It's not for me to tell you to be paitent any more than it was for others to counsel patience to African Americans who were petitioning for equal rights a half century ago," Obama said.

"But I say this: we have made progress, and we will make more. And I want you to know that I expect and hope to be judged not by words, not by promises I've made, but by the promises that my administration keeps," he said, drawing applause.

"We've been in office six months now. I suspect that by the time this administration is over, I think you guys'll have pretty good feelings about the Obama adminsitration," the president said.

He was certainly right about some of that: gay leaders don't think change has come quickly enough, and every day that goes by without advancements of gay rights they see as an affront.

Obama then got into some points on the gay rights agenda, making promises or signaling progress on each item. He touted the extension of benefits to LGBT partners and families of federal employees and the advancement of hate crimes legislation through the House.

He sought to justify the Justice Dept.'s defense of DOMA: "We have a duty to uphold existing law, but I believe we must do so in a way that does not exascerbate old divides, and fulfilling this duty and upholding the law in no way lessens my commitment to reversing this law," he said, later calling again on Congress to reverse it.

He credited the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq with the lack of progress on Don't Ask, Don't Tell: "Someday, I'm confident, we'll look back at this transition and ask why it generated such angst. But as commander in chief, in a time of war, I do have a responsibility to see that this change is administered in a practical way and a way that takes over the long term," Obama said, giving a nod to the continued dismissals of openly gay servicemen and women and the "deep disappointment" they've caused those who've been dismissed.

All of the policy talk got less applause than the opening; but it got mild, and sometimes raucous (on the hate crimes bill), applause nonetheless.

As one gay rights leader noted this morning, people are generally excited to go to the White House, and despite the skepticism, attendees would be in a good mood regardless of the content of the event, though they'd be hoping to feel good about things as they left.

It's also worth pointing out that not all 250-300 of those in attendance were the hard-nosed lobbyist/presidents of gay rights lobbying groups, and I suspect many of them don't have the acerbic political instincts that go with that territory.

When asked why the crowd cheered Obama despite so much skepticism, one source who was in attendance retorted, "His finance committee was there," an observation I did not take literally, nor did I confirm.

So the crowd may have had something to do with Obama's warm reception.

As the president closed, praising the Stonewall protesters who 40 years ago gave birth to the gay rights movement in America--two of whom were in attendance in the East Room--Obama seemed to accrue historical cred by honoring that movement in the White House, on its anniversary--a significant historical fact in itself, and one that was not lost on those in attendance. Raucous applause ensued, with one person yelling, "We love you!"

"There was warmth, but there was also trepidation," said the head of one gay group, who attended the reception. "On the one hand, no event like this has ever happened, and President Obama said words no [president] had ever said before about the gay community being part of his America and his administration, and that has a very powerful effect."

"There's an impatience that many of us feel because, every day, gay servicemembers who are serving with honor are being discharged, and he has not stopped that," the group leader said. "We want the Obama that we believed in and helped to elect" during the campaign.

The Obama that showed up in the East Room was the campaign Obama, the advocate said.

Obama's speech didn't signify any major policy development or major action; it didn't bump Don't Ask, Don't Tell or DOMA higher on his administration's legizlative agenda, which is what gay activists want. But Obama paid tribute to the history of the LGBT movement, and the crowd was most pleased. And he didn't say "be patient"--even though he sort of did.

Comments (14)

I was there at the beginning. I was almost 20 years old when it all started at Stonewall, in the Village, at Sheridan Square. The bar is very different now. In fact a lot has changed since then. In the last forty years we've come a long way. We still have a way to go. I can only urge patience and persistence. Obama knows what he is doing. He's on our side. Unilateral action would cause backlash. Our President knows how to pick his battles, and when. We must be patient with Obama, and persistent in our struggle. This is the first Pride Anniversary during which I felt great pride in the man whom we elected President.

Barack Obama is a game changer. I believe that history will show him to be one of the greatest Presidents to lead our nation.

Kmber (Replying to: Messagero)

Nice post Messagero.

jm3 (Replying to: Messagero)

Your post seems to say more about your strength of feeling for Obama than it does for your expectation that he will help the gay community over the next few years. I'm glad you love and respect our president, but I don't think it answers any of the very real concerns we have about the progress we are not making right now.

The problem so many of us have is that we sense that a lot more progress could be made, with a lot less trouble, but that fear of "unilateral action causing a backlash" is holding us back from making real progress. If there is a backlash, many of us think our community is now ready to fight back. We're tired of hearing politicians wearily tell us that we aren't being "real" in our expectations, when our own fear is that they merely do not place a very high priority on supporting our issues.

I worked hard for Obama, and I voted for him. But when I did that I didn't decide to let him replace his judgment with mine. In fact, given the Presidential bubble, I think those of us who are closer to the real world, and outside of the Beltway, may have a better sense of what is possible. There is a real chance that if we act now politicians will get over their fear of "gay backlash" and learn that supporting gay rights will not lead them to lose the next election.

The problem I have with Obama right now is that he tells our community again and again to "trust" him. On words alone. After six months of conscious avoidance. And no track record of any support for gay rights that place him ahead of what Clinton was doing in 1993. No progress whatsoever. You seem to believe we should trust him. I disagree.

Trust, but verify.

Joshua Lyle (Replying to: Messagero)

You seem to have a lot of pride in a person that claims to value a supposed duty to preserve an unjust law over both your rights and his duty to defend them.

Persistence, yes, but the time for patience is over. We have been patient long enough. Now the pressure must be kept on Obama and on the congress. We've heard "The audacity of hope." Now it's time for "The Audacity of Deeds." You may -think- he's on your side. I've seen scant evidence that he's on -my- side. Every day that he fails to show genuine leadership on these issues has real-life effect on Gay Americans. As a senator he said he was for gay marriage. On the national stage as a presidential candidate suddenly he's against gay marriage. He wants DOMA overturned. Yet he defends it using the most offensive language possible. He says he wants "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" overturned, and yet he fails to take even the most minimal action his powers allow him to suspend dismissals. So I've heard his talk -- I haven't seen his walk. You may count the appointment of a handful of gay men to nearly invisible administrative posts as progress. I don't call that progress. I call it tokenism. If Obama wants to earn our community's trust, let him -at least- denounce the language of that DOMA defense and fire the asses of the Justice officials who crafted it in his name.

I've been very angry with Obama since Warren, but he got me with:

"Welcome to your White House."

We've never been treated like that.

Its exactly what we wanted to hear, what we needed to hear, even if we hadn't demanded it.

For besides the numerous rights we lack, it is the psychological oppression of lack of acceptance as full community members which still oppresses day in, day out - every time we don't say something, censoring ourselves for fear of offending, then compensating so often with exaggerated expressiveness when we're together.

His putting us up as the moral equivalents of African Americans in the civil rights struggle is also a very quotable quote.

Frank Rich rightly pointed out that Obama has been uncharacteristically inarticulate on our issues. Let's hope today is a first step toward Obama's self-improvement in our area.

Let's savor it a bit - it will rejuvenate us and give us the strength we need to keep fighting the hard fights ahead.

Let's help get health care passed (let's remember, affluent LGBT people, the right to affordable medical care is of more urgent practical concern to many many GLBT people than the many other rights we alone lack).

Then we can bear down hard on the Dems and call in our chits with even more urgency and vigor. Otherwise in 2010 and 2012, we'll turn into the most howling PUMA's imaginable, and Obama needs those Senate seats.

Kmber (Replying to: Tom Fennell)

Energy, healthcare, and financial regulation come before anything else.

DADT, DOMA, immigration reform....that's 2010 material.

Oh yea education should be in there somewhere as well.

Tom Fennell (Replying to: Kmber)

Late 2009 or first quarter 2010, or there will be electoral trouble in the 2010 Democratic primaries.

LBJ didn't put Medicare ahead of the Civil Rights Act. He pushed BOTH hard. Will Obama live up to his achievements? Time will tell.

Joshua Lyle (Replying to: Kmber)

See, if he wasn't responsible for action taken to supportDOMA, he might get a pass for not acting against it.

But now he's culpable for it.

Rillion (Replying to: Kmber)

Until I get more then words about how he will get to us eventually, while his administration defends DOMA with hateful arguments and his military continues to discharge gay soldiers, I am not going to support the rest of the agenda. Sorry but that's just the facts, you can't expect me to help with the rest of the agenda while getting slapped around. I don't do abusive relationships.

It'll get done- just not at the pace LGBT community would like.

That's the reality.

Tom Fennell (Replying to: Kmber)

Would that you had the compassion that Obama showed in his deeply understanding statement on our impatience.

Rillion (Replying to: Kmber)

My fear is that the economy continues to stink through the 2010 mid-terms and the Republicans regain a majority in the House. Then all of Obama's promises to get to gay issues eventually will be moot because seriously what gay rights measures are going to pass a Republican House? Also if the House Democrats are in trouble going into the 2010 mid-terms they are not going to want to deal with gay rights for fear of firing up the religious conservatives. So every day that goes by I fear the chances of getting anything done get smaller.

No. There's always going to be some other "crisis" that needs fixing or some other war that needs fighting. American history is one long series of wars. Obama said today that he couldn't really address "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" while America was still involved in two wars. He's wrong. There's no better time to address it, when America needs the skills and talents and commitment of any able-bodied man or woman willing to step up and serve, and when 75% of Americans support ending the policy. And if we accepted his reasoning, what guarantee do we have that, come the end of his administration, we will not still be bogged down in these wars or in the next one to come? Iran, perhaps, or North Korea?

Energy, healthcare and financial regulation - those are all going to cost him so-called "political capital." As will climate change and Immigration. If we patiently wait until he gets to the bottom of his agenda - that's us - then maybe he'll have no political capital left to spend on us.

Yes, "Welcome to YOUR Whitehouse," are powerful words. Like a pocket watch swinging on a chain before your face, they can make your eyes glaze over until the speaker's voice is the only voice you hear.

But the voice behind that pocket watch is same voice that tells us with one side of his mouth that he wants to overturn DOMA and on the other side of his mouth defends DOMA by comparing our relationships to pederasty and incest. Obama claims it was his job to defend this law - but to defend it with this language?

Trust is something that should be earned, and Obama has broken trust with us. Another speech and an East Room coctail party for a select few should not be sufficient to mend that trust. That should take deeds, and we should keep the pressure on him to perform.