The Drudge Report gets a transcript of Sarah Palin's appearance on Fox News tonight:
PALIN: Well, when you consider that the federal government is about eleven trillion dollars in debt, and we're borrowing more to spend more.. it defies any sensible economic policy that any of us ever learned through college. It defies economy practices and principles that tell ya 'you gotta quit digging that hole when you are in that financial hole'So, even as Palin is rebuffed by the National Republican Congressional Committee--which reportedly did not want her to speak at a fundraising dinner tonight for fear she'd overshadow keynote speaker Newt Gingrich--the govnernor makes a big headline today without appearing at the party engagement, with a "we told ya so" line that will probably reach more conservative voters anyway.
Palin continues:
"America is digging a deeper hole and how are we paying for this government largesse. We're borrowing. We're borrowing from China and we consider that now we own sixty percent of GENERAL MOTORS - or the U.S. government does... But who is the U.S. government becoming more indebted to? It's China. So that leads you to have to ask who is really going to own our car industry than in America."
HANNITY: You know but it goes back - It does go back a little to the campaign. I mean, 'spread the wealth, patriotic duty...'
PALIN: Kind of a 'we told ya so'.
HANNITY: Well, is that how you feel?
PALIN: That's how I feel! I feel like... and I think that more and more constituents are going to open their eyes now and open their ears to hear what is really going on and realize ok... Maybe we didn't have a good way of expressing that, or articulating that message of 'here is what America could potentially become if we grow government to such a degree that we cannot pay for it and we have to borrow money from other countries, some countries that don't necessarily like America.
And this many months into the new administration, quite disappointed, quite frustrated with not seeing those actions to rein in spending, slow down the growth of government. Instead Sean it is the complete opposite. It's expanding at such a large degree that if Americans aren't paying attention, unfortunately our country could evolve into something that we do not even recognize.
(Note: this is the second time Palin has accused President Obama's economic policies of clashing with basic, college-level economics--something Conor Clarke has taken issue with on his Atlantic Correspondents blog.)







"But who is the U.S. government becoming more indebted to? It's China. So that leads you to have to ask who is really going to own our car industry than in America."
Ahh, that's the Sarah I grew so to love last fall. Seriously, aren't the light hearted bumble-headed moments she brings worth all the trouble?
Unfortunately, her points on the debt weren't quite so funny. Her only mistake was in referencing economics, where it seems its practitioners' have made it a practice to endorse virtually any hair-brained quasi-academic scheme under the sun, as long as they can turn a buck or make a reputation on it.
I've found that a basic understanding of simple checkbook accounting and the Time Value of Money exponential function (FIN 101) explains our current predicament MUCH better than all the Harvard/Princeton/MIT trained economists breathing today. IT'S THE DEBT STUPID!
Sarah 'Cuda chews up 'Bam-o-nomics...
It took just over one hundred day's to figure out just how sharp Sarah Palin is. So lets make fun of her some more on these low rated television shows and let's try to make her look stupid with these liberal interviewers. Sarah was right then and she is right NOW! 2012
Is Hannity a Liberal interviewer? It's not that liberal interviewers make her look dumb. It's not even that she makes herself look dumb, but rather it is just the sad fact that she simply is dumb.
I would respond that it's not about being smart or dumb, it's mostly about being honest or not.
I won't argue Sarah's intelligence, since I meant to (unsuccessfully evidently) disparage it above, but I WILL argue against BOTH parties honesty. The issue of the Federal debt/deficit has evidently become a plaything of the professional political class. That's too bad, since it's (as always) the unfortunate job of the political "heavy lifters," those who actually DO, as opposed to those who merely TALK for a living, to shoulder the eventual burden.
Oh well, same as it ever was, and ONCE AGAIN it's proven true: YOU GET THE GOVERNMENT YOU DESERVE.