<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4/tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T22:14:00Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for Will Sanford&apos;s Admissions Change Politics?</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=20067" title="Will Sanford's Admissions Change Politics?" />
		<published>2009-06-24T19:59:13Z</published>
		<updated>2009-06-24T20:01:20Z</updated>
		<title>Will Sanford&apos;s Admissions Change Politics?</title>
		<summary><![CDATA[I'll have more to say about this later, but I think the answer is yes:&nbsp;Once again, Americans have another reason to throw their hands up and say, "There's another politician...]]></summary>
		<author>
			<name>Marc Ambinder</name>
			
		</author>
		
		<category term="Promo" />
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[I'll have more to say about this later, but I think the answer is yes:&nbsp;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; ">Once again, Americans have another reason to throw their hands up and say,
"There's another politician who couldn't keep it in his pants, and who
abused the public trust." &nbsp;Confidence in political institutions is as
low as it was after Watergate, and the less confidence the public has in
politicians, the less competitive elections will be; fewer good people decide
to run for office, and the cycle perpetuates. &nbsp;I'm not so sure the ultimate meaning of the revelation has anything to do with moral&nbsp;hypocrisy; the archetype of conservative moral scolds is no longer salient outside GOP primary politics. Imagine if Rudy Giuliani had run in this environment....&nbsp;</span>]]>
			
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215125</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215125" />
		<title>Comment from satrap on 2009-06-24</title>
		<author>
				<name>satrap</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>If we could only have a faithful politician who wasn't constantly preaching family values, boring biblical passages, and actually walking the walk, it would be great.</p>

<p><br />
Oh, we do?  The President?  Sorry, never mind.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-24T20:18:11Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215137</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215137" />
		<title>Comment from bobierto on 2009-06-24</title>
		<author>
				<name>bobierto</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Gotta disagree, Marc. It may be that only hyper "conservative" G-nO-P primary voters actually care about the conduct. But many more of us care about hyper conservative moralists damning us to hell and then sneaking about engaging in the kind of behavior they claim to abhor. And vote accordingly.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-24T20:23:42Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215151</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215137" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215137"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215151" />
		<title>Comment from Abhinav on 2009-06-24</title>
		<author>
				<name>Abhinav</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Not to mention Republicans constantly harping on Defense of Marriage laws, sanctity of marriage as between one man and one woman, fear mongering of gay marriage etc...</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-24T20:36:22Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215257</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215257" />
		<title>Comment from colby on 2009-06-24</title>
		<author>
				<name>colby</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>"Imagine if Rudy Giuliani had run in this environment.... "</p>

<p>Err, he'd have still lost. It wasn't his affair that cost him the nomination, it was his awful campaign and spotty record. Indeed, his affair was known before he even got in the race- and thus, before those long months of him being up double-digits on the rest of the field.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-24T23:14:44Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215288</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215257" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215257"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215288" />
		<title>Comment from UncommonSense on 2009-06-24</title>
		<author>
				<name>UncommonSense</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>It was Rudy(!)'s awful campaign... and the fact that he was by all appearances completely deranged.</p>

<p>He would have stood no better chance of becoming president in the post-Sanford era than before.  Crazy is crazy.  Ironically, this is apparently the hurdle that Sanford would have had to clear, even if his cross-hemisphere affair had not come to light. </p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-25T00:57:13Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067-comment:215377</id>

		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:politics.theatlantic.com,2009://4.20067" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_sanfords_admissions_change_politics.php#comment-215377" />
		<title>Comment from cougarselina on 2009-06-25</title>
		<author>
				<name>cougarselina</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, do you like dating with a cougar? Or are you a cougar yourself? Okay, no matter you are looking for a NSA, FWB or serious relationship. You'll want to check this out:<br />
--==  <a href="http://www.cougarster.com">Cougarster.com</a>  ==--<br />
It's where cougars and younger men can meet(Cougar is the slang for woman who is mature, experienced and want to date with a younger man)~~~</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-25T12:27:48Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>