Politics with Marc Ambinder

« Question Of The Day: What If Daschle Were In Charge? | Main | What Every American Should Be Made To Learn About the IG Torture Report »

Aug 25 2009, 7:30 am

AARP To Republicans: Thanks, But We're Not That Worried

The AARP has seen Republicans' pitch for senior support on health care, and it has not been won over to the GOP's vision of ObamaCare.

Republicans are making a health care pitch to seniors, floating a "Seniors' Health Care Bill of Rights" in an op-ed penned by Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele in the Washington Post yesterday, most likely seizing on the fact that Obama has struggled to woo seniors to his plan and seeking to galvanize a voting bloc against the president's plan. A Gallup poll released late last month showed seniors to be the least likely age group to support health care reform, with many thinking it will reduce their access to care and raise costs.

But the AARP, one of the more powerful lobbying groups in DC, especially on health care, thanked and agreed with Steele on the points of his Bill of Rights--such as no cutting of Medicare and no "dictating the terms of end-of-life care--and said the proposals from President Obama don't threaten to do any of the things Steele suggests seniors should be worried about.

"We are pleased nothing in the bills would bring about the type of scenarios the RNC is concerned about," AARP says.

Opponents of Obama's reforms say they'll cut Medicare; Democrats insist Medicare spending would only be lowered through cutting waste. Based on what it's seen so far, AARP is fully on board with Democrats here: "Nothing we've seen in these bills would cut Medicare benefits," an AARP official said; in a full statement yesterday, the group stressed how Obama's reforms would help Medicare.

Whether AARP supports Obama's reforms has actually been debated in this melee of facts, less-than-facts, and things in between. AARP hasn't endorsed any of the proposals currently in Congress; it's waiting to see a bill at the end of the sausage-making process that's favorable--especially one that deals well with Medicare, from its standpoint. But it's on board with the overall project.

The GOP likely went into this contract-making business knowing the AARP would be hesitant, based on what it's said so far. Prominently on AARP's website, one can find a list of "myths" about how damaging Obama's reforms would be, spread by opponents of the effort--including death panels and the gutting or elimination of Medicare.

Here's AARP Executive Vice President John Rother appearing on MSNBC to talk about Steele's proposal:


Here's the full AARP-released statement from Rother:
"AARP agrees with Chairman Michael Steele's goals for reforming our health care system, and we are pleased nothing in the bills that have been proposed would bring about the scenarios the RNC is concerned about.  Older Americans should not be unfairly burdened by the costs of fixing our broken health care system.  Medicare should not be cut arbitrarily to fund health care reforms that do nothing to help older Americans.  And no one--whether a government bureaucrat or a private health insurer--should come between you and your doctor when making important health care decisions.

"That's why we're supporting provisions in the health care bills that would improve Medicare benefits, including closing the prescription drug program's dreaded doughnut hole--a gap in coverage that forces millions of older Americans to pay the full cost of their prescription drugs on top of their monthly premiums.  Other smart provisions would add needed preventive benefits to Medicare so older Americans can get the screenings and tests they need without worrying about costly bills.  We also support plans to increase pay for doctors with Medicare patients and encourage medical students to go into primary care so that everyone in Medicare can continue to see their own doctor.

"We can pay for these improvements without adding to our deficit by rooting out the waste, fraud and abuse that are driving up older Americans' Medicare premiums and other health care bills.  That means cutting subsidies for private insurers, rewarding hospitals and doctors for providing follow-up care to prevent unnecessary readmissions to the hospital and lowering the skyrocketing costs of prescription drugs that are straining the federal budget and our own wallets.

"AARP will not support a health care bill that cuts Medicare benefits or puts bureaucracy between you and your doctor.  We're glad to have Chairman Steele and his colleagues voice their support for older Americans and we look forward to their support of health care legislation that improves the health care system for Americans of all ages."

Comments (6)

As I have said, the Democrats should sign on to the Senior's Health Care bill of rights. There doesn't seem to be any reason not to sign on, so hopefully we will see this bill pass.

As far as the health care reform, no matter what AARP or other groups say, there are some issues that need to be resolved with it so American's in general feel more comfortable with it. H.R. 3200 is immense, so it will take time to sort it all out. The Senate bill we haven't really seen and make guesses on whats in it.

LarryGeater (Replying to: wynzy)

What will make Americans more comfortable witht the bill is passing a bill that makes their lives better. Wether they like it before it is implemented is irrelevant to both the practical and political concerns of our legislators.

A good reform will be popular. A bad one will not. Those who are looking at what is popular as a sound bite are making bad legislation that will serve the nation and their chances of being re-elected poorly.

We would all be better served if our representatives ignored the public debate and concentrated on serving the public good.

Thank you for correcting the record on all this.

I find it more than a little mystifying to watch the GOP try to demagogue Medicare at this point in time. Maybe it's because I haven't received my "Yes/No Socialism" decoder ring in the mail yet, but I was always under the impression that Republicans hated these kinds of radical empathy-induced programs. I mean, wasn't Bush's big problem that he was such a bleeding heart liberal? And that Americans are sick and tired of Big Government? They're clearly complex creatures, those Republicans, and I, for one, have never seen still waters run so deep.

I'm not sure how much of a record correction this is. AARP has, while not specifically signing on to any bill, been in support of health care reform since the beginning. However, it has not provided as unified a front as it usually does, and many AARP members seem to be upset with how AARP is handling the situation.

http://online.worldmag.com/2009/08/19/aarp-loses-members/

This article does concede the AARP has a substantial turnover rate, but losing 60,000 members based on a single issue seems severe. I'd love to see what the total was for that month.

Either way, it seems clear the AARP leadership has been somewhat in the pocket of the administration and Democrats since the election. What is not clear is how representative this actually is to its membership, many of whom may have serious reservations about the bill. One way or another, it'll be interesting to watch where this goes.

Seniors are least likely to support healthcare reform because they have it made. What they don't realize is that Medicare is a form of "socialized" medicine. I guess they don't want the younger generation covered and they think it is their right to have Government-run insurance. What about those below 65 that are unemployed or work for companies that can't afford to offer health insurance. It boils down to some people thinking about themselves and crying foul. If they are so against a government option, why don't they drop their Medicare coverage. Lets see who will be crying then! This just hypocrisy in its blatant form. That is my $0.02. http://www.mydochub.com

Seniors are least likely to support healthcare reform because they have it made. What they don't realize is that Medicare is a form of "socialized" medicine. I guess they don't want the younger generation covered and they think it is their right to have Government-run insurance. What about those below 65 that are unemployed or work for companies that cant afford to offer health insurance. It boils down to some people thinking about themselves and crying foul. If they are so against a government option, why don't they drop their Medicare coverage. Lets see who will be crying then! This a just hypocrisy in its blatant form. that is my $0.02. http://www.mydochub.com