There were things to admire about Robert Novak, who died today at 78. He was a hard-working reporter long after the age when most journalists have left the field. He was not afraid to be unpopular, which is a deeply impressive quality. He had a loving family. His friends, some of whom I count as friendly acquaintances, say he was actually a nice guy or not as unnice as he seemed. I feel for him, suffering through a brain tumor, which seems like as bad a way to go as any.
But there was a lot in Novak not to like, a mean gruff manner visible to anyone on TV, a stiletto pen that seemed more about destroying than illuminating. I disagreed with his politics but it wasn't his politics which were infuriating. It was his arch, cutting style that made him one of the journalists I wanted to avoid becoming. It was his behavior in the CIA leak case that made me think still less of him.
Our lives were famously entangled. Shortly after Novak published the
name of Valerie Wilson--or Valerie Plame as he identified her by her
maiden name--I wrote a piece for Time called "A War of Wilson?"
Novak had acted as a transmission belt for the malevolent leakers who
sought to trash former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who had the temerity to
criticize the war and report that he had been to the African country of
Niger at the behest of the CIA where his wife worked. My piece noted
that the trashing of Wilson continued. My goal was not to serve as an
open mike for the leakers--which Novak did--but to show them up.
The rest is First Amerndment history. A special prosecutor, Patrick
Fitzgerald, was appointed to pursue who leaked Plame's identity since
exposing her could be a crime. While a slew of journalists--myself, Tim
Russert, Judith Miller, Walter Pincus, Bob Woodward and others--would
be caught up in the case, a constant refrain was What Happened to Novak?
Miller was jailed for 85 days until she divulged her source, Scooter
Libby, who granted her permission to speak. I avoided prison because
Libby and Karl Rove also gave me permission to talk. But all along
Novak said nothing, for two years he maintained a Greta Garbo like
silence. No one knew why he wasn't in legal and mortal jeopardy until
long after the case was over, when he revealed that he had cooperated
with the prosecutor from day one.
The decision to become a government witness isn't an easy one and in
the end, every journalist involved in the case became one. So Novak's sin wasn't the cooperation but his total unwillingness to tell
his readers, and those of us facing jail, what he had done. On one
level, it's amusing that Mr. Tough Guy caved without putting up any
kind of fight. But on another it's just disheartening that he could go
for so long without answering the basic question about whether or not
he was cooperating. According to Novak he chose to remain silent
because the prosecutor had asked him to and because his lawyer advised
such. But all of us in the case were asked by Patrick Fitzgerald to
keep quiet and we were under no such obligations, which is why I wrote
two first hand pieces about the case here and here. A prosecutor must keep grand jury testimony a secret. A participant
need not. My lawyers thoroughly believed that our case would have been
strengthened had we known whether Novak had testified. Novak chose not
to share that little tidbit with his readers or the other journalists
suffering through the case--the case, really, that he started by
disclosing the name of a CIA operative. Throughout the case he pooh
poohed the moral implications of what he had done, made it seem as
though Plame was a clerk when, in fact, the CIA thought enough of her
outing that they brought a criminal referral to the Department of
Justice and denied that the CIA tried to wave him off writing about
her. The case was demoralizing for everyone involved but it seemed worse because of Novak's failure to disclose his role until it was all over.
Novak's worthy of a good biography. His life spanned the rise and fall of modern journalism. His own career was multiplatform long before it was cool. His religious journey from Jew to Protestant to Catholic is interesting and there are a ton of source materials to work with. I hope someone writes it. I'm glad though it won't be me.







Say no evil about the dead but truth about the dead need to be told. Thanks for your write up.
Well, in case anyone wondered, Matt's answered the question: he's the sort of scumbag who pisses on the dead.
Hey, Matt, here's a clue: it really isn't all about you.
And the part that does involve you, that small footnote in Novak's career? It isn't at all like you describe it, in your petty and tendentious way, because it wasn't all about you either.
Hmmm...." My goal was not to serve as an open mike for the leakers--which Novak did--but to show them up." Did I read this right? I'm not sure I understand "showing up leakers" as a goal for good journalism nor do I understand how this makes your writing any different than that of Mr. Novak whom you condemn?
Matt writes:
I've lost track, but didn't we all learn that Novak was leaked by Richard Armitage, and didn't we all think that he was neither malevolent nor intent on trashing Wilson?
stay classy, Cooper
Many will not miss Novak. somehow he eluded being jailed for exposing a CIA agent. There is a related post at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588
Novak was interviewed by Fitzgerald during his investigation. He and Armitage both apparently told the truth to the investigators, otherwise they would have either been indicted or Novak jailed for contempt of court for not revealing his sources. Neither were indicted. The investigation was a joke from that point onwards. Plame's "cover" was blown.
Plame, on the other hand, employed her husband as an intelligence agent in an area in which he had no expertise. Said husband came back with the Niger yellowcake report, which was used as a part of the rationale for the invasion of Iraq. Who was the prevaricator, again? Please refresh my memory.
That is the point. Others faced jail rather then tell their sources. Novak had no ethical qualms about naming names, then, hiding the fact that he did. He was never the target of the investigation. It was the one who leaked the name to the press that was. Mr. Libby made sure the truth could not come out by not co-operating with the investigation, and was pardoned for it. It was no joke that those in high office would obstruct justice.
As for Mrs. Wilson's husband, he was very qualified for the mission. From January 1976 through 1998, Ambassador Wilson was posted in five African nations. He came back with the truth about the 'yellow cake.' It confirmed the same reports from the CIA -- there were no sales. That is why the Bush Whitehouse had to source British reports on the topic. They knew the CIA did not believe it to be factual.
But, when men such as yourself willing to believe fiction over fact, it is easy for public officles to lie and break laws. You can fool some of the people all of the time.
"unnice"? I can't believe you're using '1984' style double-speak. Good luck finding that word in dictionaries.
I might not always have agreed with Bob Novak, but I certainly respected his work. Good reflection.
I suspect Mr. Novak's body is about about 70°F and above ground. Way to use that internet immediacy, Mr. Cooper.
That whole affair was an absolute joke - a real shame that Bush didn't exercise his right to pardon Libby (he did commute his sentence so no jail time was served). The special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, was on a witchhunt and only tried to pin technicalities on Libby after he couldn't get anything on Karl Rove. He was also the prosecutor in that sham of a trial that convicted Conrad Black (while all the other participants got off).
Plame's husband, Joe Wilson, blamed Dick Cheney and Karl Rove for "ordering" the outing of his wife as retaliation for an op-ed he wrote about WMDs. The whole thing was a joke, and according to multiple sources, she wasn't even really a covert agent, and that everyone in Washington knew she worked for the CIA anyway.
Shame about Novak, perhaps the last of a dying breed.
Robert Novak was typical of the type: all bluster on the surface, coward underneath. No doubt RN understood this was to be his legacy...may he RIP
If an entity under Clinton's administion would have leaked the same material as Libby did (under the orders of Cheney) they would have been hung by the rafters for treason by the Republicans. Novak would have led the charge with his columns. It's a double standard that erodes this country.
Matt ...
I was hoping you'd write about Novak today. Nicely done. Would love to get back in touch after all these years. I actually have something I'd like to chat with you about. If you could get in touch, I'd appreciate it.