Politics with Marc Ambinder

« GTMO: Judge Limits Intelligence As Evidence | Main | Liberals And Gut Hatred, Or, Why I'm Sorry I Wrote What I Wrote »

Aug 20 2009, 4:46 pm

Rumsfeld, Townsend Rebuff Ridge

Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge unleashes a slew of revelations in his new book, according to his publisher, but a Bush security adviser says they're overstated.

Ridge's publisher, MacMillan, advertises that Ridge reveals in The Test of Our Times, set for release Sept. 1., that he "effectively thwarted a plan to raise the national security alert just before the 2004 Election"; was instructed to insert text into a speech relating homeland security to "defensive measures away from the U.S." ("read: Iraq," the publisher writes); his efforts to integrate FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) before Hurricane Katrina were shot down; frustrations with the White House for rejecting his proposal to establish Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, DC, and New Orleans; the FBI withheld key information from him; and run-ins with Donald Rumsfeld.

But a Bush security adviser today rebuffed Ridge's claims of politicization and instruction to connect DHS to President Bush's Global War on Terror.

Frances Frago Townsend, who coordinated homeland security matters at the National Security Council under President Bush, said that Ridge is "absolutely wrong" in contending that electoral politics ever played a role in raising or lowering the threat level. 

It was Townsend who established the process that led to the Homeland Security Council making recommendations to President Bush. The meetings, she said today, were often intense, and cabinet secretaries often disagreed with one another. (Incidentally, Karl Rove was never in any meeting to discuss the threat level, according to Townsend.) 

After the debate, Townsend would bring the counsel's consensus recommendation to President Bush. "Never in almost five years at the White House was I aware of the president doing anything but accepting the recommendation of the council," she said. "Politics played no part in any discussion of the council. And I  think the president was better served by virtue of the debate that took place."

As to the specific allegation that Townsend ordered Ridge to insert a line in a speech linking homeland security priorities to Iraq, Townsend said that Ridge had sent the speech in question to the White House, asking for advice. "So I called him said, here's what I think should go in it. It wasn't an order. I didn't regularly see his speeches in advance. He made speeches all the time without running it by us." Late today, a spokesman for former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said that a discussion of the terrorist threat levels was amply justified by the public statements of Al Qaeda members at the time.


" The storyline advanced by his publisher seemingly to sell copies of the book is nonsense.  During the fall of 2004, Usama bin Laden and an American member of al-Qaida released videotapes that said in no uncertain terms that al-Qaida intended to launch more attacks against Americans.  'The streets of America will run red with blood,' al-Qaida warned.  Given those facts, it would seem reasonable for senior administration officials to discuss the threat level.  Indeed, it would have been irresponsible had that discussion not taken place."

Comments (13)

LorenzoStDuBois

Ah, well. Guess we'd better give Townsend the benefit of the doubt, right, The Atlantic Monthly?

This is the sort of contextless "reporting" that does nothing but muddy the waters. Mindless stenography of claims from an unreliable source without bothering to inform readers of the incentives this man has to lie (and for that matter why would Ridge make unfounded accusations, at this point?)--never mind the lack of credibility of any Bush administration lackeys given what we know now. This is why Americans are so misinformed: because you people, journalists, fail at your jobs.

Lol, nice "Staff" byline. Its so delightfully meta to have a CYA byline attached to a CYA "story."

Pwnce (Replying to: Pwnce)

"Incidentally, Karl Rove was never in any meeting to discuss the threat level, according to Townsend."


Hmm, useless aside, seemingly apropos of nothing...unless everyone at The Atlantic shares this verbal tic, I'd bet $1 that Ambinder wrote the above post about an hour before he wrote this one:


"Incidentally, if I am a symbol of everything that is wrong in journalism, then I suggest they are both giving me WAY too much credit."

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/liberals_and_gut_hatred_or_why_im_sorry_i_wrote_what_i_wrote.php

Mindless "journalism" like this is one big reason the establishment media is bleeding readership and viewers, by the way. Ambinder represents a dying (thankfully) breed.

Doctor Cleveland

In other news, G. Gordon Liddy disputes Deep Throat's account of Watergate. And while we're at it, Bill Clinton disputes Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky.

Seriously, Rumsfeld denies abusing his office for political reasons? What a shocker.

This is a perfect example of the difference between what you do and journalism. A journalist would present obviously self-interested claims in context, as presumptively self-interested, and not assign them equal weight with other claims.

You, however, actively go hunting for signs of Ridge's selfish motivations, and present Rumsfeld as uncritically as you can. The obvious agenda is always too obvious for you to score "contrarian" pundit points, so you ignore what is evident to even casual observers.

This is why you were wrong about the war, too.

Way to go "staff"! You've earned your cocktail weenies for this week by dutifully writing down today's Republican talking points.

Way to go "staff"! You've earned your cocktail weenies for this week by dutifully writing down today's Republican talking points.

So now Ambinder becomes the symbolic leader of the "He said she said" contingent made of %99.99 of DC journalists...

Hey Staff, good work! You got a quote from Fran Townsend that serves the purposes of her former bosses interests'? Good job, Staff!

BTW, my favorite Fran Townsend quotes:

“We knew they were going to fly a commercial airliner into the tallest building in California. And it was an analytic judgment by the intelligence community that that meant the Library Tower.”

“It turned out we were all wrong, we had not adequately anticipated, ... The thing that changed this was not Katrina itself, the thing that was the catastrophic event was the failure of the levee.”

“And so our allies in Saudi Arabia face as great, if not a greater, threat by virtue of this escape than we do.” [where 15/19 of the Sept 11th hijackers came from...]

“As you know, President Bush was highly engaged in the preparation and response effort, beginning when Katrina was a tropical storm off the coast of Florida.”

“I should make clear from the outset that we do not know if the bird virus we are seeing overseas will ever become ... a pandemic.”

Fran Townsend is joke. I don't know if she's a liar or not - but she's certainly part of the tragic incompetence I referenced earlier.

Oh, and if I didn't mention earlier - good job Staff!

Doctor Cleveland (Replying to: Pineview1997)

To be fair, the post didn't specify whose staff.

As a press release from say, Dick Cheney's staff, this makes a lot of sense.

No actual reporting of Ridge's arguments, just a rundown of denials from the people he was calling liars in the first place. All rushed into print so fast nobody even noticed that the word you wanted was "rebutted", not "rebuffed." I never expected to find something this shoddy in The Atlantic.