With apologies to Edward Packard and Bantam Books.. (R. A. Montgomery currently publishes CYOA with his company Chooseco, at
www.cyoa.com, and that Choose Your Own Adventure is a registered trademark of Chooseco)
The White House is always accusing the media of treating
health reform like a game. So..
Step 1. The health care system is broken and needs reform.
If you agree with this statement, please go to Step 50.
If you disagree with this statement, please go to Step 50.
Step 2: If you're afraid that ObamaCare will spell the end of
private insurance and be a total disaster, Go to Step 54. If you
support -- in general -- the consensus insurance reforms in the House
and Senate bill, go to Step 3. If you support a single payer system
and are worried that the White House has conceded way too much, go to
step 33.
Step 3: If you believe that, even
with insurance reforms, health care isn't worth the effort unless it
includes a "public option," go to step 5.
If
you believe that "consumer protections," combined with some
cost-cutting measures, higher taxes on the rich, structural reforms and
inducements TBD are good enough, Go to step 4.
Step
4: Congratulations. I've identified you, at heart, as a health care
policy wonk with center-left tendencies. Or, you work in the White
House. Go to step 6.
Step 5: You're outraged that the White House thinks the public plan is negotiable. Go to step 6.
Step
6: House Democrats say that a conference bill without a public option
won't pass their chamber. If you believe their threat, Go to step 8.
If you think they're bluffing, go to step 7.
Step
7. All your focus is on getting to 60 votes in the Senate. If you
think Sen. Ted Kennedy will be able to return to the Senate and cast
the 60th vote, go to Step 8. If you don't think Kennedy will return to
cast the deciding vote, go to Step 9.
Step 8:
You're focusing on a handful of Democrats and a few Republicans. If
you think you should play hardball, go to step 10. If you think you
should let the finance committee, messy as it is, reach a consensus, go
to step 11.
Step 9: If you think 61 votes is
undoable, you decide to take a gamble on the reconcilliation process.
Go to step 35. Else, proceed to step 8.
Step
10: The White House fills in the details: reform is a must. It's a
clarifying issue. When the American people watch the final, final vote,
they're going to view the pro-reform side as being "right," and
senators need to get on the right side of history. If you think this
is sufficient enough, go to step 14. If you think this is an
insufficient threat, go to step 13.
Step 11:
Your base approval rating drops another 10 points. If you think this is
temporary, go to step 12. If you're worried, to back to step 6.
Step 12: Wait a while. Then go to step 16.
Step
13: You have your chief of staff threaten to cut the balls off of any
Democrat who KOs his president's signature item. If you think this
will work, go to step 16. If not, go to step 15:
Step
14: You bargain that the polarization of the health care debate will
diminish over time, and that appeals to logic and reason are
sufficient, and that things will sort themselves out in the end. If
you're confident, go step 16. If not, go back to step 8.
Step 15: You resort to bribery and trickery, are arrested, and thrown into jail. Game over.
Step
16: The Senate falls in line, and passes a health care bill that
includes a government-funded co-op and no public option. The House
passes a bill with a public option. A conference begins.
If
you think this is plausible, go to step 17. If you think the Senate
won't fall in line and won't pass a bill, go to step 20.
Step
17. Stalemate in conference. If you think the conference bill is
reported out WITH a public option, go to step 24. If you think the
conference bill is reported out without a public option, go to step 25.
Step
20: Health care is scrapped for the year. If you agree with James
Carville that the Democrats should punish the Republicans for killing
it, go to step 21. If you think the Democrats should punish the
Democrats for killing it, go to step 22. If you think the Democrats
ought to remain mute, go to step 22.
Step 21: This works. Go to step 40. This doesn't work. Go to step 23.
Step 22: In January of 2010, The Democrats try again. If it works this time, go to Step 16. If it does not, go to step 23
Step
23: Democrats are wiped out in the election of 2010,. having no
accomplishment to show for it. If you think this is a likely scenario,
go to Charlie Cook's symposiums. If you don't, turn on MSNBC. Game
over. Go to Step 61.
Step 24: The House and Senate pass a bill with a public option. Obama has won. Go to Step 61.
Step
25: If you think House liberals will cave, having been sufficiently,
ah, induced, by the White House, go to step 26. If you think they will
hold, go to step 27. If you think the Senate Democrats won't support
the conference report with a public option, go to step 27.
Step 26. Go to step 24.
Step
27: If you think that a permanent stalemate arises, go to step 20. If
you think that a third way compromise can be reached, go to step 28.
Step
28: A third way compromise is reached. If you think that the House
and Senate manage to pass a bill and that Obama will get credit by the
American people and his base for health care reform, go to step 29. If
you think that Obama's "win" will be seen as a loss, go to step 30.
Step
29: Obama, brimming with confidence, ends the year with high approval
ratings again. Democrats, sensing the popularity of the president and
his bill, have something to run on in 2010. Go to step 40.
Step
30. You convene a conference to figure out what Obama should do in 2010
in order to cast his first year and a half as a success. Public opinion
gradually softens over time, and Obama's approval rating creeps up. If
you think it will creep up, go to step 40. If not, go to step 32.
Step
32: 2010 opens with Republicans and Democrats on an even footing, but
President Obama has lost much of his luster, and struggles to regain
the magic. His experiment at political reform -- the Obama project --
has failed. Obama decides to govern as an unreconstructed liberal. If
you think this is a plausible scenario, e-mail me. If not, you recruit
Joe Lockhart and Joel Johnson to take over the White House. Go to Step
61.
Step 33: If you believe that reform ain't
worth the paper it's printed on unless it changes the health care
system to single papyer, go to step 34. If you agree that the
consumer protections are worth having, even if the rest of the bill
totally sucks, go to step 4.
Step 34. The bus to Canada has plenty of open seats. Game over. Go to Step 61.
Step
35. If the Senate parliamentarian is skeptical, go to step 8. If the
Senate parliamentarian lets you wind up with a pretty good bill, many
provisions sunset within five years, and you're consistently fighting
an implementation battle with Republicans. Go to Step 61.
Step
40: Democrats lose, at most, a few seats in the House and one or two in
the Senate. It's possible that they pick up seats in both chambers.
Step
50: You have private health insurance. You develop pancreatic cancer.
Your health insurer won't pay for experimental treatments. Go to Step
51.
You have Medicare. You develop pancreatic
cancer. Treatment is available, but you won't get it for several
months. Go to Step 51.
Step 51: You decide that the health care system is broken and needs reform. Go to step 2.
Step 54: You are probably a Republican, or a conservative independent, or a libertarian.
Step 61: Turns out that the White
House underestimated costs. Congress approves emergency supplemental of
$500-billion and raises Debt Ceiling to $14.5-trillion.
WTF was this? Yes, health care - just like a game. So arch, so knowing, so....Ambinder.
Once again, the Atlantic contributes all that it can to the discussion.
Nice post but this is not a game. The real problem is that lobbyists have taken over the debate as they typically do whenever they get involved. There are a couple of related posts at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588
This article is stupid. Waste of time to read.
Step 50: You have private health insurance. You develop pancreatic cancer. Your health insurer won't pay for experimental treatments.
Why would health insurance pay for experimental treatments????? Its experimental right!!!! Could be a complete waste of money right!!!! Could save your live.... UNLIKELY!!!!
So this whole article breaks down two steps into it. If this is the best thing that you got to prove that our health system is broken.... than it isnt broken.
My health insurance works just fine for me. If you dont have health insurance and want it.... than go purchase some like everyone else. Dont ask me and my kids to pay for it!!!
I agree with you that this article is silly, but I disagree with you on your last statement. Your statement assumes that the uninsured cost you no money at this time. The reality is that whenever an uninsured person goes to the emergency room for expensive live-saving care, which they currently cannot be denied, if they cannot pay then the buck is passed to the provider which passes it on the the insurance company via increased medical costs which passes it on to you via increased premiums. So indirectly, the uninsured are already getting free health care that you are paying for, but it's always expensive emergency room care.
The only way to prevent the uninsured from costing you and your kids money, is to deny them all care if they cannot pay, including emergency care. In other words, pure capitalism where even a human life is just another investment where risks are measured against potential profit to decide our fate. Of course, if this is what those who are against a public option are advocating for, then they should just come out and say it. Otherwise, claiming that a public option will somehow cost you more money than the uninsured are already costing you is ignorant of the overall picture.
BTW, I also have health care and while it works ok, it's doubled in price within the last year. Health care costs will skyrocket to the point that my employer may increase my premiums further, target the most expensive health care users for layoffs (this is already happening without acknowledgment), or find a way to drop benefits and push me into individual health insurance which would cost over double what I currently pay (4x what I paid last year). I support a public option because I can see the writing on the wall. I don't want health care premiums pricing me out of the market because the uninsured have to get their free health care through expensive visits to the emergency room. I don't want my kids to grow up in a world where only the wealthy can afford health insurance while the middle class is left out in the cold.
First off.... about emergency care. I dont think emergency care is that expensive. It cant be... If you break a bone, need stiches, etc... your not going to be out more than a couple hundred bucks. Come on... If its more serious.... and you cant afford to pay.... emergency care should be limited. This will control costs.
Look I lived overseas for 5 years. 2 years in Burma, 1.5 years in Malaysia, and 1.5 years in India. Everything is relative. Each of these countries hospitals will help you in an emergency. Their costs are a whole lot cheaper than ours. I was extremely impressed with the doctors and care provided in India and Malaysia. Its not the same as the US. But good enough if you cant afford health care. The problem here is where to draw the line when it comes to care. I think if you cant afford to pay first world prices for health care than third world quality of services is what you get.... For anyone who morally disagrees than why are you not for providing first world care to third world countries?????
I would like to add... What you are advocating is unrealistic. Just as unrealistic as providing first world care to everyone in the world. Unfortunatly, regualted capitalism is the most efficient and fairest way in handling this. We do not live in utopia.
I don't want to pay your welfare, I don't want to pay for your abortion, I don't want to pay for your food stamps and I DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR YOUR INSURANCE!!!!
If you need it, get it like everyone else or you can go to the current givernment run programs...Oh yeah, THEY SUCK!!! but the Obama program will be different, HAHAHAHAHA.....
Well I don't want to pay for your military campaigns. Unfortunately freedom isn't free. Right? We pay taxes for our common interest. It's not the wild west and even Republican politicians aren't calling for the end to your social security, or medicare, or public school, or environmental protection, or your farm policy, either. So, why won't you pay for my health care? Why of all the industrialized nations, won't America pay for American health care?
Ok... You dont want to pay for my war... I dont want to pay for your health care.... Lets make a deal... You fight my war... I pay for your health care. Join the military!
I don't want to pay your fire dept, your roads, your public schools, your
police dept, your FDA, the health dept to inspect your restaurant, your military to protect your freedom, and your border, your prison system, to lock up those you break your laws,
You're already paying for the uninsured to get free health care. It's called the emergency room, and the uninsured cannot be denied free health care if their life is at stake.
Why not? Thats the problem thats causing health insurance premiums to go up. Limit their services to what the majority of human beings would receive (third world quality of service).
And I didn't want to pay for Bush and Cheney's wars. Did anyone ask me?
verlin003
Way to go on all the compassion for your fellow human beings. Get realistic. A lot us of can't afford the over-inflated unrealistic rates of good health care insurance.
Than go to a third world country like India for service. Its cheaper... if you think that is offensive than why stop at providing every American with free American health care.... Lets provide free American health care for the whole WORLD.
Could we please see the FLOW CHART version of this? I would love that. A picture is worth a 1000 words.
Where is the FLOW CHART?
@verlin003
way to completely miss the point of the article. Pancreatic cancer has a dismal survival rate meaning the normal methods aren't working. This leads doctors to try expiremental methods because they may work better, but insurance usually won't pay for them. Oh yeah if you would have read the liberal option it ends in the national debt increasing in another 500 billion. Its a satire its meant to poke fun at both sides.
So its a technology problem... not a health care problem. Still not good enough reason for me to pay for services that wont probably work.
So you'd want to develop a new technology. Which costs billions of dollars to do, at least in the US. And since the drug companies have to pay for that research, they end up charging everybody more money anyway.
Can't we just let China sink in the research money for it, then steal the technology from them and sell it as generic? They've been doing the same to us for decades.
Yes... at a reasonable pace. Be realistic. There will just be some diseases that you can not do anything realistically about.
Insightful article, and the flowchart could be a viral hit of '09. It gives a little bit of a map ("You are here..") to the political (under)currents that normal folks only see in the rear view mirror. Should make this a poll, and see what our collective un/intelligence says. Some would wonder where the "Death Panels"/derailment option are/is. I'd love a flowchart of the lobbying money...
Personally, the Dems have got to get their act together and get something accomplished. Hopefully something real, but with Obama weakening on the public option, the emphasis seems to be on "something", not necessarily something that will make a real diff.
Insightful article, and the flowchart could be a viral hit of '09. It gives a little bit of a map ("You are here..") to the political (under)currents that normal folks only see in the rear view mirror. Should make this a poll, and see what our collective un/intelligence says. Some would wonder where the "Death Panels"/derailment option are/is. I'd love a flowchart of the lobbying money...
Personally, the Dems have got to get their act together and get something accomplished. Hopefully something real, but with Obama weakening on the public option, the emphasis seems to be on "something", not necessarily something that will make a real diff.
I believe what people, everybody that's satisfied with their current health insurance, are saying is this.
Keep it simple. If you want to cover those not covered, add a 3rd leg to government care. Leg 1: Medicare
Leg 2: Medicaid Leg 3: Public Health insurance.
If one qualifies, one can apply and get their health insurance through the government with all the expected ramifications associated with such a program. Don't FORCE anything on the entire population. This is supposedly a free country, where individuals are free to choose what they want, and not have the government RULE what they MUST have.
So tell the insurance companies to come up with a plan to ensure that everyone in the population is covered, without the possibility of policies being canceled, or that there will have to be a public plan that covers those who can't get private insurance. Make it clear that everyone has to buy insurance, and that rates are independent of pre-existing conditions, age, or anything else. Offer to have the IRS collect the premiums for them - they can do it at very low marginal cost, and they have good mechanisms for squeezing the unwilling. Make it dependent on income, like the income tax - people earning less than x dollars won't pay at all, and payments will depend on income. Tell the insurance companies to find a way to share out the high-risk cases.
you can't "ensure that everyone" is covered because, as it is, millions make the conscious choice to NOT buy coverage for whatever reason. This isn't car insurance, where having coverage can much more easily be mandated.
You cannot force people to buy health insurance any more than you can force those eligible for existing programs to enroll in them any more than you can force illegals out of the country. Those three segments account for the vast majority of the 46 or 44 or 48 or however many million uninsureds there are.
Payments according to income sounds a bit Marxist, don't you think? How about charging according to lifestyle instead? Have the smokers, the overweight, the sloths, the medicated, the stressed pay more than those who take care of themselves.
@jsherman62: Well then I don't want to pay for the roads you drive on, or your kids' schools, or the police that protect your neighborhood, or the firemen that prevent your house from burning down. How about you pay for that all yourself, ok? The rest of the people in this country and I will take care of each other -- isn't that what being a country is all about? If you don't want to join too you could always go live in Antarctica or something all by yourself. Your choice.
And really, the government-run programs suck? Last I heard Medicare had a higher approval rating than private health insurance.
I don't understand the point. there are no moderates anymore who can work out these things, angry mobs at townhall meetings, bordering on violence.
A right wing hate network called fox who further complicates things.
all of these issues have become intertwined with Jesus, guns, prolife, homosexuals, culture wars, country music, patriotism, race, immigration, border wars, jobs, big profit health, corporate lobbies, and a bought and paid for legislative body who sold out the American people,
there are 2 types of right wing republicans, those who make a lot of money and want lower taxes, and the ignorant, who don't read anything, but listen to the guys at the truck stop, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh and Focus on the Family telling them the Government will tell you when to die.
The losers in all of this are the people, with health care taking 20% of GNP, and not much to show for it.
I'm uninsured in the states, I took the bus to Canada, and now have great coverage, not free, we pay for it, $96.00 per month for my wife and I. the same price I pay for private insurance for my 2 dogs.
we have a life expectancy of 81 years, because of Preventative care, and not having to worry about the bills when we get sick.
good luck USA, you deserve better.
Calling All Nerds.
The real problem is that Americans no longer accept that death as a part of life. If you extend the logic to it conclusion, then no matter the cost of a treatment i.e. millions of dollars, every human should be worth that expense to save. That's just not the case.
On the other side of the coin insurance should not be used as a health care plan, it should be used as insurance, in the case of emergency. The insurance that Americans now expect cheaply is so expensive because they use it as a health care plan. There is a difference.
I currently have health insurance that works relatively well, although it limits my hospital choices.
That said, I would still joyfully pay three times or more in taxes if I knew that everyone would have comprehensive coverage.
I know many hard working, frugal, honest people who simply can't afford the premiums and are struggling simply to pay basic bills. Many of them are chronically ill, but can't afford care.
I recently faced a loss of coverage. I did not qualify for state or federal programs. In New York State, to privately purchase a substandard policy cost between $1000 and $1400 per month. A policy comparable to the one that I lost, which was good, but not great, and nowhere near what my elected representatives enjoy, costs $2600 per month.
1. Bargaining pools are a problem. Only mid to large corporations can obtain cheaper rates.
2. Insurance companies generally pay half or less of the submitted amounts. Yet, the uninsured are expected to pay full price.
3. Costs are driven upward by fees per service accorded to physicians. There are a few hospitals that keep physicians on salary. No fees per test and fewer unnecessary tests. I admit that the cost of medical school should be addressed, as well as the cost of malpractice insurance. However, the salary idea works for many. And it might increase the number of general practitioners, which is sorely in need of increase. Trading referrals, or "just checking in" on a patient for 30 seconds and then submitting a fee also drive up costs.
For those who have insurance and are adamant about not paying for anyone else, I'd urge you to think of what you would do if you lost your job, your insurance, your home and were sick. I'd refer all good Republicans to the Bible, which says that as you do unto the least of these, you do unto Christ.
Ours is not to hoard and begrudge. I find it odd that some rant against deadbeats, addicts, Welfare recipients, etc. Yet, those who represent us in Washington or at State government cheat us far more and in greater dollar amounts. Yet, our complaints don't leave them without food, shelter or medical care. There are deadbeats in every society. That doesn't call for us to condemn all for the actions of a few.
Lydia -
Wonderful post, and a real tonic after reading the stuff from verlin003. (Shorter version of his/her stance: "Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses? If they will not go there, then let them die, and decrease the surplus population.")
Like you, I am not afflicted by the delusion that our current system works, or that it is not already saddled with the costs of the uninsured (although it handles them as inefficiently as possible)... much less that American business can regain any sort of solid footing in the global economy if we allow the current system to continue to undermine our competitiveness.
I would cheerfully pay higher taxes if I knew that the revenue gained (A) would ensure that not only I but all my fellow citizens would have health coverage, and (B) would not line the pockets of parasitic insurance executives.
@jsherman62/@verlin003:
Here is breaking news for you: you already pay for everybody's health care - through very inefficient ER visits, 20,000 dead Americans and countless sick due to lack of health care, uncounted thousands sick who lost their coverage once insurance companies discover they had some pre-existing condition, etc. etc. How do you think hospitals/doctors get reimbursed for those visits?
Remember old saying: greedy pays twice. In this case you pay on average $1,000/mo more. Keep paying if you keep screaming (in CAP LETTERS, of course) to stop the reform.
The reality is ... we pay for the uninsured person by increased costs to cover the unpaid bills at hospitals and clinics and unhealthy adults and children.
Everytime I hear people screaming about government spending and taxes - I wonder if they think about where this money goes - police, fire, roads, schools, lights, teachers, to name a few. I don't have children in school - yet I pay taxes for this. I have never had a fire - yet I pay taxes for this. I don't call the police nor have I been arrested or pulled over for any traffic violations - yet I pay taxes for this. I'm fortunate to have insurance and have no problem with paying my share to ensure everyone has health care insurance.
I laugh at the comments I keep hearing ... about keeping the government off my medicare. Hey, this is a government run health care program!
I recommend reading the bill before you jump to conclusions.
Re-post of response to Obama's Op-Ed piece:
As a US citizen, a medical doctor currently living in Germany, a country where health care is universally available for its residents at affordable rates, I might have some perspectives on this debate you haven't yet run across.
What I find most astounding about our US health care system is not only how many people don’t have coverage (some 46 million, and going up). But rather, how fragile and precarious health care coverage is for so many people who think they are well insured.
How does our US health care system compare? Let's go through some important points in the universal health care system in Germany, which I'm very familiar with:
Here in Germany you are mandated to have standard comprehensive health insurance:
your employer pays half the monthly family premium, you pay the other half,
•you don't get rejected because of any previous condition,
•you don't pay more or less working for a large or small business,
•you don’t pay more or less if you are male or female, black or white, German or foreign born, gay or straight,
•the rates don't go up if someone in the small (or large) business gets sick,
•health insurance is not a consideration when changing jobs or careers because you take the policy with you,
•you don’t lose your policy if you get sick, if you become unemployed, or even if your employer goes out of business,
•you won’t be billed for “out of network” services in hospitals or elsewhere - these services are part of your coverage, no matter which hospital or team of doctors treats you,
•you don’t have annual, lifetime, disease-related, or disease-recurrence caps,
•you won’t be billed at 20%, 30% or more for expensive medications (“price-tiered” pharmaceuticals), because there is no "tiering", legally approved pharmaceuticals are fully covered when you need them, even if they're very expensive,
•nor will you ever go bankrupt due to unpaid and unaffordable medical bills piling up, - that simply doesn't happen – you enjoy completely comprehensive coverage.
•Also, forget expensive copays ($40/year max. for doctor visits @$10 per quarter, a few dollars per prescription, a minimal meals expense during a hospital stay.
•Forget too the denials, the constant slog of endless 0800 calls (yours and your doctor’s) to your insurance company for requests for coverage or adjustments, wasting huge amounts of people's time, energy, and productive capacity every business day - this doesn't happen in Germany, because this is a comprehensive coverage system (which is an important reason why it's so efficient).
I might add that Germany is a democratic country with a freely elected government; its residents are free people – this is not "Russia". In fact, this is the country with long stretches of Autobahn without speed limits, right? (Here, it’s your responsibility to drive safely, and most do.) People here freely change jobs, careers, and locations without any regard for health insurance, and they are free of the fear of going bankrupt or losing their homes or life’s savings if they were to get seriously ill, because their comprehensive insurance protects them from that!
Germany and its residents are not going broke paying for this, either. On the contrary, this fair, efficiently run health care system costs roughly a third less per person that the US system - that's right, about 1/3 less per capita – despite (or because?) everyone being on board and receiving comprehensive health care.
That figure doesn’t come from rationing, long waits to see a doctor, or long waiting lists to get an operation, either - that doesn’t happen here. What that figure does reflect, however, is just how much waste, duplication, and gouging of consumers must be taking place in the US health care system every day.
My point in describing the German health care system is not to encourage you all to move to Germany, but to prove to you, that for one-third less money than you currently already spend, you should be getting comprehensive, universal health care, like every resident of Germany does (yes, including all immigrants!). But you're not.
May I humbly suggest: advocate, and work with your friends and neighbors for health care reform now, absolutely including a strong public plan, which is the lynchpin for any meaningful reform.
Don't let the lobbyists, their surrogates on TV, or their gun-toting mobs and pre-organized advocates at town hall meetings, scare you, confuse you, or drown out your voices yet again.
It is time to face up to this national challenge as adults, and finally join the peoples of the 17 (seventeen!) other advanced democracies (not "Russia", but, yes indeed, Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Australia, Japan, S. Korea and even Taiwan!) around the world, who already enjoy the benefits of universal, comprehensive, and affordable health care.
We absolutely can grab this bull by the horns, and get this job done this year!!!
Dr. med. Frederick B. Lacey Jr.
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Re-post of response to Obama's Op-Ed piece in yesterday's NY Times:
As a US citizen, a medical doctor currently living in Germany, a country where health care is universally available for its residents at affordable rates, I might have some perspectives on this debate you haven't yet run across.
What I find most astounding about our US health care system is not only how many people don’t have coverage (some 46 million, and going up). But rather, how fragile and precarious health care coverage is for so many people who think they are well insured.
How does our US health care system compare? Let's go through some important points in the universal health care system in Germany, which I'm very familiar with:
Here in Germany you are mandated to have standard comprehensive health insurance:
*your employer pays half the monthly family premium, you pay the other half,
•you don't get rejected because of any previous condition,
•you don't pay more or less working for a large or small business,
•you don’t pay more or less if you are male or female, black or white, German or foreign born, gay or straight,
•the rates don't go up if someone in the small (or large) business gets sick,
•health insurance is not a consideration when changing jobs or careers because you take the policy with you,
•you don’t lose your policy if you get sick, if you become unemployed, or even if your employer goes out of business,
•you won’t be billed for “out of network” services in hospitals or elsewhere - these services are part of your coverage, no matter which hospital or team of doctors treats you,
•you don’t have annual, lifetime, disease-related, or disease-recurrence caps,
•you won’t be billed at 20%, 30% or more for expensive medications (“price-tiered” pharmaceuticals), because there is no "tiering", legally approved pharmaceuticals are fully covered when you need them, even if they're very expensive,
•nor will you ever go bankrupt due to unpaid and unaffordable medical bills piling up, - that simply doesn't happen – you enjoy completely comprehensive coverage.
•Also, forget expensive copays ($40/year max. for doctor visits @$10 per quarter, a few dollars per prescription, a minimal meals expense during a hospital stay.
•Forget too the denials, the constant slog of endless 0800 calls (yours and your doctor’s) to your insurance company for requests for coverage or adjustments, wasting huge amounts of people's time, energy, and productive capacity every business day - this doesn't happen in Germany, because this is a comprehensive coverage system (which is an important reason why it's so efficient).
I might add that Germany is a democratic country with a freely elected government; its residents are free people – this is not "Russia". In fact, this is the country with long stretches of Autobahn without speed limits, right? (Here, it’s your responsibility to drive safely, and most do.) People here freely change jobs, careers, and locations without any regard for health insurance, and they are free of the fear of going bankrupt or losing their homes or life’s savings if they were to get seriously ill, because their comprehensive insurance protects them from that!
Germany and its residents are not going broke paying for this, either. On the contrary, this fair, efficiently run health care system costs roughly a third less per person that the US system - that's right, about 1/3 less per capita – despite (or because?) everyone being on board and receiving comprehensive health care.
That figure doesn’t come from rationing, long waits to see a doctor, or long waiting lists to get an operation, either - that doesn’t happen here. What that figure does reflect, however, is just how much waste, duplication, and gouging of consumers must be taking place in the US health care system every day.
My point in describing the German health care system is not to encourage you all to move to Germany, but to prove to you, that for one-third less money than you currently already spend, you should be getting comprehensive, universal health care, like every resident of Germany does (yes, including all immigrants!). But you're not.
May I humbly suggest: advocate, and work with your friends and neighbors for health care reform now, absolutely including a strong public plan, which is the lynchpin for any meaningful reform.
Don't let the lobbyists, their surrogates on TV, or their gun-toting mobs and pre-organized advocates at town hall meetings, scare you, confuse you, or drown out your voices yet again.
It is time to face up to this national challenge as adults, and finally join the peoples of the 17 (seventeen!) other advanced democracies (not "Russia", but, yes indeed, Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Australia, Japan, S. Korea and even Taiwan!) around the world, who already enjoy the benefits of universal, comprehensive, and affordable health care.
We absolutely can grab this bull by the horns, and get this job done this year!!!
Dr. med. Frederick B. Lacey Jr.
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Just to show how smart you are a game with a dozen of steps would suffice...
Marc, this post is a perfect representation of inside the beltway cynicism, one of the main reason this country is in such big trouble...
dsmythe -
Thank you for this. A clear, thorough, sensible response that every reader should forward to his/her representatives and administration.
Nerdy, nostalgic, amusing and offensive to the semi-literate. This post has it all.
ambi,
what's w/u? you are writing crap. it's not funny, not interesting, it's just stupid garbage.
quit while you're behind.
First off.... about emergency care. I dont think emergency care is that expensive. It cant be... If you break a bone, need stiches, etc... your not going to be out more than a couple hundred bucks. Come on... If its more serious.... and you cant afford to pay.... emergency care should be limited. This will control costs.
Look I lived overseas for 5 years. 2 years in Burma, 1.5 years in Malaysia, and 1.5 years in India. Everything is relative. Each of these countries hospitals will help you in an emergency. Their costs are a whole lot cheaper than ours. I was extremely impressed with the doctors and care provided in India and Malaysia. Its not the same as the US. But good enough if you cant afford health care. The problem here is where to draw the line when it comes to care. I think if you cant afford to pay first world prices for health care than third world quality of services is what you get.... For anyone who morally disagrees than why are you not for providing first world care to third world countries?????
Killing health care reform has always been easier than creating consensus (especially if you're willing to demagogue the issue with "death panels"). But amid all the screaming, here's a point that adds important contextual ballast: Americans don't really think their health care is so hot. For the first time in history, a conservative talk show host is going to allowed to broadcast directly from the White House, as President Obama has invited Michael Smerconish to do exactly that. Michael Smerconish is not a centrist who happens to lean Republican, he is a dyed in the wool conservative, and he has voted Republican all his life. He voted for Barack Obama in 2008. The President will hold the broadcast in the Diplomatic Reception Room, where the Fireside Chats are held, and will field questions largely about health care reform. It's hard to believe Michael Smerconish is going to the White House – Limbaugh couldn't get in, no matter how much fast cash he offered.
About health care http://ntpills.com/