Politics with Marc Ambinder

« Recess Watch: Dingell Berated | Main | Why The Brawls of August Are Good »

Aug 7 2009, 4:26 pm

An Iraqi Smoking Ban: Where Can GIs Light Up?

Iraq's cabinet approved new anti-smoking legislation. The law bans smoking in public spaces, marketing of tobacco, and Iraqis under age 18 from buying and smoking cigarettes. It's a bold yet laudatory act, given the prevalence of tobacco in the country:

Smoking is widespread in Iraq, with a packet of cigarettes costing only around 500 dinars and cafes providing "sheesha", as water pipes with flavoured tobacco are known, popular in cities and towns.

More than 41 percent of Iraqi men and nearly seven percent of women are smokers, according to the World Health Organisation.

This move recalls similar anti-smoking bans enacted at both the federal and state levels in the United States. American smokers who called such legislation "anti-democratic" might find this undertaking by the Iraqi cabinet ironic: after all, the current legislative body is a product of the ongoing Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The high-percentage of Iraqi smokers indicates that this new law will be a lifestyle disruption for much of the population. What remains unclear, however, is how it will affect the cigarette-smoking American soldier.  

A 2008 story on NPR gives the estimate that over two-thirds of the soldiers stationed in Iraq light up on a regular basis (other studies instead estimate one-third of soldiers--still a higher percentage than that found among civilian Americans). Since American soldiers in Iraq cannot smoke inside base buildings, the new Iraqi law presumably further limits their smoking space. Though there is no disputing the long-term negative effects of tobacco use, it is also true that many soldiers rely on cigarettes for stress-relief. Given the upward trend in military suicides, this encroachment on smoking space provokes concern.

And this is not an issue that will be disappearing soon: a few weeks ago the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs urged the Defense Department to enact anti-smoking laws within the armed services:

...a complete ban on tobacco, which would end tobacco sales on military bases and prohibit smoking by anyone in uniform, not even combat troops in the thick of battle.

Comments (8)

Big Pharma strikes again! How many millions did this deal with the Iraqi government cost them? They are quite busy in Jordan as well:

Pfizer holds an anti-smoking workshop for Al-Kawn and Al-Faridah staff members

http://www.ameinfo.com/202894.html

Smoking is a filthy, poisonous, disgusting habit with absolutely no redeeming qualities and many proven health concerns, and if the day ever comes that it is banned completely and tobacco farms are plowed under and put to other uses, I will celebrate. Of course it will never happen, but in the meantime, any attempt to make smoking as inconvenient, expensive, and unpleasant as possible is more than welcome.

Big government has NO business dictating health measures to the members of a democracy. At most, regulating the marketing of an admittedly addictive commodity such as cigarettes may be tolerable on the outside as part of the Constitution's mandate for government to promote the common welfare - but the line is sharply drawn at regulation of individual conduct. Or it ought to be.

If a certain level of avoidable illness is the consequence of zealous protection of individual rights from the government's do-gooders, so be it. Just remember that those men out there protecting our national interests have a much shorter life expectancy than those of us sitting here in the States at our computers - cigarette smoking's health concerns are and ought to be the last thing they have to stress over.

Jeff (Replying to: loupgarous)

I dont want to inhale other peoples smoke or pay medical expenses for their eventual cancer/hearth disease.

will the DoD policy apply to the commander-in-chief?

With apologies to Fawlty-

Sybil Fawlty: Basil doesn't [smoke] anymore,
[to Basil]
Sybil Fawlty: do you?
Basil Fawlty: No, that particular avenue of pleasure has been closed off.
Sybil Fawlty: And we don't want it opened up again, do we?
Basil Fawlty: No, you don't dear.

The government should better put heavy taxes on cigarettes and use the money to provide basic services, i.e. better roads, electricity and water.

Saternius, from Fashion Advises

The government should better put heavy taxes on cigarettes and use the money to provide basic services, i.e. better roads, electricity and water.

Saternius, from Fashion Advises