The public option likely won't make it out of the Senate Finance Committee when it's put to a vote this week (though it could come back on the floor). Meanwhile, major polls show that most Americans want one. Is this a case of the legislature not giving the people what they want? If so, is there anything wrong with it?
« The Sunday Shows In Five Sentences Or Less | Main | Controversy Brews Around National Equality March »
Sep 28 2009, 6:30 am by Chris Good
Question Of The Day: But People Want A Public Option...
Comments (9)
| RSS ![]()
Today's Headlines From The Atlantic
technology Pac Rat
The fight to save video games from bit rot
china Cyber Warriors
The battle to protect our infrastructure from hackers
column Prison Porn
"Lockup" is exploitative and debasing
VOICES
How Do You Know Whether You Are Winning A War? 2.10.10 8:55 A.M.
Shoe, Meet the Other Foot, Part II 2.9.10 5:19 P.M.
Vernon Ehlers To Retire 2.10.10 9:28 A.M.
"Choker Manning" 2.10.10 9:00 A.M.
On the cyber-threat from China 2.10.10 2:40 A.M.
Who is This Angry Arab? 2.10.10 8:32 A.M.
Liberal condescension 2.9.10 1:48 P.M.
Recent posts by Marc Ambinder
- Even Schumer Is Suffering
- Pentagon To Announce End To Third Party Outings
- The Sevugan v. Conant Budget Super-clash
- Obama's Secret Wiretap Memo
- Why Did Justice Delay The Yoo/Bybee Report?
Recent posts by Chris Good
Weekly
Author
- Andy Johnson
- Jodie Allen and Richard Auxier
- Adam Minter
- Andrew Sullivan
- Bob Cohn
- Brian Goldsmith
- Scott Bland and Ronald Brownstein
- Benjamin Lockwood
- Conor Clarke
- Clive Crook
- Chris Geidner
- Chris Good
- Cameron Joseph
- Clement Tan
- Chris VanBuren
- D.B. Grady
- Daniella De Franco
- Daniel Indiviglio
- Derek Thompson
- Gautham Nagesh
- Gautham Nagesh
- James Fallows
- James Bennet
- James Gibney
- Joshua Green
- Jeannette Lee
- Jenny Merkin
- Justin Miller
- James Warren
- Jim Kessler and Anne Kim
- Kerry Golds
- Katharine Rust
- Lisa Camner
- Marc Ambinder
- Matthew Cooper
- Megan Hupp
- Max Fisher
- Mara Gay
- Mackie Jimbo
- Michael Kinsley
- Megan McArdle
- Nicole Allan
- Rachael Brown
- Ross Douthat
- Regina Herzlinger
- Ronald Brownstein
- Reihan Salam
- Shane Harris
- Shauna Miller
- Staff
- Tony Lee
- Will DiNovi
Monthly
Category
- CBS News Politics
- Trippi
- FiveThirtyEight.com
- The Daily Beast
- Drudge Report
- Instapundit
- NJ's Political Stock Exchange
- Law: Executive Watch
- Steve Coll
- Politics: A-NES
- MSNBC's First Read
- Laura Rozen
- ProPublica
- The Fix
- Politico's Smith
- Shadow Government
- Dave Catanese's blog/KY3-TV
- Global Affairs
- Greg Sargent's TPMEC
- The Frontal Cortex
- 3 Quarks Daily
- Neurophilosophy
- Environment: Grist
- Overcoming Bias
- Pollster.com
- Radio Iowa (O. Kay!)
- A Daily Shot (and Chaser)
- The Cable
- Arms Control Wonk
- Nukes Of Hazard
- Mark Halperin's "The Page"
- Huffington Post Politics
- Fred Malek
- Nukes and Spooks
- Bob Bauer
- Hotline On Call
- The Stump
- NHNewslinks.com
- Prof. Dante Scala
- Robert Bluey
- NH2008.com
- Matt Lewis
- Patrick Ruffini
- CT Blog
- CQ's Jeff Stein
- Not Just Markos
- FAS Secrecy Blog
- The Buzz
- Wilshire And Washington
- Political Muscle
- Political Wire
- Arts and Letters Daily
- The Garance
- Wired's Danger Room
- Jake Tapper
- Pop Sugar
- Political Punch
- Greg Mankiw
- Captain's Quarters
- Marginal Revolution
- Mind Hacks
- Opinion Journal
- ARDA
- Virginia Postrel
- The Reality-Based Community
- Science Daily
- News @ Nature
- Retrospectacle
- Pharyngula
- The Airline Blog
- Cognitive Daily
- ThinkProgress
- Wonkette
- The Corner
- Clive Davis
- Kevin Drum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Intel Dump
- The Plank
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Debka File
- Angry Asian Man
- AmericaBlog
- The Washington Note
- Obsidian Wings
- NYT's The Caucus
- Michael Barone
- SCOTUS Blog
- How Appealing
- Above The Law
- ACS Blog
- The Washington Independent
- Law Dork
- Ezra Klein
Home | Atlantic FAQ | Masthead | Site Guide | Subscribe | Subscriber Help
Atlantic Store | Educational Program | Jobs/Internships | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Feedback | Advertise
Copyright © 2010 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.






Major polls "show" no such thing.
As Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com observed in a terrifically informative post (Aug 27, 2009), there is a high level of ignorance about the meaning of public option-- even among pollsters---and small changes in the wording of questions lead to dramatic shifts in the levels of public support:
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/08/poll-most-dont-know-what-public-option.html
.......Actually they do consistently show substantial majority support for a public option......they may be muddled about the precise definition of a public option but that's something totally different...... even if they are not quite sure what it is, they clearly want it........It may have been terrifically informative to you but the revelation that changing the wording of questions affects the outcome of answers is polling 101.....which is why most of these narrow issue polls are fairly worthless......I doubt we'll see a public option out of Baucus's committee but it's almost certain it will be in the final bill that will be cherry picked from the five house and senate bills.......then it will pass on reconciliation to much spurious whining from Republicans......that's the way it was always going to be.......and since the public by a large majority think most of the reaching out has been done by Obama and the Republicans are playing politics there will be no political price to pay.......and guess what......when it's passed it's going to be very popular......or was Bill Kristol wrong all along.
ottovbvs: I think we assign different meanings to "clearly want."
To me, the statement: "the public does not understand much about what X entails, but I am confident the public clearly wants X because a majority of individuals polled responded positively to a highly incomplete, one sentence question that purported to describe X (which cannot be adequately described in one sentence)" is nonsensical.
.....It has nothing to do with my confidence so don't misquote me......a mass of polls show clear majorities for the public option...even if people don't clearly understand all the small print....it may by nonsensical to you but it's a simple fact that thats what the polls show......hence your original comment was simply wrong......blustering and confusing different issues can't obscure that simple fact!!
It's the Senate, not the legislature as a whole, that's not giving the people what they want. And what is unique about the Senate? One, it magnifies the votes of tiny agrarian states at the expense of places where people actually live, and two, the filibuster rules (by which everything now seems to operate now, sigh) also magnifies the power of a minority. It just so happens that at this moment these two anti-small-d-democratic features are currently aligned so that they benefit the party of no.
But then being democratic was never the goal of the framers of the Constitution. Rather they wanted a republic that would preserve the rights of white propertied males, also slaveholders.
And is this a problem? Yes, of course it is. When large corporate interests can pressure and influence our representatives against the collective interest - that's a systemic problem.
I don't think the polls show any such thing.
People support the public option in the abstract but are unsure about whether any specific legislation actually does what they want. Thus with all health care reform, and with any widely-wished change in general--getting people to sign onto a specific and concrete plan is much harder.
That said, yes people want a public option, and if Dems were smart they'd pass a solid bill that included one and made a visible difference for people. Even Bill O'Reilly can see where this would help non-millionaires, for heaven's sake.
People want a lot of things. I want a new car, a new house, new furniture, etc., etc. But, can I afford those things? Pollsters should include deficit-related questions when they ask people if they favor the "public option."
I still think the best plan out there is the Wyden-Bennett Healthy Americans Act, which is deficit neutral, as scored by the CBO. Most people are just refusing to talk about it.
Former Clintonites, Lanny Davis and Matt Miller both favor the Wyden bill.
http://www.miamiherald.com/1280/story/1222961.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lanny-davis/the-wyden---bennett-healt_b_293117.html
The majority that understands what the public option is and don't view it as "free ice cream" do not want it - period.