Politics with Marc Ambinder

« Sarah Palin, Worst Veep Pick Ever? Not So Fast. | Main | Hope Fades »

Nov 24 2009, 3:53 pm

Possible Casualties Of The GOP Purity Test

A handful of conservative Republican National Committee members are circulating a resolution that would block RNC funding from candidates who agree with fewer than eight of 10 principles, and Hotline OnCall's Reid Wilson notes that this would nix party cash for some top GOP Senate candidates in 2010: namely, Reps. Mike Castle (R-DE) and Mark Kirk (R-IL), Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and, Crist's camp might say, conservative star Marco Rubio, for his records on immigration and cap & trade.

The list of mandatory tenets includes opposition to President Obama's health care reform effort, cap & trade, "government funding of abortion," and gun control.

It could also preclude RNC funding for the GOP's two most moderate senators--Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, neither of whom are up for reelection in 2010--particularly depending on how they vote on abortion amendments to the Democratic health care bill during the amendment process, as language that's less restrictive than Rep. Bart Stupak's (D-MI) pro-life-favored House amendment is likely to come up. The language favored by pro-choicers, which they agreed to in the House, is considered by some pro-lifers to constitute government funding of abortions, since it would allow federal subsidies to be used to pay premiums on health care plans that cover abortions, despite an accounting firewall that would prevent the federal money from actually paying for any abortions.

Both Snowe and Collins voted for the stimulus, and both get a 93 percent scores from Planned Parenthood on pro-choice votes. Snowe generally supports cap & trade, is a co-chair of the International Climate Change Task Force, voted for cloture on the McCain/Kennedy immigration overhaul in 2007, and gets a career D- from NumbersUSA on "amnesties" for illegal immigrants. Collins, meanwhile, also supports cap & trade in a general sense and gets a career D from NumbersUSA on "amnesties," though she consistently voted against the McCain/Kennedy bill.

Comments (9)

How about Republicans issue an IQ test - anyone scoring above 100 can't join the party.

Hughes (Replying to: Candide)

This rule wouldn't change the membership in any way.

Michael (Replying to: Candide)

If this data is correct, they've already taken that step.

http://www.abluestar.com/utilities/rndimages/?go=23

Someone's not reading their comments!

Yesterday, I linked to my post about the resolution in which I pointed out that the immigration provision is deceptive (and probably intentionally so).

Almost all top GOP pols would pass the imm. provision, since none of them support amnesty, even those who do. For the video explanation, here's McCain claiming he doesn't support amnesty, despite the fact that he did and does. That's from 2007 and maybe sometime next decade the MSM will acknowledge the word games some people try to play and call them on it. OK, maybe next century.

Buzz Feedback (Replying to: 24AheadDotCom)

I think they should build the border fence just as long as you're on the other side of it when they finish.

MSM stooges can go to kissmyass.com for more!

The People's Front of Judea never accomplished anything until they expunged that damned Judean People’s Front out of the movement. Splitters!

I like this list of tenets, but I think you can still drill these down to just a few axiomatic values -- WAR IS PEACE, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH and, in a somewhat novel twist, OPPOSITION IS SUPPORT.

Kevin B (Replying to: les)

How about SEDITION IS PATRIOTISM?

I always considered my self a conservative, my father was a hard-core republican and most of my family were what you would consider right leaning. The last eight years showed us that the republicans have gone too far. Even my father voted democrat for the first time in my lifetime. I have a sister who has turned to the Libertarian Party. The base of the Republican Party have become extremists and I want no part of that anymore.

Ronald Reagan said, "We should emphasize the things that unite us and make these the only ‘litmus test’ of what constitutes a Republican: our belief in restraining government spending, pro-growth policies, tax reduction, sound national defense, and maximum individual liberty. As to the other issues that draw on the deep springs of morality and emotion, let us decide that we can disagree among ourselves as Republicans and tolerate the disagreement."

Can you imagine Palin/Gingrich/Cheney/Limbaugh saying anything like that? No.