If health care reform doesn't pass by the end of the year, will the political will behind it fall apart? What changes for health care if Congress leaves for the holidays without putting a bill on President Obama's desk?
« The Rundown, 11/5 | Main | 2010 Leanings: Generic House Ballot Sways Back To Democrats »
Nov 5 2009, 6:30 am by Chris Good
Question Of The Day: What If Health Care Doesn't Pass In 2009?
Comments (7)
Post a comment
| RSS ![]()
Today's Headlines From The Atlantic
religion Did Christianity Cause the Crash?
Preachers spread a gospel of debt
books Books of the Year
The 25 best in a crowded field
college football Ground War
Army's best option to finally beat Navy
- Can We Afford the Afghan War?
- Murdoch and Microsoft Team Up Against Google
- On Health Care Reform, One Hurdle Down, Many to Go
VOICES
Hitting The Cost Curve's Guardrails 11.23.09 12:21 P.M.
Parsing the Senate Debate on Health Care 11.23.09 11:29 A.M.
Huckabee Wins Iowa...Poll 11.23.09 12:39 P.M.
Photos For College Apps 11.23.09 11:00 A.M.
Rhodes pushback 11.22.09 11:27 P.M.
Sarah Palin and the Rapture 11.20.09 1:23 P.M.
How to do a second stimulus 11.20.09 1:27 A.M.
Recent posts by Marc Ambinder
- Thought The NRSC Wasn't Going To Help Its Candidates Who Face Primaries?
- Interview: The Club For Growth Ascendent
- Respinning Virginia: Forget The Obama Surge Voters
- The Great Political Sort Continues
- NY 23, Palin 0, Erick Erickson 1
Recent posts by Chris Good
Weekly
Author
- Jodie Allen and Richard Auxier
- Adam Minter
- Andrew Sullivan
- Bob Cohn
- Scott Bland and Ronald Brownstein
- Benjamin Lockwood
- Conor Clarke
- Clive Crook
- Chris Geidner
- Chris Good
- Cameron Joseph
- Clement Tan
- Chris VanBuren
- D.B. Grady
- Daniella De Franco
- Daniel Indiviglio
- Derek Thompson
- Gautham Nagesh
- Gautham Nagesh
- James Fallows
- James Bennet
- James Gibney
- Joshua Green
- Jeannette Lee
- Jenny Merkin
- Justin Miller
- James Warren
- Jim Kessler and Anne Kim
- Kerry Golds
- Katharine Rust
- Marc Ambinder
- Matthew Cooper
- Max Fisher
- Mara Gay
- Michael Kinsley
- Megan McArdle
- Nicole Allan
- Rachael Brown
- Ross Douthat
- Regina Herzlinger
- Ronald Brownstein
- Reihan Salam
- Shane Harris
- Shauna Miller
- Staff
- Tali Yahalom
- Will DiNovi
Monthly
Category
- CBS News Politics
- Trippi
- FiveThirtyEight.com
- The Daily Beast
- Drudge Report
- Instapundit
- NJ's Political Stock Exchange
- Law: Executive Watch
- Steve Coll
- Politics: A-NES
- MSNBC's First Read
- Laura Rozen
- ProPublica
- The Fix
- Politico's Smith
- Shadow Government
- Dave Catanese's blog/KY3-TV
- Global Affairs
- Greg Sargent's TPMEC
- The Frontal Cortex
- 3 Quarks Daily
- Neurophilosophy
- Environment: Grist
- Overcoming Bias
- Pollster.com
- Radio Iowa (O. Kay!)
- A Daily Shot (and Chaser)
- The Cable
- Arms Control Wonk
- Nukes Of Hazard
- Mark Halperin's "The Page"
- Huffington Post Politics
- Fred Malek
- Nukes and Spooks
- Bob Bauer
- Hotline On Call
- The Stump
- NHNewslinks.com
- Prof. Dante Scala
- Robert Bluey
- NH2008.com
- Matt Lewis
- Patrick Ruffini
- CT Blog
- CQ's Jeff Stein
- Not Just Markos
- FAS Secrecy Blog
- The Buzz
- Wilshire And Washington
- Political Muscle
- Political Wire
- Arts and Letters Daily
- The Garance
- Wired's Danger Room
- Jake Tapper
- Pop Sugar
- Political Punch
- Greg Mankiw
- Captain's Quarters
- Marginal Revolution
- Mind Hacks
- Opinion Journal
- ARDA
- Virginia Postrel
- The Reality-Based Community
- Science Daily
- News @ Nature
- Retrospectacle
- Pharyngula
- The Airline Blog
- Cognitive Daily
- ThinkProgress
- Wonkette
- The Corner
- Clive Davis
- Kevin Drum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Intel Dump
- The Plank
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Debka File
- Angry Asian Man
- AmericaBlog
- The Washington Note
- Obsidian Wings
- NYT's The Caucus
- Michael Barone
- SCOTUS Blog
- How Appealing
- Above The Law
- ACS Blog
- The Washington Independent
- Law Dork
- Ezra Klein
Home | Atlantic FAQ | Masthead | Site Guide | Subscribe | Subscriber Help
Atlantic Store | Educational Program | Jobs/Internships | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Feedback | Advertise
Copyright © 2009 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.






Health care? Nothing. The caregivers, doctors, nurses, dentists, etc, will continue to provide the best care they can give.
The politics of control, over your choices, over the prices, over the demand, over the supply, well that's to be seen. But, I doubt it'll be anything close to what the dems on the fringes want.
I thought the HCR had already failed because there are now 2 republican governors that can vote against it.
Each week, as elections loom closer, PelosiCare becomes harder to pass. That's what Our President gets for dithering.
If HCR doesn't pass in 2009, it will become harder to pass in 2010 - but the underlying issues that created the burning platform will not magically disappear. They'll get worse, more acute. More uninsured. Rising costs.
What changes for health care? Nothing. The bill's reforms are already planned to be years in the future anyway, right? Gutless Washington - per usual.
I would say it would illustrate the inability of the current democratic leadership to govern. No more no less.
For any tough issue (wars, health care reform, financial institution reform, civil rights), there is never a "good" time. People will always suggest you slow down, or scale you plan back.
Politicians in general, and democrats specifically, are afraid of losing. So they will almost always chose half measures over any bold initiative.
That above or the influence of money in our political systems are probably the greatest obstacles to real reform.
Some say I am a dreamer....but maybe, just maybe...
We will get people who are serious about health CARE reform and not destroying the health INSURANCE industry and they will sit down and come up with a plan that makes sense...
Here are some novel ideas...
-Reduce the costs to medical professionals and institutions (tort reform)
-Less reliance on pay per procedure and more reliance on flat salary to encourage medical personnel to spend more time with the individual patient rather than see how many services they can provide in a day
-Establish a way that existing medical record keeping software can be exchanged safely and securely. Schools have a system called the School Interoperability Framerwork (SIF) that provides this. The Internet came about because defense institutions and universities need a way to do that. It can be done at relatively low cost if current systems do not need a complete overhaul.
-Provide a system that will open up opportunities for citizens to choose among a variety of plans. This would be the exchange system that has been talked about it. But the government's role should be coordinating the exchange and encouraging participation, NOT providing one of the plans.
The president campaigned on change and on bipartisanship. If he wants to get something passed he needs to show he is serious about those two issues. You can't show you are bipartisan by telling Reid and Pelosi they are in charge because they have showed no inclination that they are willing to work with the other side. I mean, get real, having meeting room locks changed so Republicans can't access the planning?
I think the longer it is not passed, especially if they manage to actually complete a bill, the more difficult passing legislation will become. It will give opponents an actual target to aim for, and there will certainly be plenty of targets in a 2,000+ page bill written by anyone in Congress, let alone solely written by 1 party.
Agreed with Paul in Athens that health CARE will not change, because this is not longer about health care reform. As someone in medical school now, you can believe me when I tell you none of this debate has affected what I am taught. It is unfortunate, because looking from the inside out, I can see a lot of potential for actual reform, rather than expansion that hopes to get enough people to reform, maybe, some day.