Politics with Marc Ambinder

Marc Ambinder

Marc is an associate editor at the Atlantic, where he curates its influential political channel and contributes to the magazine. He is also a contributing editor to National Journal. In late 2007, he was named chief political consultant to CBS News. Marc spent a year and a half at the Hotline, where he was the founding editor of "Hotline On Call," a pathbreaking political news blog. He was a producer and reporter for the ABC News Political and was one of the founders of ABC's "The Note.” He's a 2001 graduate of Harvard and lives in Washington, D.C.

Recently by Marc Ambinder

Nov 22 2009, 2:13PM

Did The Chinese Watch Obama's Town Hall?

Ten days before President Obama arrived in China, the U.S. government's massive advance party was upped by one: a member of the White House New Media team began to work with the U.S. embassy and Shanghai University officials on a November 16 town hall meeting where 400 pre-selected students would participate.   The White House was under no illusion that the give-and-take would be free from the red pen of Chinese television and internet censors. The town hall was not broadcast on Chinese television.

But neither did they wish to pass up an opportunity to communicate directly with the Chinese people, a White House official said.  This was the fourth iteration of the White House new media team's global engagement. It started in March with the president's YouTube message on Norwuz.   Then came the President's town hall meeting with students in, Turkey, where the White House quietly partnered with a Turkish social media firm to promote viewing among young Turks. White House outreach for the President's speech to the Muslim world in Egypt was similarly extensive, and it included plenty of pre-speech negotiations with Arab television networks and internet sites.

The China gig was tricky, given the practicalities of internet communication in China and the reality of a very sensitive host government.  But something seems to have worked: of about 200,000 live stream requests, 120,000 were from China. (67,000 were from the United States.)  The number of peak concurrent users suggested that there was no sudden drop-off or bottleneck, which would have suggested a concerted censorship effort by the Chinese government.

More

Nov 22 2009, 11:21AM

The Sunday Shows In Five Bullet Points... And Glenn Beck!

1.   A Senate of Four: Well, there's Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT). He says that the bill will change -- and significantly.   Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) says that he'd vote to prevent the current health care bill from being taken off the floor -- and has presented a list of demands to Sen. Harry Reid.  No "CLASS" Act -- this is the federal long-term insurance care provision, which Nelson thinks is a Ponzi scheme. No abortion coverage... and no public option. Still, on This Week, he said that he's confident that the bill can be improved on the floor.

Republicans are calling the machinations that resulted in Sen. Mary Landrieu voting yes the "Louisiana Purchase," because Harry Reid promised her state about $300 million for Medicare. On Face the Nation, Sen. Jon Kyl mocked Landrieu: ""You haven't heard the Republicans say 'here is my price. "The American people don't like that. It should be on the merits."

"Rather than drop an issue that is so important to Arkansas working families and small businesses, I intend to vote to open debate on a health care bill that will undergo several changes in the days and weeks ahead," Sen. Blanche Lincoln wrote to supporters. Lincoln's vote made the C-6 prime real estate in the Arkansas Democratic-Gazette. Lincoln won a 72-hour reading period to study the final bill before passage.

More

Nov 21 2009, 7:40PM

The Quest For 60

A curated list of the 30 top #HCR Twitterers as the Senate debates health care reform legislation.

Nov 20 2009, 2:26PM

Cleaning the Inbox on Fridays

Pretty interesting polling numbers for Sen. Blanche Lincoln and John McCain. Throw in the trouble brewing in SC for Lindsay Graham, and that poll after poll, and Tim Geinther's pounding on The Hill, shows people think government is helping Wall Street and big corporations and not them, and you have wonder when the Democratic unity damn breaks wide open and everyone runs for cover. 

The Four Holdouts -- Lieberman, Lincoln, Mary Landreiu and Ben Nelson. The most compelling Saturday night drama since ... the Golden Girls. Actually, Ben Nelson is out. He's actually in. He'll vote to allow debate to proceed. And since it's been revealed that Landreiu wants Harry Reid to raise money for her next month, let's presume she's a "yes" vote. And Lieberman ... is Lieberman. 

A victory for Ron Wyden
: a version of his "Free Choice" amendment will appear in the Senate health care bill. Under the legislation now, Americans "with employer-provided coverage, whose income is below 400 percent of the federal poverty level and whose premiums are between 8 and 9.8 percent of their total income will be exempt from having to purchase health coverage but will not be able to access the exchange to qualify for government assistance to purchase insurance. " Wyden's amendment means that these folks can use their employer health subsidies -- currently tax free -- to buy an insurance plan in the exchange.

This:  well -- it's been a month of sausage making, and as we learned in July, when the sausage is in the oven, Obama can't escape the taint of partisanship that Americans seem to be rebelling against.

image001.gif

Nov 20 2009, 2:21PM

For Your Entertainment: Zolitics

From the political consultants who brought you Rick Santorum and Tom Ridge, a behind-the-scenes moc-u-mentary of American politics: Zolitics presents Moving Numbers. I like to call it Rick Brabender gone wild. Love the Frank Luntz in-jokes.

Moving Numbers Episode 2: "Whatever It Takes" from Zolitics on Vimeo.

Nov 19 2009, 1:46PM

Why the Democrats Are Sluggish on Judicial Nominations

Democratic senators are slow-waking President Obama's judicial nominations, something that our constitutional law professor chief executive is said to be frustrated about. The Washington Independent's chronicler of the conservative movement, David Weigel, has a theory: the White House itself is to blame because it's failed the zone with nominees and hasn't gone to the mat for all of them. Republicans, he notes, were quite aggressive in squeezing their nominees through a tighter Senate vise.

More

Nov 18 2009, 4:50PM

Will The House Play Hardball With State Secrets?

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are preparing for a confrontation with the White House over the state secrets privilege. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (R-NY), the chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, has called the privilege's expansion during the Bush administration "the greatest threat to liberty in this country."

At an academic conference in Washington today, Nadler noted that the Patriot Act reauthorization, which the White House supports, might come to the floor at the same time as House legislation on the state secrets privilege, about which the White House has been publicly silent -- and privately skeptical.

More

Nov 18 2009, 3:30PM

Setting The Stage For An Intense GOP Primary In New Hampshire

Sean Mahoney, a Republican national committeeman and publisher, said today that he won't enter the primary for retiring Sen. Judd Gregg's open seat. Mahoney's departure statement left open the possibility that he might endorse one of the two remaining Republicans -- Manchester lawyer Ovide LaMontagne or Attorney General Kelly Ayotte.  "As I considered this race, my number one priority was to make sure that there was a candidate in the race who supported my conservative principles," Mahoney said, according to the Union Leader. "After listening to the announced candidates at various forums and meetings I am confident that we'll have a true conservative leading the charge to keep the seat in Republican hands."  The Union Leader reports, however, that Mahoney will NOT endorse.  

More

Nov 18 2009, 10:38AM

It's Dumb To Blame Biden For Crashes

All number of misleading headlines and tweets today about an incident involving Vice President Joe Biden's motorcade in New York yesterday.

First, the facts. The car in question was a "route" car driven by a police officer. In large motorcades, "route" precedes the "command" car and "lead" car by about five minutes. (In Washington, D.C., officers call it the "Five Minute Car.")

Inside the route car were two police officers and two members of Vice President Biden's political advance team. There were no United States Secret Service agents involved. And a cab driver is said to have caused the crash.

Earlier this week, a woman drove her car into a police car that was providing intersection control for a Biden motorcade in Albuquerque, NM. A deputy was injured.

More

Nov 18 2009, 9:30AM

As Many As 75 Detainees Could Remain In Limbo

The Washington Post appears to have broken a significant news story without really knowing it. Here's Perry Bacon, writing about Congressional efforts to move Guantanamo prisoners:

Administration officials say they expect that as many as 40 of the 215 detainees at Guantanamo will be tried in federal court or military commissions. About 90 others have been cleared for repatriation or resettlement in a third country, and about 75 more have been deemed too dangerous to release but cannot be prosecuted because of evidentiary issues and limits on the use of classified material.

75 more... " too dangerous to release but cannot be prosecuted because of evidentiary issues and limits on the use of classified material."   No citation for this figure. 

An administration official said told me that is "too early" to know whether the number will be that high; it depends on whether they can get other countries to accept any more from this group.  But, the official said, it could be "that high."

More

Nov 18 2009, 8:54AM

All The President's News...In Five Bullet Points

We've summarized the president's round-robin interviews with network correspondents...so you don't have to!

1. Afghanistan: President Obama decried leaks, saying that if they came from his shop, they'd be fireable offenses. (BTW: did POTUS read this?) He said a decision on troops is still "weeks away," even though his ambassador to India, Tim Roemer, said that the Indian PM would be notified of the decision next week. Obama, to CNN: "I am very confident that when I announce the decision, the American people will have a lot of clarity about what we're doing, how we're going to succeed, how much this thing is going to cost." BTW: Check out Spencer Ackerman's brigade-by-brigade breakdown of how many troops the Army actually has available to fight...anywhere.

2. Obama acknowledged that Guatnanamo Bay would likely not be closed by the time of his January deadline. More Obama, to Fox: "People, I think understandably, are fearful after a lot of years where they were told that Guantanamo was critical to keep terrorists out."

3. Obama promised that he'd sign a health care bill by the State of the Union (1/28), not by the end of the year.

4.  Obama said he was worried about the possibility of a double-dip recession, telling Fox: "It is important though to recognize if we keep on adding to the debt, even in the midst of this recovery, that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession," he said.

5. On the decision to try KSM in federal court, said POTUS: "I have complete confidence in the American people and our legal traditions and the prosecutors. We've done this before."

Nov 18 2009, 8:14AM

The Real Intelligence Wars: Oversight And Access

For months, the CIA director, Leon Panetta, and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Adm. Dennis Blair (ret.), fought an intense and acrimonious turf battle over covert action oversight and access to White House officials. Last week, the two men agreed to a truce when they signed a classified memorandum brokered by the National Security Adviser, James Jones.

Through intermediaries, Panetta and Blair crossed swords over who should appoint senior intelligence representatives in foreign countries. Now, through interviews, new details are emerging about other, more sensitive conflicts between the two men and their agencies, including which agency is responsible for oversight of the CIA's controversial and classified Predator drone program.

More

Nov 17 2009, 6:43PM

E-mails Portray Palin Campaign Trail Chaos

In her new book, former Alaska Gov.. Sarah Palin describes the push-and-pull between John McCain's campaign headquarters and her plucky "B" team on the road. As Palin recounts it, her natural instincts to reach real voters and reach out to the press were frequently foiled by an overprotective senior staff, led by strategist Steve Schmidt, that did not trust her.  

Palin acknowledges "going rogue" at points - but usually to positive effect, such as the time she rewrote a speech to special needs children or her wondering out loud about "why I was prohibited from calling the other ticket out on more of its strange associations."

At one point, Palin criticizes the campaign for forcing her to spend too much time glad-handing donors and local elected officials. "Why couldn't we focus more attention on the everyday folks who attended our rallies," she asks.

More

Nov 17 2009, 5:55PM

Provocation Of The Day: Muslims And The Military: A Solution?

I've avoided writing about whether Nidal Hassan's massacre reflects a broader problem with Muslims in the military. At the extremes, this debate is cartoonish: Muslims are either a fifth column, or it is not at all appropriate to even ask whether the balance between cultural sensitivity and counterintelligence needs to be changed.   That argument is all the rage these days, and I confess that I have no independent or original thoughts on the matter, other than to bleat in exasperation when people blame the actions of an individual on a group of people (American Moslems) who don't exhibit said  behavior  99.9% of the time.

My colleague, Jeffrey Goldberg, has been blunt from the beginning, and nuanced. It is one thing not to blame Moslems for the sins of Hassan; it is quite another to ignore the role that Jihadist theology seems to have played in the twisted mental theater of Hassan's mind.  Goldberg  posits as a problem that there aren't enough Muslims in the U.S. military.  He also acknowledges that the potential for extremist beliefs, when held by members of the military, to cause harm (rather than simply hurt) is high. So his solution: recruit more Muslims AND screen them more tightly for extremist beliefs. Be sensitive and honest about it; certain ideologies are a problem and even when privately held, are not compatible with military service.  This discussion does not at all suggest that the case ought to be closed -- that the easiest way to understand what happened is to blame it on Islam -- and that the genesis of this act of terror can be sufficiently proven. And let's be honest: this is discrimination. Goldberg would argue, however, that discrimination in this case is rational.

Do you agree? Disagree? 

Nov 17 2009, 2:39PM

Sarah Palin On Evolution: In Her Own Words

Is Sarah Palin a creationist? An adherent to the theory of intelligent design? A conventional Christian? A Deist? Here is Palin, in her own words, writing on page 217 of her book.  My conclusion is that she's a creationist but doesn't want to be called a creationist because the word connotes, as she says, "wild-eyed fundamentalists burying evidence for any kind of evolution under an avalanche of Bible verses."

More

Nov 17 2009, 10:31AM

A Slow-Burning Departure For Gregory Craig

Why was Gregory Craig, the departing White House counsel, allowed to twist in the wind for so long? For a month, it's been an open secret in Washington that Craig was on his way out. Five weeks ago, a senior administration official, speaking to me on an off-the-record basis, offered a tip that Craig would resign around Thanksgiving and would be replaced by the president's personal lawyer, Robert Bauer. A number of journalists reported having similar conversations.

For a White House that prides itself on mitigating the effects of internal drama, the Craig resignation is a real failure. It's left many Craig allies -- inside and outside of government -- angry with the president's top advisers. They accuse these advisers, primarily the president's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, of orchestrating a public whispering campaign designed to force Craig to resign. Implicitly, the thinking goes, no one in the White House had the -- gumption -- to fire Craig to his face.

More

Nov 16 2009, 2:36PM

Where Palin Fits On The Creation - Evolution Scale

Much more so than abortion, the issue of life's origins wedges itself between the scientifically literate elite and everyone else. No surprise. This is the Big Question, and it has implications for politics: what is humanity? What do we owe each other? From where do we derive our ethics? How do we solve irreconcilable value claims? As evidence for evolution grows, the number of Americans who accept a literal creationist account of human origins has shrunk. Most of these beliefs have been channeled into the "intelligent design" movement, which shares virtually everything with creationism except the name and the implication that macroevolution didn't happen naturally on at least some level. So -- think of public opinion along a line. Very roughly, between 15 and 25%, believe that evolution is a natural process and either know -- or doubt -- that God directed it, and about 75% are willing to acknowledge God's role. Of that 75%, half accept at least some parts of evolutionary theory. The other half is made up of Biblical creationists.

Palin accepts creationism's critique, which is that there is no way that species share a common lineage, or that humans descended from apes, or that terrestrial creatures descended from aquatic creatures.

"But your dad's a science teacher," Schmidt objected. "Yes." "Then you know that science proves evolution," added Schmidt. "Parts of evolution," I said. "But I believe that God created us and also that He can create an evolutionary process that allows species to change and adapt." Schmidt winced and raised his eyebrows. In the dim light, his sunglasses shifted atop his head. I had just dared to mention the C-word: creationism. But I felt I was on solid factual ground.

More

Nov 16 2009, 12:43PM

Oh Sarah, We Hardly Had The Time To Rethink You

Can Sarah Palin make a political comeback? The question itself turns political prognosticators into Calvinists. Of course not. It's predestined. She's way too...unpopular? Well, she's not unpopular. She's way too...polarizing... (Who isn't?) A lot of these folks know she can't be president because they don't want her to be president. The truth is that no one knows when this conservative populist energy attenuates; we don't know who creates the structures to harness and exploit it. We don't know what happens if Mike Huckabee decides not to run -- we assume he will, but we don't know.

More

Nov 15 2009, 2:18PM

The Sunday Shows In Five Bullet Points Or Less

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in interviews on Meet and This Week, appeared to present the Karzai administration with some conditions for U.S. assistance, including the establishment of an anti-corruption commission and a major crimals tribunal, as well as a certification process for aid. She refused to address timetables, the Eikenberry cables, troop numbers or her own positions.

On the trials of 9/11 terrorists in New York City:

More

Nov 13 2009, 1:05PM

A Political Decision This Ain't

Here's what the Attorney General isn't doing. He's not following public opinion, which generally opposes conducting any sort of 9/11 terrorist trial in the United States. He's not following perceived political wisdom, in that the administration is not providing cover for Democrats who are afraid of Republican remonstrations on terrorism. He is not appeasing special interest groups, the bulk of whom -- the ACLU being an example -- oppose quite vociferously the prospect of any new military commissions.

If this is politics, it's really dumb politics. And that's why it's probably not politics. Occam's razor applies. Obama and Holder are sincerely -- perhaps naively, but that's something we won't know for a while -- attempting to change the way the American people and the world think about counterterrorism. They want to change the narrative from a "strength/weakness" metaphor to an "example/rule of law" metaphor. This sounds a little PoMo, but it's the mark of a president who, on this issue in particular, does not believe that the old ways of thinking make America any safer. Certainly, they don't contribute to a national security politics of consensus.

More

Nov 13 2009, 12:54PM

Ad Of The Week: His Stick Is Bigger Than Yours

Courtesy of Jon Ralston, it's an ad for Sen. Harry Reid's re-election campaign in Nevada. It's not subtle. The tag line is: "America's most powerful Senator.  Harry Reid"


Nov 13 2009, 12:51PM

Offensive Cyber War Turned The Insuregency In 2007

Now it can be fully revealed: In May of 2007, the National Security Agency launched a massive cyber offensive against insurgent cell and computer networks in Iraq, which officials believe was responsible for breaking the back of the insurgency.  Shane Harris at National Journal takes you inside the Oval Office as the decision was made.

Former officials with knowledge of the computer network attack, all of whom requested anonymity when discussing intelligence techniques, said that the operation helped turn the tide of the war. Even more than the thousands of additional ground troops that Bush ordered to Iraq as part of the 2007 "surge," they credit the cyberattacks with allowing military planners to track and kill some of the most influential insurgents. The cyber-intelligence augmented information coming in from unmanned aerial drones as well as an expanding network of human spies. A Pentagon spokesman declined to discuss the operation.

When Bob Woodward wrote about unspecified techniques used to turn the tide of the war, this is what he meant.

Nov 12 2009, 10:52PM

White House Counsel: Craig Out, Bauer In

Sources in government say that White House Counsel Gregory Craig has decided to resign, and that the president's personal lawyer, Robert Bauer, will take his place.  A formal announcement is slated for next week, though word might drop Friday. The official changeover won't happen until next year.

The move has been in the works for more than a month, the decision to move on was mutual, and the announcement was delayed while the White House waited out a spate of negative press stories about Craig.  

Craig is highly regarded by his colleagues for having a top-flight legal and tactical mind. And he is a veteran of the White House, having served as chief counsel to President Clinton during impeachment. He spent decades in private practice, had five years experience as chief national security counsel to Ted Kennedy and served on Madeleine Albright's policy planning staff at the State Department.

More

Nov 12 2009, 6:26PM

Sarah Palin And The Case Of The $500,000 Legal Bill

The Associated Press obtained a copy of Sarah Palin's new book, and came away with several scooplets, including the following:

"... [S]he says that most of her legal bills were generated defending what she called frivolous ethics complaints, but she reveals that about one-tenth of the $500,000 was a bill she received to pay for the McCain campaign vetting her for the VP nod.

She said when she asked the McCain campaign if it would help her financially, she was told McCain's camp would have paid all the bills if he'd won; since he lost, the vetting legal bills were her responsibility."

Without having read the book, and without knowing precisely what the AP is summarizing, it's hard to know what this charge entails. (Note: the AP originally reported that Palin was given a bill for $500,000.)

More

Nov 12 2009, 5:00PM

With Whom Is Obama Most Unpopular?

From the crosstabs of a new poll by Pew, here's a look at the Anti-Obama Coalition, followed by the percentages of people within a certain cleavage who approve of the job he is doing as president.

With independents over the age of 50 -- just 37%.
Among whites in the South -- 33%
Among white independents -- 39%
Among white evangelicals -- 28%
Among married men -- 42%
Among everyone over 65 -- 44%
Among those earning more than $75,000 -- 44%

More

Nov 12 2009, 4:18PM

Is Tim Pawlenty Romney-esque?

Even Mitt Romney doesn't like to be called "Romneyesque" these days. The word has a legacy albatross from the 2008 Republican primary, when Romney, a can-do pragmatic governor of a relatively liberal state, swerved to the right to prove himself acceptable to conservative primary voters. "Romneyesque," as an epithet, conveys a willingness to abandon one's core convictions -- in Romney's case, temperance and modesty on social issues -- in order to pander. It was always kind of unfair in that Romney didn't shift his positions much, just his tone. But the label stuck.

More

Nov 12 2009, 12:09PM

Did Hoekstra Compromise A Sensitive Intelligence Program?

Rep. Peter Hoekstra, a vocal critic of the government's investigation into Ft. Hood shooting suspect Nidal Malik Hasan, may have compromised a sensitive National Security Agency collection program when he confirmed to the Washington Post that Hasan had been in e-mail contact with a Anwar al-Awlaki, a radical cleric who moved from Virginia to Yemen after the September 11th attacks, senior intelligence officials said.

Hoekstra, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, contends that information about a U.S. army officer's contact with a cleric considered by the intelligence community to be an Al Qaeda sympathizer should have raised significant concerns -- but apparently did not. The Post article cited a "law enforcement official" as the originator of the tip about the e-mails, but then quotes Hoekstra, who has access to some of the government's most secret intelligence, that "the very fact that he's sent e-mail . . . to this guy and got responses would be quite a concern to me."

More

Nov 12 2009, 10:51AM

Top National Security Lawyers Blast Classified Leaks

The Obama administration's top national security lawyers said today that recent leaks of classified information have already compromised intelligence sources and methods, and that the Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, had appointed his top counter-intelligence executive, Robert M. "Bear" Bryant, to come up with better ways of tamping them down.

More

Nov 12 2009, 6:59AM

Down Goes Ohio, Down Goes Ohio

Well-conducted Ohio polls are catnip for political analysts. So here goes: a new Quinnipiac poll of the state gives President Obama his lowest job approval rating there since the beginning of his presidency, with only 45% of voters saying he's doing a good job.  At the same time, the Republican candidate for retiring Sen. George Voinovich's seat, ex-Bush administration official/ex-Rep. Rob Portman, has small leads over both his potential Democratic opponents.  The economy and the health care debate seem to be driving Ohio's voters back into the purple -- if not the red. 57% disapprove of the way Obama has handled health care reform. Self-identified independents disapprove of Obama's health care handling by nearly two-to-one.

Nov 10 2009, 5:36PM

Anita Dunn's White House Legacy

Inside the West Wing, Anita Dunn is known as the "Fairy Godmother." In keeping with the literary allusion, Dunn takes special care to make sure that even the junior-most assistant to the deputy assistant feel as if they are an integral part of the Obama administration.

At Dunn's insistence, a weekly communication strategy session was opened to any White House staffer who wanted to attend, a feat of internal transparency that, even in the Obama administration's open-sourced culture, is rare.

Dunn was recruited to be the communications director in April. When the president formally asked her to take the job, Dunn agreed, on the condition that she leave by the end of the year. Her son, Stephen, is 13 and needs his parents. The president is reported to have joked that he might not let her go.

More

Nov 10 2009, 3:07PM

The Best Speech Obama's Given Since...Maybe Ever

Today, at Ft. Hood. I guarantee: they'll be teaching this one in rhetoric classes. It was that good. My gloss won't do it justice. Yes, I'm having a Chris Matthews-chill-running-up-my-leg moment, but sometimes, the man, the moment and the words come together and meet the challenge. Obama had to lead a nation's grieving; he had to try and address the thorny issues of Islam and terrorism; to be firm; to express the spirit of America, using familiar, comforting tropes in a way that didn't sound trite.   An excerpt from the elegiac address, below, and the full text, after the jump.

It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this tragedy.  But this much we do know - no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor. And for what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice - in this world, and the next.
These are trying times for our country. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the same extremists who killed nearly 3,000 Americans continue to endanger America, our allies, and innocent Afghans and Pakistanis. In Iraq, we are working to bring a war to a successful end, as there are still those who would deny the Iraqi people the future that Americans and Iraqis have sacrificed so much for.

As we face these challenges, the stories of those at Fort Hood reaffirm the core values that we are fighting for, and the strength that we must draw upon. Theirs are tales of American men and women answering an extraordinary call - the call to serve their comrades, their communities, and their country. In an age of selfishness, they embody responsibility. In an era of division, they call upon us to come together. In a time of cynicism, they remind us of who we are as Americans.

We are a nation that endures because of the courage of those who defend it. We saw that valor in those who braved bullets here at Fort Hood, just as surely as we see it in those who signed up knowing that they would serve in harm's way.

We are a nation of laws whose commitment to justice is so enduring that we would treat a gunman and give him due process, just as surely as we will see that he pays for his crimes

We are a nation that guarantees the freedom to worship as one chooses. And instead of claiming God for our side, we remember Lincoln's words, and always pray to be on the side of God.


More

Nov 10 2009, 1:15PM

Really, Mark Warner. REALLY?

Not to deliberately steal from the talented folks who write Update at SNL, but, really? Sen. Mark Warner said President Obama misplayed the health care debate because he didn't focus on cost containment. Really?

Well, yes, he really said that.

"I wish the president would have started the debate by explaining to the American people that our current health care system is not financially sustainable, for even another decade," Warner told the Washington Times. "Driving down health care costs should have been the focus of the debate."

This is unreality. The FIRST argument that the White House turned to about health care was about the cost of doing nothing. (It was Tom Daschle's formulation, actually, that Obama adopted during the campaign and the transition and the early part of this year.)

More

Nov 10 2009, 1:14PM

Justice Department's GTMO Decision: What To Expect

Ahead of a November 16  deadline, the Justice Department is readying a decision on how to bring some of Guantanamo's most infamous detainees to trial.

Officials insist that as of last night, when senior officials most recently met, Attorney General Eric Holder hadn't decided which detainees to try and where to put them on trial: either in federal courts or by the new military commission process that Congress ratified last month. Nonetheless, some clues about Justice's thinking are emerging.

ITEM: Early reports that as many as two dozen detainees would be disposed of during this first flight of announcements are false. Officials expect the announcement to focus on fewer than 20 -- perhaps as few as a dozen.

More

Nov 10 2009, 11:34AM

A Thumbnail Guide To Some Top Republican Targets In 2010

The motion of the ocean aside, here's a quick guide to some Democratic House members that Republicans believe are genuinely vulnerable in a year when President Obama isn't on the ballot. (Note: isn't it interesting how this formulation admits that, were Obama to be on the ballot, some of these folks wouldn't be as vulnerable?) Even though the NRCC hasn't recruited challengers in all of these districts, they've begun to target the incumbents in radio ads and through auto-dial calls in an effort to both test how vulnerable these Democrats are and begin to soften them up if they aren't. There are potentially vulnerable Dems not on this list, but I'm sticking to the races where the GOP has spent the most money (on TV, on polling, on recruitment) so far.

Suzanne Kosmas (FL-24) -- Voted no on health care (she was leaning towards voting "yes"), yes for the stimulus package, voted yes on cap-and-trade (though it shouldn't matter much in her district, which spans suburban Orlando and Brevard County).  She has two declared GOP challengers so far, but has managed to outraise both of them.  Her perch on the House Financial Services Committee helps her bring $$ to the district.

Alan Grayson (FL-08) -- He represents Orlando, and he's a target because of his outspokesness on health care and other issues. He's also independently wealthy, and has so far scared away Republican challengers. His Netroots popularity means a steady source of support and money should he scare one in to the race.

More

Nov 9 2009, 3:16PM

The War Within: Democrats And The Stupak Language

The flashiest health care controversy this weekend involved what's now known as the "Stupak" language, which was added to the House health care bill ostensibly to prevent pro-life Democrats from abandoning ship. The House leadership gulped it down as if it were a barium swallow. The amendment restricts private insurers participating in the exchange from offering abortion coverage as part of their policies. They can still offer add-on abortion-only coverage, but the subsidies that the health care bill provides couldn't be tapped.

More

Nov 9 2009, 3:15PM

The War Within: Conservative Pushed Out In Colorado

An interesting development in the Republican gubernatorial primary in Colorado: a big battle that was shaping up between a young conservative upstart, State Sen. Minority Leader Josh Penry, and ex-Rep. Scott McInnis is over before it began. The conservative, Penry, has left the race and plans to endorse McInnis, according to a top GOP strategist. This is kind of a "stunner," as Chris Cillizza notes, because the incumbent governor, Bill Ritter, is in electoral peril, and Penry is an archetype of a credible, electable conservative -- just the type of person you'd think the GOP would want to support -- or would want to NOT oppose at the risk of angering conservative activists.

More

Nov 9 2009, 2:21PM

White House Still Interviewing For Cyber Coordinator Position

A month ago, it seemed like the White House was on the verge of announcing the president's choice to be cyber security coordinator for the government. It was, after all, National Cyber Security Awareness Month, and the Pentagon's Cyber Command officially stood at attention. No dice. National Security Council principals continue to interview candidates for the position, several people with knowledge said. As a sign that the process remains open, several potential candidates had met with very senior officials, like the chairman of the National Economic Council, Lawrence Summers.

More

Nov 9 2009, 2:13PM

The Atlantic's Boldest: Department Of Corrections

Relying on inaccurate voting lists, I misstated the votes of several Democrats on several key pieces of legislation. Rep. Collin Peterson voted FOR the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill, as did Rep. Heath Shuler and Rep. Frank Kratovil.   Here's the official clerk's report for H.R. 2454, H.R. 887 (health care) and the stimulus package (H.R.1).


Nov 9 2009, 12:32PM

The 4 Dems Who Voted Against Stimulus, Cap-N-Trade And Health Care

Note: lesson learned: always go by official roll call votes. What was once eight is now four.

Call them the HVT-4.  Four Democratic members of Congress have voted against the economic stimulus package, the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill and the Democratic health care reform legislation.  They're the low-hanging fruit - or highest value targets - for the National Republican Congressional Committee right now. Some will be harder to dislodge than others. Note that 11 House Dems voted against the House version of the stimulus package; five later voted for the final, conferenced bill. That confused me earlier, so there are several Dems whose names I deleted from this list.

More

Nov 8 2009, 12:00PM

The Sunday Shows: Health Care And Afghanistan

First, some bonuses:  = the 39 Democrats who voted against the House bill --  John Adler (NJ) Jason Altmire (PA)  Brian Baird  (WA) John Barrow (GA) John Boccieri (OH)  Dan Boren  (OK) Rick Boucher (TX)  Allen Boyd (FL) Bobby Bright (AL) Ben Chandler (KY) Travis Childers, Artur Davis (AL)**, Lincoln Davis (TN) Chet Edwards (TX) Bart Gordon (TN) Parker Griffith (AL),  Herseth Sandlin (SD) Tim Holden (PA) Larry Kissell (NC) Suzanne Kosmas (FL) Frank Kratovil (MD) Dennis Kucinich (OH)  Betsey Markey (CO) Jim Marshall (GA) Eric Massa (NY) Jim Matheson (UT)  Mike McIntyre (PA) Michael McMahon,. Charlie  Melancon (LA)**  Walt Minnick (ID)  Scott Murphy (NY) Glenn Nye (VA) Collin Peterson (MN) Aaron Ross (AR), Health Shuler (NC) Ike Skelton (MO) John Tanner, Gene Taylor (AR) Harry Teague (NM). 

31 of these Democrats represent districts won by John McCain.  The rest are bolded. 8 of the 39 won by fewer than 10 points. 14 voted in districts where the Obama-McCain or McCain-Obama margin was less than 5 %. 14 of the 39 were freshman. 23 also voted against the cap and trade bill. These are target Alpha for Republicans. (A. Davis and C. Melancon are running for higher office -- Davis for governor and Melancon for Senate.)  In 2 districts (ID-1) and (AL-2) the McCain-Palin ticket won by 25 points or more.

Bonus 2:  minute-by-minute coverage of Gov. Tim Pawlenty's speech to Iowa Republicans last night from O. Kay Henderson. Key lines: "Hope and change have brought Americans fear.
  "I want to ask you: 'Are you fired up and ready to fight back?  The only thing growing faster than the national debt is Chris Matthews' man-crush on Barack Obama."  "We don't have a big enough party to be throwing people overboard,"

More

Nov 6 2009, 3:03PM

Longtime Obama Friend Leaving White House

The White House announced today that Cassandra Q. Butts, a long-time friend of the president's who serves as his chief deputy in the White House Counsel's Office, will be leaving her post to become senior adviser to the Millennium Challenge Corporation.

The agency was chartered by Congress in 2004 to partner with third-world countries and promote sustainable growth and good government.

More

Nov 6 2009, 2:31PM

The Deficit Choice: What The White House Is Thinking

Huge deficits will be omnipresent throughout President Obama's first term, complicating his administration's messaging efforts on the economy. But advisers separate the political repercussions from the actual underlying fiscal and monetary policies.  In some ways, the short-term politics of the deficit are negligible. They're preferable to the short-term politics of a much higher unemployment rate with no economic growth -- and a smaller deficit.

More

Nov 6 2009, 11:21AM

Paterson's Defiant Ad Buy In New York

New York Governor David Paterson (D), emboldened by the results of Tuesday's elections, begins his first flight of television ads today in the state. The ads, entitled "Some Say," refer to attempts by the White House to persuade Paterson, whose approval ratings are low, to not run for his first elected term. According to a Republican media ad buyer, the Paterson campaign is spending about $625,785 for a week's worth of ads in five markets, including Rochester, Buffalo and New York City. The New York Times has more info here.

Nov 6 2009, 10:23AM

The White House Political Learning Curve

Is Barack Obama's cool style of governing fundamentally incompatible with the furnace of modern politics? Bipartisan conclaves, bringing industry to the table(s), relative transparency, accommodation and consensus meetings are all ornaments of the Obama brand. But political parties, built around existing alignments of interests, tend to get excited about fighting. Base-tending is crucial to political husbandry. Obama has a gourmand's disdain for populism and picking fights.

More

Nov 5 2009, 5:26PM

The Cornyn Caveat: What The NRSC Will Do -- And Won't Do -- In Primaries

One day after National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman John Cornyn promised that his group wouldn't play spend money in the Republican primaries, a Republican Senate candidate in Arkansas has gotten some attention for an upcoming fundraiser of his at the National Republican Senatorial Committee headquarters in Washington. Candidate Gilbert Baker has six Republican primary opponents, including the head of the Arkansas Tea Party movement. 

The AP says that Cornyn is listed as a host of the 11/19 fundraiser, along with three other GOP heavyweights, including the top Senate Republican, Mitch McConnell.

An NRSC spokesperson told the AP that the fundraiser does not imply that Cornyn is endorsing Mr.Baker. Other candidates, the spokesperson said, could also have their fundraisers at the NRSC.

More

Nov 5 2009, 5:11PM

Interview: The Club For Growth Ascendent

Here's a Q and A with ex-Rep. Chris Chocola, president of the Club for Growth, whose endorsement of Doug Hoffman in New York's 23rd congressional district precipitated Hoffman's quick rise to national prominence. Though the Club lost this race, they scored a coup the next day when Sen. John Cornyn, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said that he would not spend money on behalf of candidates who faced primaries, even those candidates he personally recruited.

What's your 30,000 feet take on Tuesday night?


For conservatives, really, they did not lose anything on Tuesday night because even in Hoffman's loss, if the Club for Growth had done nothing, Hoffman wouldn't have been able to mount a viable campaign. You would had the same type of policymaker in Scozzafava or Owens. Certainly we would have rather had Hoffman win. A victory in itself [when] a guy like John Cornyn [says it's]  his lesson that the competitive primaries are a good thing. It's not good that party bosses tell the voters who they ought to like. So that's a victory in and of itself.

What's the Club for Growth's brand like out there? I ask that because it seems like a lot of folks in the district didn't like how Hoffman became a talisman for a movement that originated outside the district.

Everyone would say that the [Scozzafava] probably wasn't in hindsight the most attractive candidate for the Republicans. If the county chairman had picked a principled conservative from the beginning, they would have probably won rather easily. So, there was a lot of money coming from all sides, and we don't take solace in this, but she ended up being everything that we said she was. I don't buy the argument that this was a struggle within the conservatives. There was no moderate in the race. There may be examples of that in the future, like in Florida.

More

Nov 5 2009, 3:12PM

Respinning Virginia: Forget The Obama Surge Voters

Heaven help me, but I'm going to take issue with a political satirist. And not just any political satirist, mind you, but Jon Stewart himself. On his Monday show, Stewart lampooned the tendency of journo-punditocrats to opine that the interpretation of the election matters as much as the election itself. The humor was based on the premise that both sides will have their spin, pundits will dutifully select whatever spin fits the moment, and then, even though they know they're not telling the truth, will focus the collective mind in such a way as to perpetuate a distorted meaning of the election.

More

Nov 4 2009, 4:15PM

The Great Political Sort Continues

New York's  House delegation is now 27-2 Democratic, or 93%.  (If you add in the senators it goes up to 94%.)  For comparison, Texas's House delegation is 63% Republican, Florida's is 60% Republican, and California's (counting Garamendi) is 64% Democratic.
 
In recent memory, has such a large state been so totally dominated by a single party? The largest I can think of are Massachusetts today (100% Dem) and Oklahoma in the late '90s (100% GOP).

While we're at it: Why has the GOP collapsed in rural upstate New York but not in rural central Pennsylvania?  I know there are cultural differences between the two (Yankee vs. Scots-Irish) but it's a striking divide nonetheless.

Nov 4 2009, 3:40PM

NY 23, Palin 0, Erick Erickson 1

The CW take, courtesy of SNL's Seth Meyers, is that Sarah Palin's brand problems contributed to the defeat of the candidate she backed in the very special election in New York's 23rd Congressional District. But Republican candidates know who butters their bread. There are signs today that, far from taking Hoffman's defeat as evidence that voters are anxious about attempts to run a hard right candidacy, the GOP mod squad is interpreting Hoffman's surge as a warning.

ITEM: The National Republican Senatorial Committee says it won't spend money in Republican primaries even though it recruited several candidates who now face them. The idea isn't to cede control over candidate recruitment so much as it is to back away from the impression that they're in the business of anointing candidates.

ITEM: Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) endorses conservative California Senate candidate Chuck DeVore on the day that the NRSC-recruited candidate, Carly Fiorna, enters the race. (The NRSC says it's not endorsing.)

More

Nov 4 2009, 3:17PM

Sarah From Alaska: The Truth And 2012

An interview with Shushannah Walshe and Scott Conroy, the authors of some behind-the-scenes reportage about Sarah Palin's vice presidential candidacy, "Sarah from Alaska."

You try hard to be fair in the book, but you chronicle, fairly persuasively, a large number of what seem to be fairly egregious distortions by the candidate. Why does she do this? Why doesn't she, as you wrote, acknowledge uncomfortable truths?

Palin almost always seems outwardly poised and confident in front of a microphone, but she also demonstrates time and again--often in more subtle ways--signs of profound insecurity. It takes a self-confident person to admit mistakes and acknowledge one's own shortcomings, but Sarah Palin is quick to cast aside people who cross her in even minor ways, and her unwillingness to tolerate much dissent often leads to an infallibility syndrome.

More

Nov 4 2009, 10:05AM

Semiotics Of Marco Rubio's New Website

Marco Rubio's new $$ site:  semioticians, have a go:  http://www.charlieandobama.com/   

kiss.png
Looks like two guys about kiss, don't it?  Kinda a sensitive issue in Florida, where Gov. Crist was dogged by gay rumors... and where he embraced Barack Obama's stimulus package.  This is an interesting way to link Crist to Obama....maybe especially in light of the way New York's 23rd CD will be interpreted...not as a rejection of bipartisanship but as an acceptance of it.  Anyway, lots going on here.

Nov 4 2009, 8:06AM

11 Ways To Think About Tuesday Night

1. The White House has trouble melding its approach to governing, and standards of transparency and brand of being above politics, with a strong-arming White House political operation willing and capable of leading the Democratic party to victory.

2. Barack Obama's political coalition is not invincible and it is not perpetual. The Obama election didn't changed the fundamental political dynamics of off-year elections.

3. The White House's time horizons are longer than and different than the time horizons of House, Senate and gubernatorial candidates. It was more important for, say, Creigh Deeds, to get a health care bill passed by August than it was for President Obama. Obama's building a strong re-election coalition in 2012, but it's going to be frustrating for Democrats in the short term. Obama's approval rating in New Jersey was 57%.

4. The traditional, nonthreatening Republican economic message -- lower taxes, less spending, more disciplined government -- resonates better with independents than the Democratic message -- we need to spend our way out of the recession.

5. Deep recessions are deadly for governors, who must balance their budgets by cutting spending deeply or raising taxes.

6. It's very hard for Democrats to simultaneously turn out the Obama Coalition (younger, more liberal, more minority voters) and suburban independents (particularly older, particularly men).

More

Nov 3 2009, 9:06PM

The Equation In New Jersey: Why It's Close

A Sitting Governor's Approval Rating at less than 40%
PLUS
A perennially disgruntled populace
PLUS
One of the highest taxed states in the country
PLUS
A reconfigured off-off-year electorate
PLUS
Disaffected Democrats
PLUS
A crusading, anti-corruption, independent Republican who, it turns out, made some questionable decisions of his own
PLUS
Attention paid to the challenge's obesity
PLUS
A last minute draping of the presidential coattails
=
.....

Nov 3 2009, 8:03PM

New Jersey Exit Poll Results

Courtesy of CBS News: If Jon Corzine wins re-election, he can thank women, who gave him a narrow advantage and who voted at higher proportions than men did. Note the split among moderates and independents; independents, self-described, clearly were more conservative than moderates, which says something about the electorate, rather than, I think, the environment. nj1.png

Nov 3 2009, 7:32PM

The Virginia Exit Polls

virginia1.JPGAs everyone's noting, the percentage of young voters dropped off substantially from 2008. What should be noted: young voter turnout is never high in off-off year elections. That's not where Creigh Deeds's problems originated from. Look at his standing among independents. True, independents tend to lean toward the out-party in these elections, but Deeds had a foothold with them before the summer.  Then the summer happened. The summer: GM bailed out. Unemployment spikes. Talk in Washington of a trillion dollar health care bill. Suddenly, independent men, in particular, began to orient themselves toward the basic Republican message: lower taxes, less government intervention, less spending.   Waiting to see the geographic cross-tabs, but I'm betting that, where there's a comparison to be made, you'll find that Deeds did much worse among suburban (Richmond and DC) independents, particularly men, particularly those over 45.

Nov 3 2009, 6:00PM

Exits: Economy, Not Obama, Top Issues

The first round of exit polls come to us courtesy of my friends at CBS News. Please be sure to visit their website first!   First things first: even in a year when the composition of the electorate is dramatically different than the 2008 presidential election, President Obama's approval rating in Virginia is 51% among voters surveyed.  In New Jersey, it's 57%.  Fewer than half of voters for Bob McDonnell, the Republican gubernatorial candidate in VA, say they voted to send a message to Obama. About 38% of voters for Chris Christie, the New Jersey GOPer, tried to send a message, too. 38% of  CreighDeeds voters said their vote for the Democrat was to support Obama.

The big issues: the economy, to 46% of voters in Virginia. In New Jersey, it was the economy -- 31% , followed by property taxes (25%).  25% of voters in Virginia said health care was their top issue compared to 18% who said the same in New Jersey.

Nov 3 2009, 5:50PM

The DNC Pre-Spins...

From a Democratic National Committee e-mail, about the relevance of tonight's results:

NRCC Talking Point: "The 2001 Off-Year Elections Have No Bearing On Next Year's Mid-Term Elections. These Races Revolved Around Local Issues And Local Candidates. There Were No Discernable National Trends." NRCC Talking Points: "The 2001 off-year elections have no bearing on next year's mid-term elections. These races revolved around local issues and local candidates. There were no discernable national trends." [Hotline, 11/7/01]



More

Nov 3 2009, 2:21PM

The Election Line: 2:00 pm ET Update

An anecdotal canvassing from sources and reports across the nation.

Yes, btw, there ARE exit polls. No, I don't have access to them yet.

Democrats in Virginia say that GOP base precinct turnout is lower than what they'd expect for a race that's not supposed to be close. GOPers need to run 10-11 points ahead in base precincts in the aggregate, as of this AM they were about even. Some anecdotes about lower-than-expected GOP turnout in Richmond too. Note, though, that there's always a drop-off from about 10am to 4:30 pm, and that turnout is still in the range of a solid GOP victory across the tickets.

Turnout in Maine is high. In Bangor, it's over 50%, and that bodes poorly for ME 1, which would overturn the state's new same-sex marriage law.  High turnout seems to favor gay marriage; low turnout seems oppose it.

The folks at Public Policy Polling: "Many people who approve of Obama not voting for Owens, Corzine- that's the candidates' fault, not his."

Republicans are excited about what they're seeing in Virginia and not very excited about seeing about New Jersey.

The weather is great in the 23rd district in New York

Nov 3 2009, 1:56PM

Think Again: Breaking Through The Election Spin

"The 2009 races don't mean much for 2010."

Wrong. They set perceptions among candidates, strategists, and the media. They'll determine whether Democrats believe they'll be punished or rewarded for favoring an Obama-identified health care plan. They'll set the tone of (particularly) GOP primaries in House districts in early 2010. They'll contribute to the environment that 2010 candidates find themselves in. We won't know everything, but we'll get a sense of the depth of anti-establishment sentiment, the ability of conservatives to turnout voters in critical races, the skittishness of Democrats, and the way the parties in power respond to the developments. The 2009 races won't tell us whether Republicans will take back the House and Senate in 2010 -- still unlikely, in my opinion -- but they'll help Republicans and Democrats figure out how to run.

"The 2009 races are not a referendum on Obama."

That's what everyone's saying. And it's false. Each election hinges on something different, but where there's a common thread to most of the races, it's out-party, conservative enthusiasm, which is inversely correlated to how well Obama is perceived to be leading the country.

"The 2009 races are mostly a referendum on Obama."

Not true. Virginia rejected a Republican attorney general a few months after September 11, 2001; no one suggested that George W. Bush was to blame. Jon Corzine is much less popular in New Jersey than Obama. He's been the guy on watch as New Jersey's economy tanked. These races are mostly a referendum on the ability of conservatives to turn out their base voters in off-year elections at a time when Democrats are nervous and the economy is in tatters. Nothing concentrates the mind of the opposition like economic discontent, and that force usually benefits the party out of power.

More

Nov 3 2009, 11:56AM

The Most Popular 2009 Election Video Is Phat

Or, "Fat," as in calling attention to the obesity of one's opponent. That's right -- according to the folks at Google, the ad named "if" by Jon Corzine's gubernatorial campaign was downloaded 100,000 more times than its nearest competitor.  Who's responsible for calling attention to the ad? The media, which picked up on charges, later confirmed, that Corzine's jibe at Chris Christie -- the Republican "threw his weight around" -- was deliberately designed to make fun of Christie's girth and draw out associated stereotypes.

Nov 2 2009, 1:30PM

So Many Assumptions, So Little Time

The Democrats assume that independents won't find the GOP an attractive vehicle for their disaffection, while Republicans assume that independents will unite against the Democratic Party's agenda in Congress: health care reform, cap-and-trade, the stimulus package, liberal social policy legislation.  That means that Republicans will spend 2010 attacking the Democratic Congress, while Democrats will spend 2010 attacking the Republican brand -- reminding independents why they disassociated with the party in the first place.  

A political assumption among Democrats is that health care reform will be popular in the short run -- and when the implementation phase begins, it may be unpopular again -- but it will, in the long-term, be a bragging point for the party.

A political assumption among Republicans is that Democrats will get no credit for health care reform.

A patronizing assumption among Democrats is that Republican Party leaders will fail to find attractive, moderate candidates and run them in appropriate districts in 2010.

A patronizing assumption among Republicans is that Nancy Pelosi isn't smart enough to figure out how to give centrist Democrats leeway to buck the party in 2010.

A corollary assumption for Democrats is that Republicans cannot build a national movement.

A corollary assumption for Republicans is that Democrats consistently underestimate the long-term brand failure of liberalism.  

An unspoken assumption among Democrats is that the economy has put people into a funk. The quicker the economy improves, the more attenuated the incipient populism will be. (You'll never hear Democrats say this, shades of Jimmy Carter's "malaise" speech, a word, of course, he never actually uttered.)

An unspoken assumption among Republicans is that cultural politics, dampened by the failure of the Bush presidency and the collapse of the economy last year, are back and tilting the electorate decidedly. Broadly defined, this includes fears about multiculturalism, political correctness, gay rights, and immigration.  

Nov 2 2009, 12:26PM

Why Are Democrats Afraid Of The Debt?

A colloquy on debt politics follows. Earlier today, I wrote this:

Faced with the prospect of a obliquely angeled "V" shaped recession, the president's policy planners have been trying to figure out how to create jobs in an economy that is newly conditioned to be lean. Trouble is, of course, that the range of policy options favored by Democrats -- more spending, more government transfers -- are at odds with the second fundamental reality of the economy: the deficit and mounting debt. 

A good question: What in the hell do I mean?  The only reason why deficits and debt are realities is because political pundits like me say they're realities. The real realty -- what's actually producing the anxiety that's being yoked to the debt and deficit -- is the inability or unwillingness of the government to spend what it needs to spend in order to resuscitate demand.  Truth is that compared to the other economic problems we face, debt isn't much of a problem. But -- and this was the point I was trying to make -- it's become a problem because political elites have willed it to be a problem (and Americans seem to agree.)

More

Nov 2 2009, 12:07PM

CW Gets It Right: Governor's Races Will Be Supremo In 2010

The conventional wisdom about 2010 can be summarized as follows; Republicans will pick up some seats in the House, maybe a few in the Senate, and Democrats will retain control. More and more, though, that CW is turning to the governor's races as the most consequential. I think the CW is right. Nearly 80 percent of Americans will choose their state leaders on the eve of the first and only congressional redistricting of the Obama era. Democrats have the chance to consolidate gains at the state legislature level, and Republicans have the chance to prevent the Democrats from exploiting the national/natural demographic drift toward the Democrats. Including New Jersey and Virginia, Democrats will be trying to hold onto 22 seats; Republicans will try to keep 16 seats.

More

Nov 2 2009, 10:52AM

An Ironic Echo For the RNC

In a new radio ad, the Republican National Committee tells voters in New York's 23rd Congressional District that their choice Tuesday will "echo" from Albany to Washington. It's an effective message, but it's also ironic, coming from the same party vessel that endorsed the candidate who dropped out -- and from the party that spent $1 million on said dropped-out candidate. Apparently, the message has already echoed in Michael Steele's office...  Note: the National Republican Congressional Committee spent the $1 million and not the RNC headquarters organization itself.

Nov 2 2009, 10:17AM

Rubio Prepares To Be King....

It's good to be Marco Rubio these days. The South Florida conservative has been all-but-anointed the heir to the grassroots energy that's collected around Doug Hoffman's candidacy in New York's 23rd Congressional District. Today, Rubio's campaign plans to launch what it considers the "most powerful online fundraising site" in Florida history. That's saying something, because Florida's a typically beneficent state for Republican donors. The campaign wouldn't provide details, but it did explicitly link the creation of the site with Hoffman's expected victory. It's also helpful, most assuredly, that newspapers have taken to publicizing opponent Gov. Charlie Crist's precipitous drop in the polls. Mr. Rubio knows where his bread is buttered.

Nov 2 2009, 10:13AM

The White House: Let Conservatives Win... (For Now)

The White House is playing it cool. Faced with the prospect of losing governor's mansions in Virginia and New Jersey, a would-be pick-up seat in New York, maybe a few liberal policy referendums and the mayoralty of Atlanta,  Obama administration political and policy planners will put on their Snuggies Tuesday night and watch FlashFoward.  It's the future they're concerned about, not the present.

More

Oct 31 2009, 11:09PM

Even More Lessons From New York 23

Analogizing races in politics is like eating pizza slices. Someone has too many; others are left hungry for at least one more slice.

The analog of NY-23 that comes to mind is the Florida GOP Senate primary, and this shows the promise and the limits of analogies. Like NY-23, conservatives have been protesting the GOP establishment's decision to rally around not-so-conservative but ostensibly popular Gov. Charlie Crist at the expense of challenger Marco Rubio. Rubio, like Hoffman, has been winning grassroots straw polls. Rubio, like Hoffman, has run as a populist conservative. Crist has some inherent vulnerabilities that, thanks to Rubio and to an aggressive Florida press corps, are beginning to be exploited. Similarities end, though: Rubio is a professional politician. He's crisper on the hustings. He knows the issues of the state. He's a plausible governor, having been mentored by Jeb Bush, Crist's predecessor. There are no third-party dynamics here, just a bunch of conservative activists who don't want Charlie Crist to be their senator. Late word from Florida tonight: Crist's popularity has dropped. The tag of "Empty Chair Charlie" -- referring to what pollster Tom Eldon calls his "uneventful" three years in office as well as, flirtatiously, to Crist's reputed intellectual fogginess.

More

Oct 31 2009, 11:39AM

Dede Drops Out!

Just four days before the election, Republican nominee Dede Scozzafava abandoned her campaign for the congressional seat in New York's 23rd Congressional district. Why? "It was time to do the right thing, which is to release the Republican County chairs, they've stood by me this entire time, and let them do what's best for the Republican Party," she told a local TV station. A series of polls showed Scozzafava in third place, well behind Democrat Bill Owens and, suddenly, Conservative Doug Hoffman, who had stolen about half of Scozzafava's base.  Where do the rest of her votes go? CW says that most go to Hoffman, but I'm with Jonathan Martin: I think half go to Democrat Bill Owens or they stay home. GOP registration exceeds Democratic registration by nearly 50,000. This is a Republican district that is likely to remain Republican, -- only significantly more conservative than it's been.

More

Oct 30 2009, 8:12PM

State Secrets Invoked -- With A Rare, Almost Apologetic Explanation From The AG

Generally, the Attorney General doesn't comment on routine procedural matters in ongoing cases. But Shubert et. al v. Obama is not routine, and the procedure in question -- the State Secrets Doctrine -- is politically sensitive for the administration. Late today, the Department asserted the privilege to prevent the National Security Agency from having to disclose information about its domestic collection activities after the disclosure of the Terrorist Surveillance Program, or TSP, in 2005. The plaintiffs allege they were caught up in a "dragnet" of NSA surveillance that included unwarranted massive collection of domestic phone calls, e-mails and other data.

More

Oct 30 2009, 1:31PM

What the NY-23 Special Election Is Really About

In the span of a few short weeks, the special election in New York's 23rd congressional District has become the one result that the savviest church members are polishing off our sharpest metaphors for.

But what would a victory by the Democrat, Bill Owens, or the Conservative, Doug Hoffmann, actually mean? And is it possible that the political community will over-interpret the consequences? Most certainly. We're all lit-crits now; on Wednesday morning, the real lesson will be decided by whose explanation triumphs in a contested arena: Republicans versus Conservatives, Governing Conservatives versus Theoretical Conservatives, Palin-Beck Crazies versus Sane Modernists.

Before you get there, though, go here:

More

Oct 30 2009, 10:44AM

$50 Billion For Intelligence

The Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, informed the press today that the National Intelligence Program, the primary account used to fund intelligence activities (and Hamid Karzai's brother's activities?) was $49.5 billion for FY 2009.  Blair's required by law to disclose the number, which tells us... very little, actually, about spending across the intelligence community, except for the fact that we're spending a lot of money on intelligence. In 2008, the NIP budget hovered around $47.5 billion. In 1997, the figure for the comparable program was about $27 billion.

More

Oct 30 2009, 10:39AM

Metaphor Of The Week: Harry Reid's First Down

When Sen. Joe Lieberman told reporters that he wouldn't hesitate to join a Republican filibuster against closing debate on the health care bill, it was widely interpreted as a slap in the face of Democrats, Lieberman's Senate colleagues and the majority leader, Harry Reid. It was so obviously that, right? NBC's Ken Strickland has a different point of view. Lieberman, in fact, gave Harry Reid a victory. He said he wouldn't vote against bringing the bill to the floor -- which is really all that Reid expected of him. What Lieberman intends to do four weeks from now when the political atmospherics are almost certainly different -- that's anyone's guess. Here's Strickland's metaphor:

Point is, Reid needs first downs before he can get to the end zone or even the red zone. And right now, he doesn't even have the votes for that first down. So let's not get too far ahead of ourselves and try to predict what will happen in the red zone -- if Democrats carry the ball that far.

Oct 30 2009, 6:44AM

Lieberman Wants Senate-Confirmed Cyber Coordinator

Good timing for Sen. Joe Lieberman: the night before he's slated to lay out his vision for a comprehensive remake of the nation's cybersecurity laws, his colleagues on the House Ethics Committee were dealing with the fallout of a major cybersecurity breach.

In a speech this morning at the Chamber of Commerce, Lieberman, the chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, will outline legislation that includes the step of making president's cyber coordinator a Senate confirmed position. The White House, which has not named its cyber coordinator, wants the position to be accountable only to the National Security Adviser.

More

Oct 29 2009, 3:36PM

Blast From The Past Newt: Reagan Revolution's Civil Rights Failure

In a way, Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House, predicted the Current Crisis in the Republican Party as early as 1989. In an interview that year with the Ripon Society, a still-on-his-vertical-trajectory Gingrich projected that the conservative movement would split between those who favored a "governing conservatism" and those conservatives who want to keep conservatism theoretical. Gingrich in 1989 sounds a lot like Gingrich in 2009, with some differences -- he supported a "living wage" back then. The interview, which you can find here, began with Ripon's moderator noting that Gingrich's ascension to the post of Minority Whip was built on the work of moderate Republicans.

Responded Gingrich: "There's no question that I would not be House Republican whip if activists in the moderate wing had not supported me. I carried New England by seven to three: I was nominated by Bill Frenzel; Olympia Snowe seconded my nomination; and others like Steve Gunderson and Claudine Schneider played major roles. So I regard my election as a coalition victory for activists of all the ideological views of the Republican Party."

More

Oct 29 2009, 3:08PM

Virginia Governor's Race: More Lessons Learned

Yesterday, I offered my first impressions about why Republican Bob McDonnell is so handily beating Democrat Creigh Deeds in Virginia. Here are some additional lessons that Republicans and Democrats are learning.

1. Culture Warriorism Don't Work.  At least not in this environment. Deeds's internal polling showed that the number one issue, by far, for voters across state but in Northern Virginia in particular, was the economy, jobs and infrastructure improvement. This is no different than in previous elections, but the salience of these issues were all the more acute. Virginia remains the best place to do business (says CNBC) and its unemployment rate is the lowest in the nation. No surprise that Bob McDonnell focused his ads, like a laser beam, on these issues without referring to the incumbent.

More

Oct 29 2009, 3:02PM

The Nuclear Stockpile Flashpoint

Last week, in writing about President Obama's decision to take a more hands-on approach to his Nuclear Posture Review, I implied that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a public speech to throw a dart at the Defense Department and Secretary Robert Gates by attempting to redefine what it means for the U.S. to be confident in the nuclear stockpile it has.

I quoted Clinton as saying that "General [Kevin P.] Chilton, Commander of U.S. Stratcom, has said repeatedly that he doesn't need new nuclear weapons capabilities -- but he must be confident in the capabilities that we have."

A senior defense official called to dispute the view that Clinton's comment amounted to a challenge to the Pentagon.

More

Oct 28 2009, 3:18PM

What Did Congress Know About Wali Karzai?

What did Congress know about Wali Karzai? The C.I.A. isn't obligated to report the identity of every agent or recipient of its laundered funds, but given the importance of W. Karzai to the operation and given how much money he seems to have gotten, good lawyers at the agency probably would have suggested that the notification be made, at least to the "Gang of 8."   Reporters aren't having any luck getting members of the intelligence committees to comment.

And why aren't Republicans jumping on the news, framed by some in this way: that the Obama administration propped up one of the biggest (alleged) opium dealers in Afghanistan -- opium that is funding Taliban forces committed to the death of American soldiers?

I suspect it's because Republicans like the idea of the CIA being aggressive. Or they don't know all the facts...and don't want to inadvertently confirm a story that isn't true.

Incidentally: how hard is it going to be for the CIA to promise anonymity to lower-level Afghan Taliban leaders and potential sources now?

Oct 28 2009, 3:16PM

Blowing Wali Karzai's Cover: A Wall Of Silence

A wall of silence met inquiries about the New York Times' revelation that the Ahmed Wali Shah Karzai, the brother of the President of Afghanistan and a suspected opium lord, has been on the CIA payroll since 2001.

More

Oct 28 2009, 1:34PM

Public Option Options: The Unknown Unknowns

Here's a thumbnail guide to the public option options out there. For a great graphical representation, check out Nate Silver's work. For a tight look at the Senate's options, read Ezra Klein's. 

To figure out what the public option will do, you first need to know

(1) Who pays for it -- the government or individuals through premiums?
(2) Who gets to participate? Everyone? Small businesses? 
(3) How much providers are paid, and who gets to set the rates?
(4) Do states get to opt-in, or opt-out? How large does a public option have to be in order to have any effect? What's the existing market like?
(5) Does it kick in immediately? Is there a trigger?

More

Oct 28 2009, 12:11PM

Pre-Mortem: How Did Deeds Get Into So Much Trouble?

I could just as easily have titled this post "Why Bob McDonnell is winning." Let's start with the candidate. As Virginia uber-blogger Not Larry Sabato points out, to be a governor is to be a manager. Voters intuitively understand this, and so they look to the candidate who seems to be the best manager. Creigh Deeds (D) doesn't come off as a confident, crisp, efficient manager; Bob McDonnell does. The dynamics of an open seat, with a much narrower pool of voters, a re-energized Republican Party -- these conditions were expected, and they were satisfied. Deeds's climb would be uphill. Also: Virginians fell in love with Mark Warner. They fell in like with Tim Kaine. They seem underwhelmed by Creigh Deeds.

Here are six other reasons why Deeds is losing among, for goodness sakes, even women.

More

Oct 28 2009, 10:57AM

On 11/21 in Iowa, Biden v. Palin, One Round...

News that the Iowa Family Policy Center is trying to recruit former AR Gov. Sarah Palin to attend its major annual fundraiser sets up the media-drooling possibility of a Fight Night in Des Moines.  The IFPC has rented the Wells Fargo Center downtown. Across the street,  at Hy-Vee Hall, Vice President Joe Biden will attend the Iowa Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson dinner. 

Oct 28 2009, 9:42AM

Palin's Honest But Unqualified, Americans Say

There's been some perturbation in Sarah Palin's orbit since the end of the presidential campaign. The new NBC News / Wall Street Journal poll finds a statistically significant drop in her favorability numbers since July; only 26% of Americans have a positive response to her versus 42% who regard her with suspicion. CNN's version of the same question lumps together the "mostlies" and pushes respondents to make an assessment. Palin's favorability rating rises to 42%; her unfavorability rating rises to 52%.

More

Oct 27 2009, 10:18PM

Gore Vidal On Obama: "Experience Mattered"

In an interview with author John Meroney, provocateur Gore Vidal has some choice words about politics. In the primaries, he supported Hillary Clinton. Here's what he says about Barack Obama:

"... And I've always been very pro-African-American - or whatever phrase we now use. I was curious to see what would happen when their time came. I was delighted when Obama appeared on the scene. But now it seems as though our original objection to him - that experience mattered - was well-founded."

And here's Vidal on Ted Kennedy's legacy:

It's nothing. But I predicted that at the beginning, when Jack started backing him for his U.S. Senate seat. Historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., who was a loyal Kennedy courtier, agreed. But Jack was funny about it. He never took Arthur seriously. He always called him "the movie critic." (Imitating JFK's accent) "What does 'the movie critic' have to say about this issue?" He liked to tease Arthur.

Read the rest, here.

Oct 27 2009, 6:36PM

Reality Check: Biden At 42% In Context

Joe Biden's less popular than Al Gore? Than Dick Cheney? Say it ain't so. OK, it ain't so. A new Gallup poll out this week suggests that Biden's favorability rating has reached its lowest level since the Democratic National Convention. It's now 42%, a full 13 points lower than President Obama's current rating and ten points below where Biden rated at the inauguration. Gallup measured the ratings of Al Gore and Dick Cheney over the course of 1993 and 2001, respectively, and found that Cheney averaged a 65% approval rating and Gore, a 55% approval rating.

More

Oct 27 2009, 1:59PM

In Supporting Filibuster, Lieberman Plays For Power

How many Democrats instantly flashed back to President Obama's expansive attitude toward Sen. Joseph Lieberman after the 2008 elections, where Lieberman threatened to leave the party after Harry Reid tried to strip him of his Homeland Security Committee chairmanship? Publicly, the White House said that reconciliation was the order of the day. Privately, they sent word that Lieberman would be a reliable vote on the big issues of the day, like, um, health care. As Lieberman pal Chris Dodd put it at the time, Lieberman "is willing to be a member of your family," so why not let him in?

More

Oct 27 2009, 1:34PM

Snowe Explains Her Health Care Journey

Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) wouldn't exactly say whether she'll ultimately oppose a health care bill that includes an opt-out public option today. Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, Snowe promised to "continue to work on issues as this bill comes to the floor." She said that she spoke to President Obama on Friday, and with Obama "basically indicating to me that it was likely you know that the public option would be considered as part of the integrated plan between the HELP and the Finance Committee but wanted to continue to work with me in the future." (BTW: This was before Democratic aides on the Hill leaked word to reporters that the White House was still trying to pressure senators to keep Snowe's "trigger" option viable.)

More

Oct 27 2009, 1:17PM

Prespinning November 3: A Good Night For....

Let's assume that Republicans win the Virginia governor's race, Democrats win New Jersey's gubernatorial race, Democrat Bill Owens wins the special election in New York's 23rd Congressional district, voters approve gay marriage in Maine and turn back domestic partnership benefits in Washington State.

More

Oct 27 2009, 12:23PM

GOPWars: Newt Gingrich, RINO in Chief?

He was once a revolutionary himself, challenging the party structure, blasting away orthodoxies and storming to power. But former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich finds himself in the role of the old guy in the basement. Last night, appearing on Fox News's "Greta!" Van Susteren, Gingrich found himself urging conservatives not to forsake the adequate at the expense of a party that can win national elections.

This sounds like the debate that out-parties always have. Activists stress ideological purity and party apparatchiks stress coalition-building. Activists question the fidelity of the national party committees to principles (e.g., to quote Christ, "What good will it be for a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul?" (Matt. 16:26 NIV)); the national party committees question the activists' relationship to reality.

More

Oct 27 2009, 11:58AM

No Good Deeds Go Unpunished

Even more evidence that something went very very wrong with the Democratic gubernatorial candidate in Virginia:

The Washington Post notes that Bob McDonnell "has overtaken Deeds as the one more trusted to handle issues of special concern to women (7 points)."

Maybe Deeds should run a few more "thesis" ads...

Oct 26 2009, 6:09PM

VA GOV Race's About Deeds And Democrats, Not Obama

There's more evidence tonight that the Virginia governor's race shouldn't be interpreted as a referendum on President Obama. That doesn't mean that Democrats are out of the woods. As expected, Republican Bob McDonnell has a comfortable, eleven point lead over Democrat Creigh Deeds in the latest Washington Post poll.  President Obama's approval rating is 54%, which suggests that a lot of folks who went to the polls for him in 2008 won't be bothered to vote for Deeds and / or that a number of Obama voters have decided to cast their ballot for McDonnell. The former explanation finds empirical support.

More

Oct 26 2009, 4:00PM

Reid's Roll Of The Dice

With Sen. Harry Reid's decision to ask the Congressional Budget Office to score a public option that states can choose to use, he's betting against the prospect of any Democratic senator filibustering the end product of health care reforms. Reid decided not to submit a public option with a trigger mechanism -- the approach favored by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), calculating instead that he would be able to enforce party solidarity on what will certainly be an epochal vote.  In order to induce at least one of those Democrats, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), Reid said that the final Senate bill would include non-profit co-op experiments, but he did not provide details. Liberals will interpret Reid's decision as evidence that their pressure worked. Indeed, Reid seemed to acknowledge that the power of moderates was not nearly as acute as it had been -- or that he thought it had been. He noted that, almost any way the data is sliced, Americans support a "public option" and understand what it would do.

More

Oct 26 2009, 3:24PM

Obesity Policy Watch: Menu Labeling Results Are In

As of March of 2008, fast food establishments in New York City have been required to post fat and calorie counts on menu boards, with the idea being that consumers would at the very least pause and think for a moment before purchasing the same donut every morning. The law was vigorously resisted by food and restaurant companies; obesity researchers didn't know whether the law would lead to a decrease in calorie consumption or to a paradoxical effect known as "portion distortion," where diners and snackers increase the total amount of food they eat to compensate or reward themselves for choosing lower-calorie items. This isn't a parochial NYC issue anymore: both House and Senate health care drafts require most restuarant menus to mandatory calorie counts.  The first round of data is now in, and it is, not surprisingly, equivocal. 

More

Oct 26 2009, 2:56PM

Ballot Initiatives To Watch On 11/3

Citizen sovereignty will be alive and well next Tuesday, as voters decide more than two dozen ballot initiatives across six states. Here's a look at the five most interesting -- and potentially most consequential -- initiatives and referenda.

Maine -- Question 1 -- A People's Veto of Gay Marriage -- This is a big one. Last year, Maine's legislature passed a law permitting same-sex marriage. "Let the states decide" doesn't really work as a defense against gay marriage when states start legalizing it, of course, and so the new rallying cry is: "let the people decide."  Mainers have the chance to veto the legislature's decision; if they fail to veto it, they ratify it, becoming the first state in the nation to affirm gay marriage by direct democracy. Major interest groups on both sides have spent millions. Opponents of same-sex marriage are determined to establish a a lagoon around marriage. They're also running ads linking gay people to sex, sex education, and anti-religious orthodoxy. In general, voters tend to be less willing to repeal laws already on the books than they do to create new rights, so No on 1 -- the "no" side would preserve the law -- have a psychological edge. They've also got an edge in recent polling. Note: a referendum in Washington State would allow a people's veto of a bill that expanded domestic partner benefits.

More

Oct 25 2009, 2:16PM

The Sunday Shows In Five Bullet Points Or Less

1. As Florida goes, so goes...Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) played the cooling saucer a bit this morning, expressing pessimism about a robust public option but did not rule out voting for one in the final analysis. Would Nelson support a filibuster cut-off knowing that the underlying bill would include a public option?  Said he: "I think, reckless to say I'll support the procedure without knowing what the underlying bill consists of. And it's not put together yet. It's a draft -- it will be a draft bill some time next week, submitted the Congressional Budget Office for the review of the cost."  

2. Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai thanked Sen. John Kerry for helping him make the decision to accept a run-off election, said that he would not be open to a unity government (and Dr. Abdullah Abdullah said he wouldn't join one) but would welcome advice from his challengers, and did not agree that more American troops would necessarily be viewed as occupiers.

That is a legitimate concern, and that has to be taken very much into consideration, and that's why I emphasized two very important things. The arrival of forces must enhance the sense of protection of the Afghan people, and must give protection to the Afghan people. It must not be a capture and kill pursuit of the Taliban, it must be one that provides protection to the country, and must also lead to the enhancement of the abilities of the Afghan military and security forces. Therefore they have to come as liberators as they did in 2002 and not otherwise
3. Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) predicted that President Obama would have "trouble with the American people" if he sends 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan. Sen. Chuck Schumer said that "leader Reid is ... leaning towards ... putting a state opt-out public option in the bill."

4. Sen. Mitch McConnell  (R-KY) lauded the Obama administration's preparation for the H1N1 emergency and said that one reason why more people are going to the hospital is that public awareness has been sufficiently raised.

5. Prediction: Al Hunt believes that Sen. Olympia Snowe's vote will be critical to final passage and that she'll provide cover for moderate Democrats and even some Senate Republicans. And Newt Gingrich says he'll decide about 2012...in February of 2011.

Oct 23 2009, 6:08PM

White House Denies Report That It Wants To Weaken Public Plan

The White House is denying reports that officials are pressuring Sen. Harry Reid to scale back the scope of the "public option" that'll be attached to the Senate health insurance bill.  Talking Points Memo reported, based on unnamed sources close to the negotiations, that the White House is "skeptical" of a public option that includes a state opt-out choice, preferring -- and advocating for -- a public option that would kick in only if the private exchange failed to lower costs.

"The report is false. The White House continues to work with the Senate on the merging of the two  bills," said Dan Pfeiffer, a top White House aide whose portfolio includes health care. "We are making good progress toward enacting comprehensive health reform."

TPM notes that Sen, Jay Rockefeller sent out a seemingly unprompted press release rejecting the "trigger" option.  It claims that the White House's pressure on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is based on President Obama's desire to accommodate the wishes of Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), who supports a trigger-only public plan and who voted "yes" on the Senate Finance Committee's health care draft.

Oct 23 2009, 5:00PM

On Nukes, Obama Plans Hands-On Approach

President Obama plans to take a more active role in preparing America's nuclear weapons strategy, helping to ensure that the final document, due out next year, reflects his priorities, rather than just the institutional views of his government, administration officials said.

Mr. Obama was said to be unhappy when the Defense Department presented to him its decision to remove a long-range missile battery from Poland and a sophisticated radar system from the Czech Republic. Obama had little time to study the issue before the vagaries of the Pentagon's budget procedures forced his hand. Responding to concerns that the Nuclear Posture Review  (NPR) was being completed without enough input from his staff and from the State Department, Obama has decided to provide guidance directly, and plans to participate in several high-level meetings.

More

Oct 23 2009, 3:12PM

The World Series Might Arrest Daggett's Surge

Independent gubernatorial candidate Chris Daggett is up to 19% and 20% in polls taken by SurveyUSA and Rutgers/Eagleton. If they're right, Mark Blumenthal tells us, the parrallels to former Minnesota Gov./independent Jesse Ventura's trial heat is intriguing.   But Blumenthal cautions that there are at least six reasons why Daggett's climb may be more steep than Ventura's was.

One is this:

• Baseball. If the New Jersey news hole in those markets were not already small enough, the prospect of a Philadelphia-New York World Series during the last six days of the race diminishes it even further (the Phillies have clinched, the Yankees are one game away).

Oct 23 2009, 1:28PM

Third Party Watch: GOP's Approval Rating Lowest In Decade

Eager to please, ready to fight, but why do they go to extremes? According to a new poll by CNN, voters' feelings for the Republican Party have chilled to their lowest levels in a decade, with 36% expressing a favorable view and 54% expressing an unfavorable view. In contrast, Democrats enjoy a fairly healthy approval rating -- 53% -- though their Congress, in general, gets much lower marks. 38% say Democrats are doing a good job in Congress. 33% say Republicans are doing a good job in Congress. What this suggests: Americans think of Democrats and think of Barack Obama and others, not just Harry Reid. Americans think of Republicans and think of...Congressional Republicans.

Oct 23 2009, 1:20PM

J-Street's Ben-Ami Wants To Anger The Left, Too

The chief of J-Street, the liberal Middle East peace advocacy group, has drawn plenty of ire from conservatives. Maybe too much...On the eve of its convention, the head of J-Street, Jeremy Ben-Ami, tells Jeffrey Goldberg in a fiesty interview that J-Street isn't necessarily going to please liberals all of the time either.

One -- he favors the Right of Return, always and forever. He believes that American military aid to Israel should never stop.

"I hope that we have a very strong left flank that attacks us, that Jewish Voice for Peace and other groups that are consistently upset with us for backing Howard Berman's sanctions plan and for refusing to embrace the Goldstone report and for standing up for the right of Israel to defend itself or for its military aid -- I hope we get attacked from the left because I would characterize J Street as the mainstream of the American Jewish community."

BTW: Despite a New York Times assertion to the contrary, the Jews on his staff aren't intermarried (not that that's a bad thing!).

And boy, Ben-Ami doesn't seem to like Michael Goldfarb.